Mixed reality classroom - Learning from entertainment

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 274, Issue , 2007, Pages 65-72

  Liu, Wei ^a   Cheok, Adrian David ^a   Mei Ling, Charissa Lim ^b   Theng, Yin Leng ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Edutainment; Mixed reality; Technology acceptance model; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM TEACHING; DELIVERY MODES; DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; EDUTAINMENT; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; MIXED REALITY; MIXED REALITY TECHNOLOGIES; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PLANT SYSTEMS; PRIMARY SCHOOLS; SELF-LEARNING; SINGAPORE; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TANGIBLE INTERACTION; USER STUDY;

EDUCATION COMPUTING; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; SOLAR SYSTEM; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 77953815368     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1306813.1306830     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bakas, C., and Mikropoulos, T. A. Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students' ideas. International Journal of Science Education 25, 8 (2003), 949-967.
2. Bricken, M., and Byrne, C. M. Summer students in virtual reality: A pilot study on educational applications of virtual reality technology. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-92-1/.
3. Bulman, J., Crabtree, B., Gower, A., Oldroyd, A., Lawson, M., and Sutton, J. Mixed reality applications in urban environments. BT Technology Journal 22, 3 (2004), 84-94.
4. Campbell, B., Collins, P., Hadaway, H., Hedley, N., and Stoermer, M. Web3D in ocean science learning environments: Virtual big beef creek. In Proc. 3D Web technology 2002.
5. Chung, D. Something for nothing: Understanding purchasing behaviors in social virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8, 6 (2005), 538-554.
6. Dede, C. Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause Quarterly 28, 1 (2005). http://www.educause.edu/pub/eq/eqm05/eqm0511.asp?bhcp=1.
7. Dunston, P. S., and Wang, X. Mixed reality basedvisualization interfaces for architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131, 12 (2005), 1301-1309.
8. nd international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia(2004). 230-236.
9. Game to Teach: http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/GamesToTeach.shtml
10. Hughes, C.E., Stapleton, C.B., Hughes, D.E., and Smith, E.M. Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 6 (2005), 24-30.
11. Jackson, R. L., and Fagan, E. Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality. Collaborative Virtual Environments 2000.
12. Kaufmann, H. Collaborative augmented reality in education. In position paper for keynote speech at Inagina 2003 conference.
13. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., and Larsen, K. R. T. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12, (2003), 752-780.
14. Leow, M. C. L. Exploring effectiveness of augmented reality for learning geometry in primary schools: A case study. Unpublished masters thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. (2005).
15. Liarokapis F. et.al, Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 3(1)(2004): 11-14.
16. Mikropoulos, T. A., Chalkidis, A., Katsikis, A., and Emvalotis, A. (1998). Students' attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Education and Information Technologies 3, 137-148.
17. Mikropoulos, T. A., and Strouboulis, V. Factors that influence presence in virtual learning environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 5 (2004), 582-591.
18. Milgram, P., and Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality virtual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E77-D 9, 1994.
19. Mills, S., and Araújo, M. M. Learning through virtual reality: a preliminary investigation. Interacting with Computers 11, 4 (1999), 453-462.
20. Nguyen, T.H.D., Qui, T.C.T., Xu, K., Cheok, A.D., Teo, S.L., Zhou, Z.Y., Mallawaarachchi, A., Lee, S.P., Liu, W., Teo, H.S., Thang, L.N., Li, Y., and Kato, H. Real-time 3D human capture system for mixed-reality art and entertainment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6 (2005), 706-721.
21. Pasqualotti, A. and Freitas, C. M. MAT3D: a virtual reality modeling language environment for the teaching and learning of mathematics. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5, 5 (2002), 409-422.
22. Roussou, M. Learning by doing and learning through play: An exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. ACM Computers in Entertainment 2, 1 (2004), 10-32.
23. Shin, Y. S. (2003). Virtual experiment environments design for science education. In Proc. Int'l Conference on Cyberworlds 2003, IEEE Computer Society, 388-395.
24. Slator, B. M., Clark, J. T., Daniels, L. M., Hill, C., McClean, P., Saini-Eidukat, B., Schwert, D. P., and White, A. R. Use of virtual worlds to teach the sciences. In Series on Innovative Intelligence Vol. 1: Virtual Environments for Teaching and Learning, World Scientific Publishing (2002), 1-35.
25. Stanton, D. et al. Classroom collaboration in the Design of Tangible Interfaces for Storytelling, In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 482-489.
26. Stuart, R. The Design of Virtual Environments. Barricade Books Inc., Ft. Lee, New Jersey, 2001.
27. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46, 2 (2000), 186-204.
28. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 24, 1 (2000), 115-139.
29. Windschitl, M., and Winn, B. A Virtual Environment Designed to Help Students. Understand Science. In International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2000. http://www.umich.edu/~icls/proceedings/pdf/Windschitl1.pdf
30. Winn, W. The Impact of Three-Dimensional Immersive Virtual Environments on Modern Pedagogy. HITL Technical Report R-97-15. Discussion paper for NSF Workshop. University of Washington, Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-97-15/
31. Winn, W., Windschitl, M., Fruland, R., and Lee, Y. When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding? In Proc. International Conference of the Learning Societies 2002. http://depts. washington.edu/edtech/icls.pdf
32. Yeo, K. K. J., Goh, S. K. E, and Koh, E. Z. F. Exploring plan and elevation geometry with ProDesktop. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia 28, 1 (2005), 125-136.