The economic valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities: Methods and applications

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 34, Issue , 2009, Pages 325-347

  Mendelsohn, Robert ^a   Olmstead, Sheila ^a  

^a Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit valuation; Environmental goods; Environmental services; Measurement

Indexed keywords

BENEFIT VALUATION; CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ECONOMIC VALUES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; PHYSICAL SCIENCE; VALUATION METHODS;

AIR QUALITY; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEMS; FERRY BOATS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 77953769053     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-011509-135201     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Krutilla J. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:777-786
2. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260
3. Toman M. 1998. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 25:57-60
4. Freeman AM III. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods.Washington, DC: Resour. Future. 2nd ed.
5. Mäler K-G, Vincent JR. 2005. The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol.2: Valuing Environmental Changes. Amsterdam: North-Holland
6. Bockstael NE, Freeman AM III, Kopp RJ, Portney PR, Smith VK. 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:1384-1389
7. Greenstone M, Gayer T. 2009. Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 57:21-44
8. Smith VK. 2007. Reflections on the literature. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 1:300-318
9. Peters C, Gentry A, Mendelsohn R. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rain forest. Nature 339:655-656
10. Yohe GW, Schlesinger ME. 1998. Sea-level change: the expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States. Clim. Change 38:447-472
11. Mansur E, Mendelsohn R, Morrison W. 2008. A discrete continuous model of energy: measuring climate change impacts on energy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 55:175-193
12. Hurd B, Callaway JM, Smith JB, Kirshen P. 1999. Economic effects of climate change on US water resources. See Ref. 150, pp. 133-177
13. Clawson M. 1959. Methods of measuring the demand and value of outdoor recreation. Resour. Future, Reprint 10.Washington, DC
14. Knetsch JL. 1963. Outdoor recreation demands and benefits. Land Econ. 39:387-396
15. Burt O, Brewer D. 1971. Estimation of net social benefits from outdoor recreation. Econometrica 39:813-827
16. Kling C. 1988. Comparing welfare estimates of environmental quality changes from recreation demand models. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 15:331-340
17. Morey E. 1981. The demand for site-specific recreation activities: a characteristics approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 8:345-371
18. Hanemann WM. 1978. A methodological and empirical study of the recreation benefits from water quality improvement. PhD thesis. Harvard Univ., Economics Dep., Cambridge, MA
19. Phaneuf DJ, Smith VK. 2005. Recreational demand models. See Ref. 5, pp. 672-761
20. Randall A. 1994. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Econ. 70:88-96
21. Bockstael NE, Strand IE, Hanemann WM. 1987. Time and the recreational demand model. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 69:293-302
22. Cesario F. 1976. Value of time and recreation benefit studies. Land Econ. 52:32-41
23. Smith VK, Desvousges WH, McGivney MP. 1983. The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models. Land Econ. 59:259-278
24. Ridker R, Henning J. 1967. The determination of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Rev. Econ. Stat. 48:246-257
25. Harrison D Jr, Rubinfeld DL. 1978. Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 5:81-102
26. Palmquist R, Smith VK. 2002. The use of hedonic property value techniques for policy and litigation. See Ref. 151, pp. 115-164
27. Palmquist R. 2005. Property value models. See Ref. 5, pp. 763-819
28. Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82:34-55
29. Brown JN, Rosen HS. 1982. On the estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50:765-768
30. Mendelsohn R. 1985. Identifying structural equations with single market data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67:525-529
31. Palmquist R. 1984. Estimating the demand for characteristics of housing. Rev. Econ. Stat. 66:394-404
32. Ekeland I, Heckman JJ, Nesheim L. 2004. Identification and estimation of hedonic models. J. Polit. Econ. 112(Part 2):S60-109
33. Chay K, Greenstone M. 2005. Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. J. Polit. Econ. 113:376-424
34. Bayer P, Keohane N, Timmins C. 2009. Migration and hedonic valuation: the case of air quality. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 58:1-14
35. Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W, Shaw D. 1994. Measuring the impact of global warming on agriculture. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:753-771
36. Deschenes O, Greenstone M. 2007. The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:354-385
37. Thaler R, Rosen S. 1976. The value of saving a life: evidence from the market. In Household Production and Consumption, ed. N Terleckyj, pp. 265-298 Cambridge, MA: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.
