Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 582-591

  Mikropoulos, Tassos A ^a   Strouboulis, Vassilis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER TERMINAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT; EMOTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CHILD; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REALITY TESTING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 8344229872     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.582     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Zhai, P. (1998). Get real: a philosophical adventure in virtual reality. Lanham: Roeman & Littlefield.
3. Lévy, P. (1999). Qu'est - ce que le virtuel? Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
4. Riva, G., & Mantovani, G. (2000). The need for a socio-cultural perspective in the implementation of virtual environments. Virtual Reality 5:32-38.
5. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence 1:262-271.
6. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of telepresence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Available: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
7. Schuemie, M.J., Straaten, P.V., Krijn, M., et al. (2001). Research on presence in VR: a survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:183-201.
8. Steuer, J.S. (1992). Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42:73-93.
9. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Available: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html.
10. Witmer, B.C., & Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7:225-240.
11. Kalawsky, R. (2000). The validity of presence as a reliable human performance metric in immersive environments. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft. Available: www.presence-research.org.
12. Lombard, M. (2000). Resources for the study of presence: presence explication [On-line]. Available: http://nimbus.temple.edu/~mlombard/Presence/ explicat.htm.
13. Krueger, M. (1991). Artificial reality II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
14. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2000). Measuring presence: a literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft. Available: www.presence-research.org.
15. Schloerb D.W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence 4:64-80.
16. Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8:560-566.
17. Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1994). Body-centred interaction in immersive virtual environments. In: Thalmann, N.M., Thalmann, D. (eds.), Artificial life and virtual reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 125-148.
18. Slater, M., Steed, A., McCarthy, J., et al. (1998). The influence of body movement on presence in virtual environments. Human Factors 40:469-477.
19. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 3:130-144.
20. Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., et al. (2000). Small group behaviour in virtual and real environments: a comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9:37-51.
21. Schubert, T.W., Friedman, E, & Regenbrecht, H.T. (1999). Embodied presence in virtual environments, visual representations and interpretations. London: Springer-Verlag.
22. Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresense may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Available: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2/kim.html.
23. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., et al. (2000). Development of a new cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft. Available: www.presence-research.org.
24. Meehan, M. (2000). An objective surrogate for presence: physiological response. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft. Available: www.presence-research.org.
25. Mikropoulos, T. (2000). Brain activity on navigation in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 24:1-12.
26. Dede, C. (1995). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: immersion in distributed virtual worlds. Educational Technology 35:46-52.
27. Winn, W.D., Huffman, H., & Osberg, K. (1999). Semiotics, cognitive theory, and the design of objects, actions and interactions in virtual environments. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems 14:29-49.
28. Winn, W.D., & Windschitl, M. (2000). Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes in Education 1:373-389.
29. Mikropoulos, T.A., Chalkidis, A., Katsikis, A., et al. (1998). Students' attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Education and Information Technologies 3:137-148.
30. Kameas, A., Mikropoulos, T.A., Katsikis, A., et al. (2000). EIKON: teaching a high school technology course with the aid of virtual reality. Education and Information Technologies 5:305-315.
31. st century: research, design, and implementing advanced technology learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Jonassen, D.H., & Land, S.M. (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. London: LEA.
33. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1995). Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on CHI 2:201-219.
34. Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., et al. (2000). Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9:497-503.
35. Barfield, W., Baird, K.M., & Bjorneseth, O.J. (1998). Presence in virtual environments as a function of type of input device and display update rate. Displays 19:91-98.
36. Peterson, B., Wells, M., Furness III, T.A., et al. (1998). The effects of the interface on navigation in virtual environments. In: Stürzlinger, W., Müller, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on virtual environments 2002. Switzerland: Eurographics Association, pp. 1496-1505.
37. Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M.C., et al. (1999). Walking > Walking-in-Place > Flying, in Virtual Environments [On-line]. Available: www.cs.unc.edu/~bastos/siggraph99.pdf.
38. Hoepfuer, W., & Schwanduer, E.L. (1986). Haus und Stadt im klassischen Griechenland. Germany: Deutscher Kunstverlag.
39. Cuddihy, E., Walters, D. (2000). Embodied interaction in social virtual environments. In: Churchill, E., Reddy, M., (eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on collaborative virtual environments. San Francisco, ACM Press, pp. 181-188.