Sexual conflict and cooperation under naturally occurring male enforced monogamy

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 443-452

  Montrose, V T ^a   Harris, W E ^a   Moore, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enforced monogamy; Nauphoeta cinerea; Sexual conflict; Sperm depletion

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; POLYANDRY; SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COCKROACH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SPERMATOZOON;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COCKROACHES; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SPERMATOZOA;

ANIMALIA; BLABERIDAE; BLATTARIA; DICTYOPTERA; NAUPHOETA CINEREA;

EID: 1542319024     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00654.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
2. Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behav. 60: 145-164.
3. Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
4. Birkhead, T.R. & Moller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
5. Buschor, J., Beyeler, P. & Lanzrein, B. 1984. Factors responsible for the initiation of a second oocyte maturation cycle in the ovoviviparous cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea. J. Insect Physiol. 30: 241-249.
6. Chapman, T. 2001. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87: 511-521.
7. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
8. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. TREE 18: 41-47.
9. Clark, D.C., DeBano, S.J. & Moore A.J. 1997. The influence of environmental quality on sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae). Behav. Ecol. 8: 46-53.
10. Dewsbury, D.A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119: 601-610.
11. Eberhard, W.G. 1998. Female roles in sperm competition. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Moller, eds), pp. 91-116. Academic Press, London.
12. Gillot, C. 2003. Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 48: 163-184.
13. Gowaty, P.A. 1996. Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Partnerships in Birds (J. M. Black, ed.), pp. 21-52. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Gowaty, P.A. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in reproductive behavior. In: Feminism and Evolutionary Biology (P. A. Gowaty, ed.), pp. 351-384. Chapman & Hall, New York.
15. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7.
16. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083-5088.
17. Hosken, D.J. & Stockley, P. 2003. Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol. Biol. 33: 173-194.
18. Hunter, P.M. & Birkhead, T.R. 2002. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr. Biol. 12: 121-123.
19. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 21-64.
20. Jones, T. 2001. A potential cost of monandry in the lekking sandfly Lutzomyia Longipalpis. J. Insect Behav. 14: 385-399.
21. Jones, A.G., Adams, E.M. & Arnold, S.J. 2002. Topping off: a mechanism of first-male sperm precedence in a vertebrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2078-2081.
22. Keller, L. & Reeve, H.K. 1995. Why do females mate with multiple males - the sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Behav. 24: 291-315.
23. Kolodziejczyk, M. & Radwan, J. 2003. The effect of mating frequency on female lifetime fecundity in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini (Acari: Acaridae). Behav. Ecol. Socio. 53: 110-115.
24. Moore, A.J. 1988. Female preferences, male social status, and sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea. An. Behav. 36: 303-305.
25. Moore, A.J. 1990a. The inheritance of social dominance, mating behaviour and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. An. Behav. 39: 388-397.
26. Moore, A.J. 1990b. Sexual selection and the genetics of pheromonally mediated social behavior in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae). Entom. Gen. 15: 133-147.
27. Moore, A.J. & Moore, P.J. 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 711-716.
28. Moore, A.J. & Moore, P.J. 2001. Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9171-9176.
29. Moore, P.J & Moore, A.J. 2003. Developmental flexibility and the effect of social environment on fertility and fecundity in parthenogenetic reproduction. Evolution & Development 5: 163-168.
30. Moore, P.J., Reagan-Wallin, N.L., Haynes, K.F. & Moore, A.J. 1997. Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389: 25.
31. Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A., Wallin, W.G. & Moore, P.J. 2001. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 517-523.
32. Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A. & Moore, P.J. 2003. Females avoid manipulative males and live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 523-530.
33. Nakatsuru, K. & Kramer, D.L. 1982. Is sperm cheap - limited male-fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216: 753-755.
34. Pitnick, S., Brown, W.D., & Miller, G.T. 2001a. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 557-563.
35. Pitnick, S., Miller, G.T., Reagan, J. & Holland, B. 2001b. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1071-1080.
36. Pizzari, T. & Snook, R.R. 2003. Sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57: 1223-1236.
37. Preston, B.T., Stevenson, I.R., Pemberton, J.M. & Wilson, K. 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion - a waning success in siring counters a ram's high score in competition for ewes. Nature 409: 681-682.
38. Promislow, D., Smith, E. & Pearse, L. 1998. Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 10 687-10 692.
39. Reynolds, J. 1996. Animal breeding systems. TREE 11: 68-72.
40. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 361: 232-234.
41. Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R.L. 1985. Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
42. Roth, L.M. 1964a. Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. I. First pre-oviposition period. J. Insect Physiol. 10: 915-945.
43. Roth, L.M. 1964b. Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. II. Gestation and postparturition. Psyche 71: 198-244.
44. Roth, L.M. & Willis, E.R. 1954. The reproduction of cockroaches. Smiths. Misc. Coll. 122: 1-49.
45. Sella, G. & Lorenzi, M.C. 2003. Increased sperm allocation delays body growth in a protandrous simultaneous hermaphrodite. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 78: 149-154.
46. Snook, R. 2001. Sexual selection: conflict, kindness and chicanery. Curr. Biol. 11: 337-341.
47. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1013-1027.
48. Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (B. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136-179. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.
49. Van Voorhies, W.A. 1992. Production of sperm reduces nematode life-span. Nature 360: 456-458.
50. Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G. & Parker, G.A. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. TREE 17: 313-320.
51. Wilkinson, L., Blank, G. & Gruber, C. 1996. Desktop Data Analysis with SYSTAT. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
52. Yasui, Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female mating reconsidered. TREE 13: 246-250.
53. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 2001. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. An. Behav. 61: 1051-1063.