38. ViscusiWK.1979. Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance. Cambridge, MA:Harvard Univ. Press
39. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE. 2003. The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertain. 27:5-76
40. Viscusi WK,Moore MJ. 1987.Workers' compensation: wage effects, benefit inadequacies, and the value of health losses. Rev. Econ. Stat. 69:249-261
41. DeLeire T, Timmins C. 2008. Roy model sorting and nonrandom selection in the valuation of a statistical life. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.Work. Pap. 14364, Cambridge, MA
42. Moore M, Viscusi WK. 1988. The quantity-adjusted value of life. Econ. Inq. 26:369-388
43. Aldy JE, Viscusi WK. 2008. Adjusting the value of a statistical life for age and cohort effects. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90:573-581
44. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE. 2007. Labor market estimates of the senior discount for the value of a statistical life. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53:377-392
45. Liu J-T, Hammitt JK, Liu J-L. 1997. Estimated hedonic wage function and value of life in a developing country. Econ. Lett. 57:353-358
46. Alberini A, Cropper ML, Fu T, Krupnick A, Liu J-T, et al. 1997. Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 34:107-126
47. Alberini A, Cropper M, Krupnick A, Simon N. 2006. Willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: Does latency matter? J. Risk Uncertain. 32:231-245
48. Harrington WH, Portney PR. 1987. Valuing the benefits of health and safety regulation. J. Urban Econ. 22:101-112
49. Young RA. 2005. Determining the Economic Value ofWater: Concepts and Methods.Washington, DC: Resour. Future
50. Hanemann WM. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8:19-43
51. Diamond P, Hausman J. 1994. Is some number better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect. 8:45-64
52. Mitchell R, Carson R. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington, DC: Resour. Future
53. Hanemann WM. 1984.Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66:332-341
54. Carson RT, Hanemann WM. 2005. Contingent valuation. See Ref. 5, pp. 821-936
55. Boyle KJ, DesvousgesWH,Johnson FR, DunfordRW,Hudson SP. 1994. An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent valuation studies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 27:64-83
56. Carson RT, Mitchell RC. 1995. Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 28:155-173
57. Smith VK, Osborne LL. 1996. Do contingent valuation estimates pass a "scope" test? A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 31:287-301
58. Carson RT. 1997. Contingent valuation surveys and tests of insensitivity to scope. In Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, ed. RJ Kopp,WPommerhene, N Schwartz, 6:127-163 Boston: Kluwer
59. Hoehn JP, Randall A. 1987. A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 14:226-247
60. Dziegielewska D, Mendelsohn R. 2007. Does no mean no? A protester methodology. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38:71-87
61. Knetsch J, Sinden J. 1984. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of values. Q. J. Econ. 99:507-521
62. Horowitz JK, McConnell KE. 2002. A review ofWTA/WTP studies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 44:426-447
63. Arrow KJ, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Adm., Damage Assess. Restor. Program, Silver Spring, MD
64. Shogren J. 2005. Experimental methods and valuation. See Ref. 5, pp. 969-1027
65. Cummings R, Taylor L. 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:649-665
66. US Environ. Prot. Agency, Off. Air Radiat./Off. Policy. 1999. Benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990-2010. EPA Rep. to Congress, EPA-410-R-99-1001,Washington, DC
67. Muller N, Mendelsohn R. 2007. Measuring the aggregate damages of air pollution in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54:1-14
68. Muller N, Mendelsohn R. 2009. Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Am. Econ. Rev. 99: In press
69. Robinson LA. 2007. How US government agencies value mortality risk reductions. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy. 1:283-299
70. Viscusi WK, MagatWA, Huber J. 1991. Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of riskrisk and risk-dollar tradeoffs for chronic bronchitis. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 21:32-51
71. Krupnick AJ, Cropper ML. 1992. The effect of information on health risk valuation. J. Risk Uncert. 5:29-48
72. Alberini A, Krupnick A. 2002. Valuing the health effects of pollution. See Ref. 151, pp. 233-277
73. Nichols AL. 1997. Lead in gasoline. See Ref. 152, pp. 49-86
74. Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Mansur E, Austin D, Farrell D. 1998. Costs and benefits of reducing air pollutants related to acid rain. Contemp. Econ. Policy 16:379-400
75. Smith VK, Huang J-C. 1995. Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. J. Polit. Econ. 103:209-227
76. Freeman AM III. 1982. Air and Water Pollution Control: A Benefit-Cost Assessment. New York:Wiley
77. Hammitt JK. 1997. Stratospheric ozone depletion. See Ref. 152, pp. 131-169
78. US Environ. Prot. Agency, Off. Air Radiat. 1987. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone.Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency
79. Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C, eds. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 976 pp.
