Do we need a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research?

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 340, Issue 7757, 2010, Pages 1172-1174

  Hansson, Mats G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS;

EID: 77953945407     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Iversen A, Liddell K, Fear N, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Consent, confidentiality and the Data Protection Act. BMJ 2006;332:165-9. (Pubitemid 43139411)
2. Ward HJ, Cousens SN, Smith-Bathgate B, Leitch M, Everington D, Will RG, et al. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. BMJ 2004;329:277-9.
3. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, et al. Impracticability of informed consent in the registry of the Canadian stroke network. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1414-21.
4. Collins R, Doll R, Peto R. Ethics of clinical trials. In: Williams CJ, ed. Introducing new treatments for cancer: practical, ethical, and legal problems. Wiley, 1992:54.
5. Coleman MP, Evans BG, Barrett G. Confidentiality and the public interest in medical research - will we ever get it right? Clin Med 2003;3:219-28. (Pubitemid 36791191)
6. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies. CIOMS, 2009.
7. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlsson J, Helgesson G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 2006;7:266-9. (Pubitemid 43286456)
8. Elger B. Consent and use of samples. In: Elger B, Biller-Andorno N, Mauron A, Capron AM, eds. Ethical issues in governing biobanks. Global perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, 2008:57.
9. Hofmann B. Broadening consent - and diluting ethics? J Med Ethics 2009;35:125-9.
10. Árnason V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004;18:27-49. (Pubitemid 38453590)
11. Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. Kings Law J 2007;18:209-26.
12. Hultman CM, Lindgren A-C, Hansson MG, Carlstedt-Duke J, Ritzen M, Persson I, et al. Ethical issues in cancer register follow-up of hormone treatment in adolescence. Pub Health Ethics 2009;2:30-6.
13. Helgesson G, Dillner J, Carlson J, Bartram CR, Hansson MG. Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples. Nat Biotech 2007;25:973-6. (Pubitemid 47517629)
14. Hansson MG. Balancing the quality of consent. J Med Ethics 1998;24:182-7.
15. Tushnet M. Legal conventionalism in the US constitutional law of privacy. In: Paul EF, Miller FD Jr, Paul J, eds. The right to privacy. Cambridge University Press, 2000:141-64.