Sex ratio drive promotes sexual conflict and sexual coevolution in the fly drosophila pseudoobscura

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1504-1509

  Price, Tom A R ^a   Lewis, Zenobia ^b   Smith, Damian T ^a   Hurst, Gregory D D ^c   Wedell, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Experimental evolution; Meiotic drive; Polyandry; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COEVOLUTION; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; FLY; GENE TRANSFER; HERITABILITY; POLYANDRY; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA;

EID: 77953743308     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00896.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersson M. Sexual conflict 1994, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 2002, 415:787-789.
3. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Sexual conflict 2005, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Baer B, Morgan E, Schmid-Hempel P. A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98:3926-3928.
5. Bateman A J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
6. Beckenbach A T. Multiple mating and the " sex-ratio" trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1981, 35:275-281.
7. Beukeboom L W. Phenotypic fitness effects on the selfish B-chromosome, paternal sex-ratio (PSR) in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:1-24.
8. Bryant S H, Beckenbach A T, Cobbs G. Sex ratio, sex composition, and relative abundance in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1982, 36:27-34.
9. Burt A, Trivers R. Genes in conflict: the biology of selfish genetic elements 2006, Harvard Univ. Press, Harvard
10. Cameron E, Day T, Rowe L. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:1055-1060.
11. Champion de Crespigny F E, Wedell N. Wolbachia infection reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 2006, 273:1455-1458.
12. Crudgington H, Fellows S, Badcock N, Snook R. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution 2009, 63:926-938.
13. Dobzhansky T, Epling C. Contributions to the genetics, taxonomy, and ecology of Drosophila pseudoobscura and its relatives 1944, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C
14. Haig D, Bergstrom C T. Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. J. Evol. Biol. 1995, 8:265-282.
15. Hosken D J, Stockley P. Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol. Biol. 2003, 33:173-194.
16. Hurst L D, Pomiankowski A. Causes of sex-ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation for Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 1991, 128:841-858.
17. Hurst G D D, Werren J H. The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nat. Genet. 2001, 2:597-606.
18. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comp. Graph. Stats. 1996, 5:299-314.
19. Jaenike J. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in the Drosophila quinaria group. Am. Nat. 1996, 148:237-254.
20. Jaenike J. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32:25-49.
21. Jennions M D, Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 2000, 175:21-64.
22. Jiggins F, Hurst G, Majerus M. How common are meiotically driving sex chromosomes?. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:481-483.
23. Kubli E. Sex peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60:1689-1704.
24. Letsinger J T, Gromko M H. The role of sperm numbers in sperm competition and female remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 1985, 66:195-202.
25. Markow T A. Female remating, operational sex ratio, and the arena of sexual selection in Drosophila species. Evolution 2002, 56:1725-1734.
26. Montrose V T, Harris W E, Moore P J. Sexual conflict and cooperation under naturally occurring male enforced monogamy. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:443-452.
27. Parker G. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects 1979, 123-166. Blum MBlum N. Pp, , eds, Academic Press, New York
28. Parker G A. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2006, 361:235-259.
29. Polak M, Wolf L L, Starmer W T, Barker J S F. Function of the mating plug in Drosophila hibisci Bock. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2001, 49:196-205.
30. Policansky D, Ellison J. " Sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure. Science 1970, 169:888-889.
31. Powell J. Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: the Drosophila model 1997, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
32. Price T A R, Wedell N. Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility. Genetica 2008, 132:295-307.
33. Price T A R, Bretman A J, Avent T D, Snook R R, Hurst G D D, Wedell N. Sex ratio distorter reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Evolution 2008a, 62:1644-1652.
34. Price T A R, Hodgson D J, Lewis Z, Hurst G D D, Wedell N. Selfish genetic elements promote polyandry in a fly. Science 2008b, 322:1241-1243.
35. Rajendra T K, Prasanth K V, Lakhotia S C. Male sterility associated with overexpression of the noncoding hsr omega gene in cyst cells of testis of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 2001, 80:97-110.
36. Ravi Ram K, Wolfner M F. Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between males and females during reproduction. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2007, 47:427-445.
37. Rice W. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 1996, 381:232-234.
38. Rönn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:10921-10925.
39. Shorrocks B. Invertebrate types: Drosophila 1972, Ginn & Co., London
40. Sturtevant A H, Dobzhansky T. Geographical distribution and cytology of " sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura and related species. Genetics 1936, 21:473-490.
41. Taylor D R, Ingvarsson P K. Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 2003, 117:27-35.
42. Tregenza T, Wedell N. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1013-1027.
43. Turner M, Anderson W. Sperm predominance among Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Evolution 1984, 38:983-995.
44. Wedell N, Kvarnemo C, Lessells C, Tregenza T. Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71:999-1011.
45. Wigby S, Chapman T. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:316-321.
46. Wilkinson G S, Presgraves D C, Crymes L. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 1998, 391:276-279.
47. Wu C-I. Virility deficiency and the sex-ratio trait in Drososphila pseudoobscura. I. Sperm displacement and sexual selection. Genetics 1983, 105:651-662.
48. Zeh J A, Zeh D W. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264:69-75.