80. Schlenker W, HanemannWM,Fischer A. 2005.Will US agriculture really benefit from global warming? Accounting for irrigation in the hedonic approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:395-406
81. Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R. 2008. A Ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on African cropland. Afr. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2:1-23
82. Adams R, McCarl B, Segerson K, Rosenzweig C, Bryant K, et al. 1999. The economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. See Ref. 150, pp. 18-54
83. Seo N, Mendelsohn R. 2008. A Ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on South American farms. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 68:69-79
84. Neumann J, Livesay N. 2001. Coastal structures: dynamic economic modeling. In Global Warming and the American Economy: A Regional Assessment of Climate Change Impacts, ed. R Mendelsohn, pp. 132-148 Cheltenham, UK: Elgar
85. Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R, Sedjo R. 2002. A global model of climate change impacts on timber markets. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 26:326-343
86. Cutler D, Miller G. 2005. The role of public health improvements in health advances: the twentiethcentury United States. Demography 42:1-22
87. Soares RR. 2007. Health and the evolution of welfare across Brazilian municipalities. J. Dev. Econ. 84:590-608
88. Whittington D, Briscoe J, Mu X, Barron W. 1990. Estimating the willingness to pay for water services in developing countries: a case study of the use of contingent valuation surveys in southern Haiti. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 38:293-311
89. Pattanayak SK, van den Berg C, Yang J-C, Van Houtven G. 2006. The use of willingness to pay experiments: estimating demand for piped water connections in Sri Lanka. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 3818, Washington, DC
90. Abt Associates, Inc. 2000. Proposed arsenic in drinking water rule regulatory impact analysis. Rep. EPA 815-R-00-013, US Environ. Prot. Agency, Bethesda, MD
91. USEnviron. Prot. Agency, Off.Water. 1999. Regulatory impact analysis and revised health risk reduction and cost analysis for radon in drinking water. Rep. EPA-815-D-99-1002,Washington, DC
92. Carson RT, Mitchell RC. 1993. The value of clean water: the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resour. Res. 29:2445-2454
93. Lyon RM, Farrow S. 1995. An economic analysis of CleanWater Act issues.Water Resour. Res. 31:213-223
94. Leggett CG, Bockstael NE. 2000. Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 39:121-144
95. Morgan C, Owens N. 2001. Benefits of water quality policies: the Chesapeake Bay. Ecol. Econ. 39:271-284
96. Bockstael NE, Hanemann WM, Kling CL. 1987. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreational demand framework. Water Resour. Res. 23:951-960
97. Massey DM, Newbold SC, Gentner B. 2006. Valuing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 52:482-500
98. Montgomery M, Needelman M. 1997. The welfare effects of toxic contamination in freshwater fish. Land Econ. 73:211-223
99. Day B, Mourato S. 2002. Valuing river water quality in China. In Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries: Case Studies, ed. D Pearce, C Pearce, C Palmer, 3:25-66. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar
100. Choe K, Whittington D, Lauria DT. 1996. The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: a case study of Davao, Philippines. Land Econ. 72:519-537
101. Hamilton JT, Viscusi WK. 1999. How costly is clean? An analysis of the benefits and costs of Superfund site remediations. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 18:2-27
102. Gayer T, Hamilton JT, Viscusi WK. 2000. Private values of risk tradeoffs at Superfund sites: housing market evidence on learning about risk. Rev. Econ. Stat. 82:439-451
103. Kohlhase JE. 1991. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. J. Urban Econ. 30:1-26
104. Kiel KA. 1995. Measuring the impact of the discovery and cleaning of identified hazardous waste sites on house values. Land Econ. 71:428-435
105. McCluskey JJ, Rausser GC. 2003. Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45:166-176
106. Michaels RG, Smith VK. 1990. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites. J. Urban Econ. 28:223-242
107. Ihlanfeldt KR, Taylor LO. 2004. Externality effects of small-scale hazardous waste sites: evidence from urban commercial property markets. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 47:117-139
108. Greenstone M, Gallagher J. 2008. Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the Superfund program. MIT Dep. Econ.Work. Pap. 05-27. Cambridge, MA
109. Kiel KA, Williams M. 2007. The impact of Superfund sites on local property values: Are all sites the same? J. Urban Econ. 61:170-192
110. Freeman AM III. 1991. Valuing environmental resources under alternative management regimes. Ecol. Econ. 3:247-256
111. Natl. Res. Counc. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
112. Polasky S. 2008. What's nature done for you lately: measuring the value of ecosystem services. Choices 23:42-46
113. Nelson E, Polasky S, Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ, Lonsdorf E, et al. 2008. Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:9471-9476
114. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:4-11
115. Polasky S, Nelson E, Camm J, Csuti B, Fackler P, et al. 2008. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol. Conserv. 141:1505-1524
116. Olmstead SM, Hanemann WM, Stavins RN. 2007. Water demand under alternative price structures. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54:181-198
117. Scheierling SM, Loomis JB, Young RA. 2006. Irrigation water demand: a meta-analysis of price elasticities. Water Resour. Res. 42:W01411
