Local perception of public goods: Recent assessments of willingness-to-pay for endangered species

Contemporary Economic Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 165-179

  Stanley, Denise L ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944470326     PISSN: 10743529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cep/byi013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amigues, J.P., C. Boulatoff, B. Desiagues, C. Gauthier, and J. Keith. "The Benefits and Costs of Riparian Analysis Habitat Preservation: A Willingness to Accept/Willingness to Pay Contingent Valuation Approach." Ecological Economics, 43, 2002, 17-31.
2. AAFRC (American Association of Fundraising Counsel). Giving USA 2002: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2001. Indianapolis, IN: Center on Philanthrophy at Indiana University/AAFRC Trust for Philanthrophy, 2002.
3. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H. "Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation." Federal Register, 58(10), 1993, 4602-14.
4. Bateman, I., I. Langford, N. Nishikawa, and I. Lake. "The Axford Debate Revisited: A Case Study Illustrating Different Approaches to the Aggregation of Benefits Data." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43, 2000, 291-302.
5. Bishop, R. "Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 1978, 10-18.
6. Bowker, J., and J. Stoll. "Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 1988, 372-81.
7. Boyle, K. "Contingent Valuation in Practice." Chapter 5 in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, edited by P. Champ, K. Boyle, and T. Brown. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
8. Boyle, K., and R. Bishop. "Valuing Wildlife in Benefit-Cost Analyses: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species." Water Resources Research, 23, 1987, 943-50.
9. Brown, T., P. Champ, R. Bishop, and D. McCollum. "Which Response Format Reveal the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?" Land Economics, 72, 1996, 152-66.
10. Cameron, T., W. Shaw, S. Ragland, S. Keefe, and J. Callaway. "Using Distance and Zip Code Census Information for Nonresponse Correction in the Analysis of Mail Survey Data." UCLA Department of Economics Working Paper #751, April 1996.
11. Champ, P., N. Flores, T. Brown, and J. Chivers. "Contingent Valuation and Incentives." Land Economics, 78, 2002, 591-604.
12. Dillman, D. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley, 1978.
13. Garrod, G., and K. Willis. "The Environmental Economic Ompact of Woodland: A 2-Stage Hedonic Price Model of the Amenity Value of Forestry in Britain." Applied Economics, 24(7), 1992, 715-28.
14. _. Economic Valuation of the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1999.
15. Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan, 1993.
16. Hagen, D., J. Vincent, and P. Welle. "Benefits of Preserving Old Growth Forests and the Spotted Owl." Contemporary Policy Issues, 10, 1992, 13-25.
17. Haldane, D. "Cost of Songbird Habitat Put at $5.5 Billion." Los Angeles Times, 3 August 2000, p. 5.
18. Irwin, E., and N. Bockstael. "The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 2001, 698-704.
19. Jakobsson, K., and A. Dragun. Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Applications. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1996.
20. Kotchen, M., and S. Reiling. "Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species." Ecological Economics, 32, 2000, 93-107.
21. Krupnick, A., W. Harrington, and A. Alberini. "Public Support for Motor Vehicles with Revenue Recycling: Survey Results." Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, 2001, 505-22.
22. Kwak, S., S. Yoo, and S. Han. "Estimating the Public's Value for Urban Forest in the Seoul Metropolitan Area of Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study." Urban Studies, 40, 2003, 2207-21.
23. Loomis, J. "Balancing Public Trust Resources of Mono Lake and Los Angeles' Water Right: An Economic Approach." Water Resources Research, 23, 1987, 1449-56.
24. _. "Measuring the Economic Benefits of Removing Dams and Restoring the Elwha River." Water Resources Research, 32, 1996, 441-47.
25. _. "An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions." Land Economics, 76, 2000, 312-21.
26. Loomis, J., and E. Ekstrand. "Economic Benefits of Critical Habitat for the Mexican Spotted Owl: A Scope Test Using a Multiple-Bounded Contingent Valuation Survey." Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22, 1997, 356-66.
27. Loomis, J., and D. Larson. "Total Economic Values of Increasing Gray Whale Populations: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey of Visitors and Households." Marine Resource Economics, 9, 1994, 275-86.
28. Loomis, J., L. Bair, and A. Gonzalez-Caban. "Language-Related Differences in a Contingent Valuation Study: English versus Spanish." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 2002, 1091-102.
29. Ludwig, J., and P. Cook. "The Benefits of Reducing Gun Violence: Evidence from Contingent-Valuation Survey Data." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22, 2001, 207-26.
30. McDaniel, S., C. Madden, and P. Verille. "Do Topic Differences Affect Survey Non-Response?" Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 1987, 55-66.
31. Mehta, S. "Endangered Mice Have it Nice." Los Angeles Times, 7 April 2002, p. B1.
32. Mitchell, R., and S. Carson. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1989.
33. Reaves, D.W., R. Kramer, and T. Holmes. "Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species." Environmental and Resource Economics, 14, 1999, 365-83.
34. Romer, A., W. Pommerehne, and L. Feld. "Revealing Preferences for Reductions of Public Risks: An Application of the CV Approach." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, 1998, 477-504.
35. Rowe, R., W. Schulze, and W. Breffle. "A Test for Payment Card Biases." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 1996, 178-85.
36. Rubin, J., G. Helfand, and J. Loomis. "A Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Northern Spotted Owl." Journal of Forestry, 89, 1991, 25-30.
37. Shackley, P., and S. Dixon. "Using Contingent Valuation to Elicit Public Preferences for Water Fluoridation." Applied Economics, 32, 2000, 777-80.
38. Stevens, T., R. Echeverria, J. Glass, T. Hager, and T. More. "Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?" Land Economics, 67, 1991, 390-400.
39. Stumborg, B., K. Baerenklau, and R. Bishop. "Nonpoint Source Pollution and Pres ent Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Lake Mendota." Review of Agricultural Economics, 23, 2000, 120-32.
40. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Recovery Plan for the Vernal Pools of Southern California." U.S. Department of Interior, FWS, Region 1, Portland, Oregon, 1998.
41. _. "Recovery Plan for the Arroyo Southwestern Toad." U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, 1999.