How well quantified is the limit of quantification?

Epidemiology

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2010, Pages

  Guo, Ying ^a   Harel, Ofer ^b   Little, Roderick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TOCOPHEROL; BETA CRYPTOXANTHIN; CAROTENE; GAMMA TOCOPHEROL; LYCOPENE; RETINOL; XANTHOPHYLL; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; CRYPTOXANTHIN; VITAMIN;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CALIBRATION; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; BLOOD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LIMIT OF DETECTION;

ANTICARCINOGENIC AGENTS; BAYES THEOREM; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; VITAMINS; XANTHOPHYLLS; CRYPTOXANTHINS;

EID: 77953916488     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d60e56     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Currie LA. Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination\application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem. 1968;40:586-592.
2. Hopke PK, Liu C, Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for multivariate data with missing and below-threshold measurements: Time-series concentrations of pollutants in the Arctic. Biometrics. 2001;57:22-33.
3. Richardson DB, Ciampi A. Effect of exposure measurement error when an exposure variable is constrained by a lower limit. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:355-363.
4. Schisterman EF, Vexler A, Whitcomb BW, Liu A. The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;163:374-383.
5. Schwenke JR, Milliken G. On the calibration problem extended to nonlinear models. Biometrics. 1991;47:563-574.
6. Giltinan D, Davidian M. Assays for recombinanat proteins: A problem in non-linear calibration. Stat Med. 1994;13:1165-1179.
7. Belanger B, Davidian M, Giltinan D. The effect of variance function estimation on non-linear calibration inference in immunoassay. Biometrics. 1996;52:158-175.
8. Higgins KM, Davidian M, Chew G, Burge H. The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay. Biometrics. 1998;54:19-32.
9. Dunsmore IR. A Bayesian approach to calibration. J R Stat Soc B Stat Meth. 1968;44:287-321.
10. Racine-Poon A. A Bayesian approach to nonlinear calibration problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:650-656.
11. Gelman A, Chew GL, Shnaidman M. Bayesian analysis of serial dilution assays. Biometrics. 2004;60:407-417.
12. Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll R. Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
13. Besag J. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J R Stat Soc B Stat Meth. 1986;48:259-279.
14. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D. Transformation and Weighting in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1988.
15. Fox J. Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods. New York: Sage; 1997.
16. Fuller WA. Measurement Error Models. New York: Wiley; 1987.
17. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu C. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 2006.