118. Renzetti S. 2002. The Economics of Water Demands. London: Kluwer Acad.
119. Colby BG. 1989. Estimating the value of water in alternative uses. Nat. Resour. J. 29:511-527
120. Daubert J, Young R. 1979. Economic Benefits from Instream Flow in a Colorado Mountain Stream. Colo. Water Resour. Res. Inst. Completion Rep. 91, Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, CO
121. Whitehead JC. 2006. A comparison of contingent valuation method and random utility model estimates of the value of avoiding reductions in king mackerel bag limits. Appl. Econ. 38:1725-1735
122. Loomis J. 1987. The economic value of instream flow: methodology and benefit estimates for optimum flows. J. Environ. Manag. 24:169-179
123. Brander LM, Florax RJGM, Vermaat JE. 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ. Resour. Econ. 33:223-250
124. Barbier EB. 2000.Valuing the environment as input: review of applications to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecol. Econ. 35:47-61
125. Acharya G. 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 35:63-74
126. Breaux A, Farber S, Day J. 1995. Using natural coastal wetlands systems for wastewater treatment: an economic benefit analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 44:285-291
127. Creel M, Loomis J. 1992. Recreation value of water to wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley: linked multinomial logit and count data trip frequency models. Water Resour. Res. 28:2597-2606
128. Cooper J, Loomis J. 1993. Testing whether waterfowl hunting benefits increase with greater water deliveries to wetlands. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3:545-561
129. Bell FW. 1997. The economic valuation of saltwater marsh supporting marine recreational fishing in the southeastern United States. Ecol. Econ. 21:243-254
130. Mahan BL, Polasky S, Adams RM. 2000. Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach. Land Econ. 76:100-113
131. Croitoru L. 2007.Valuing the nontimber forest products in the Mediterranean region. Ecol. Econ. 63:768-775
132. Starbuck CM, Alexander SJ, Berrens RP, Bohara AK. 2004. Valuing special forest products harvesting: a two-step travel cost recreation demand analysis. J. For. Econ. 10:37-53
133. Garrod G,Willis K. 1992. The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain: a comparison of estimates. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2:415-434
134. Pattanayak SK, Kramer RA. 2001.Worth of watersheds: a producer surplus approach for valuing drought mitigation in eastern Indonesia. Environ. Dev. Econ. 6:123-146
135. Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Michener CD. 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12579-12582
136. Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R. 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85:448-457
137. Kramer RA, Mercer DE. 1997. Valuing a global environmental good: U.S. residents' willingness to pay to protect tropical rain forests. Land Econ. 73:196-210
138. Adams C, Seroa da Motta R, Ortiz RA, Reid J, Aznar CE, de Almeida Sinisgalli PA. 2008. The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world. Ecol. Econ. 66:359-370
139. Loomis J, Larson D. 1994. Total economic values of increasing gray whale populations: results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and households. Mar. Resour. Econ. 9:275-286
140. Simpson RD, Sedjo RA, Reid JW. 1996. Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. J. Polit. Econ. 104:163-185
141. Loomis JB, White DS. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and metaanalysis. Ecol. Econ. 18:197-206
142. Rubin J, Helfand G, Loomis J. 1991. A benefit-cost analysis of the northern spotted owl. J. Forestry 89:25-30
143. Kontoleon A, Swanson T. 2003. The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: Can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation? Land Econ. 79:483-499
144. Bowker JM, Stoll JR. 1988. Use of dichotomous choice nonmarket methods to value the whooping crane resource. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 70:372-381
145. Brown GM, Shogren JF. 1998. Economics of the endangered species act. J. Econ. Perspect. 12:3-20
146. Stanley DL. 2005. Local perception of public goods: recent assessments of willingness-to-pay for endangered species. Contemp. Econ. Policy 23:165-179
147. van der Heide CM, van den Bergh JCJM, van Ierland EC, Nunes P. 2008. Economic valuation of habitat defragmentation: a study of the Veluwe, the Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 67:205-216
148. Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T. 2006. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol. Econ. 58:304-317
149. Adamowicz WL. 2004. What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 48:419-443
150. Mendelsohn R, Neumann J, eds. 1999. The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
151. Tietenberg T, Folmer H, eds. 2002. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2002/2003. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar
152. Morgenstern RD. 1997. Economic Analyses at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact.Washington, DC: Resour. Future