The Finnish public discussion of giftedness and gifted children

High Ability Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 63-76

  Laine, Sonja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Conceptions; Content analysis; Gifted children; Giftedness; Public discussion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953898898     PISSN: 13598139     EISSN: 1469834X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2010.488092     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahonen, S. (2008). 1990-luvun koulutuspoliittinen käänne. [The turn of educational policy in the 1990s] In R. Meriläinen (Ed.), Suomalaisen koulutuspolitiikan murros 1990-luvulla [The break-up of Finnish educational policy in the 1990s] (pp. 11-21). Saarijärvi: Saarijärven offset.
2. Borland, J.H., & Wright, L. (2000). Identifying and educating poor and under-represented gifted students. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sernberg, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 587-94). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
3. Callahan, C. (2005). Identifying gifted students from underrepresented population. Theory Into Practice, 44(2), 98-104.
4. Colangelo, N., & Davis, G.A. (2003). Introduction and overview. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 3-9). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-15.
6. Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted: How conceptions of giftedness can change lives. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 80-97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119-47.
8. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
9. Gordon, E.W., & Bridglall, B.L. (2005). Nurturing talent in gifted students of color. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 120-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hany, E.A. (1993). Methodological problems and issues concerning identification. In K. Heller, F.J. Mönks, & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 209-32). Exeter: BPCC Wheatons.
11. Helsingin Sanomat (2008). Retrieved August 23, 2008, from http://www.hs.fi/english/about/
12. Johnson, B., & Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Karnes, F.A., & Lewis, J.D. (1997). Public relations: A necessary tool for advocacy in gifted education. ERIC EC Digest #E542 http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/eric/e542.html
14. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Lewis, J.D., & Karnes, F.A. (1997). A portrayal of the gifted in magazines. [Electronic version] Retrieved June 3, 2009, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED405710&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED405710
16. Meckstroth, B., & Kearney, K. (2007). Indecent exposure: Does the media exploit highly gifted children? [Electronic version] Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/indecent_exposure.htm
17. Moon, S.M., & Rosselli, H.C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 499-521). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
18. Norman, A.D., Ramsay, S.G., Roberts, J.L., & Martray, C.R. (2000). Effect of social setting, self-concept, and relative age on the social status of moderately and highly gifted students. Roeper Review, 23(1), 34-9.
19. Opettaja (2008). Retrieved August 23, 2008, from http://www.opettaja.fi/portal/page?_pageid=95,82039&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
20. Radford, J. (1998). Prodigies in the press. High Ability Studies, 9(2), 153-65.
21. Reis, S.M., & McCoach, D.B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10(2), 113-25.
22. Reis, S.M., & Renzulli, J.S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities [Electronic version]. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119-30.
23. Renzulli, J.S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to new century. Exeptionality, 10(2), 67-75.
24. Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1991). Building advocacy through program design, student productivity and public relations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(4), 182-7.
25. Rosenstein, P., & Dettmer, P. (1991). Advocacy for gifted programs: An interview with NAGC executive director Peter D. Rosenstein. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(4), 179-81.
26. Shrum, L.J. (2002). Media consumptions and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In: J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advanced theory and research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
27. Sternberg, R., & Zhang, L. (1995). What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88-94.
28. Taylor, C.A., & Kokot, S.J. (2000). The status of gifted child education in Africa. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 799-815). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
29. Webb, J.T., Gore, J.L., Amend, E.R., & DeVries, A.R. (2007). A parent's guide to gifted children. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential press.
30. Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
32. Yewchuk, C., & Lupart, J. (2000). Inclusive education for gifted students with disabilities. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 659-70). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.