Phantom Behavioral Assimilation Effects: Systematic Biases in Social Comparison Choice Studies

Journal of Personality

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 671-710

  Marsh, Herbert W ^a   Seaton, Marjorie ^b   Kuyper, Hans ^c   Dumas, Florence ^e   Huguet, Pascal ^d   Régner, Isabelle ^f   Buunk, Abraham P ^c   Monteil, Jean Marc ^g   Gibbons, Frederick X ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MOULIN LYON 3   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^h DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77953930913     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00630.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Blanton H, Buunk B P, Gibbons F X, Kuyper H. When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76:420-430.
2. Brickman P, Bulman R J. Pleasure and pain in social comparison. Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives 1977, 149-186. Suls J M, Miller R L. (Eds.), Washington, DC, Hemisphere
3. Brown J. Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars 2007, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley
4. Buckingham J T, Alicke M D. The influence of individual versus aggregate social comparisons and the presence of others on self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:1117-1130.
5. Collins R. For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:51-69.
6. Collins R. Among the better ones. Upward assimilation in social comparison. Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research 2000, 159-171. Suls JWheeler L. (Eds.), New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum
7. Diener E, Fujita F. Social comparisons and subjective well-being. Health, coping and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory 1997, 329-358. Buunk B P, Gibbons F X. (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
8. Dijkstra P, Kuyper H, van der Werf G, Buunk A P, van der Zee Y G. Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research 2008, 78:828-879.
9. Dumas F, Huguet P, Monteil J-M, Ayme E. Context effects in the Stroop task: Knowledge of one's relative standing makes a difference. Current Psychology Letters: Cognition, Brain, and Behavior 2005, 16:1-12.
10. Dumas F, Huguet P, Monteil J-M, Rastoul C, Nezlek J B. Social comparison in the classroom: Is there a tendency to compare upward in elementary school? Current Research in Social Psychology 2005, 10:166-187.
11. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 1954, 7:117-140.
12. Hakmiller K L. Threat as a determinant of downward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social 1966, 2:32-39.
13. Harker R, Tymms P. The effects of student composition on school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2004, 15:177-199.
14. Huguet P, Dumas F, Marsh H W, Régner I, Wheeler L, Suls J. Clarifying the role of social comparison in the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:156-170.
15. Huguet P, Dumas F, Monteil J-M, Genestoux N. Social comparison choices in the classroom: Further evidence for students' upward comparison tendency and its beneficial impact on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 31:557-578.
16. Huguet P, Galvaing M-P, Monteil J M, Dumas F. Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1011-1025.
17. Johnson C S, Stapel D A. No pain, no gain: The conditions under which upward comparisons lead to better performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:1051-1067.
18. Jöreskog K G. Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal investigations. Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development 1979, 303-351. Nesselroade J RBaltes B. (Eds.), New York, Academic Press
19. Major B, Testa M, Bylsma W H. Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research 1991, 237-260. Suls J, Wills T A, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
20. Marsh H W. The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 1987, 79:280-295.
21. Marsh H W. Failure of high ability schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal 1991, 28:445-480.
22. Marsh H W. Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self concept in educational psychology 2007, London, British Psychological Society
23. Marsh H W, Craven R. The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The Big Fish Little Pond effect. Adolescence and education 2002, 83-123. Pajares F, Urdan T. (Eds.), Greenwich, CT, Information Age
24. Marsh H W, Hau K-T. Assessing goodness of fit: Is parsimony always desirable? Journal of Experimental Education 1996, 64:364-390.
25. Marsh H W, Hau K. Big-fish-little-pond-effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist 2003, 58:364-376.
26. Marsh H W, Hau K-T. Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2007, 32:151-171.
27. Marsh H W, Kong C K, Hau K T. Longitudinal multilevel models of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:337-349.
28. Marsh H W, Seaton M, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Hau K T, O'Mara A J. The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20:319-350.
29. Marsh H W, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Baumert J, Köller O. The big fish little pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal 2007, 44:631-669.
30. Marsh H W, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Köller O. Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100:510-524.
31. Muthén L, Muthén B. Mplus user's guide 2008, 5th ed., Los Angeles, CA, Author
32. Nosanchuk T A, Erickson B H. How high is up? Calibrating social comparison in the real world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 48:624-634.
33. Radloff R. Social comparison and ability evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966, 2:6-26.
34. Schachter S. The psychology of affiliation 1959, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
35. Seaton M. 2007, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney
36. Seaton M, Marsh H W, Dumas F, Huguet P, Monteil J-M, Régner I. In search of the big fish: Investigating the coexistence of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect with the positive effects of upward comparison. British Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 47:73-103.
37. Suls J. Social comparison theory and research: An overview from 1954. Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives 1977, 1-19. Suls JMiller R L. (Eds.), Washington, DC, Wiley
38. Suls J, Wheeler L. A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research 2000, 3-19. Suls J, Wheeler L. (Eds.), New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum
39. Wheeler L. Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966, 2:27-31.
40. Wills T A. Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 90:245-271.
41. Wood J V. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106:231-248.