Attempting to hide our real thoughts: Electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 479, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-5

  Dong, Guangheng ^a   Wu, Haiyan ^a   Lu, Qilin ^b,c  

^a ZHEJIANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; ERP; Evaluation; Executive process

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HONESTY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; SLOW BRAIN WAVE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; COGNITION; DECEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FACE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; COGNITION; CUES; DECEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953694680     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bendixen A., Grimm S., Schröger E. Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 383:284-288.
2. Berti S., Geissler H.G., Lachmann T., Mecklinger A. Event-related brain potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorial and identical comparison conditions. Cognitive Brain Research 2000, 9:147-155.
3. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 8:539-546.
4. Bush G., Luu P., Posner M.I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:215-222.
5. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280:747-749.
6. Cercy S.P., Schretlen D., Brandt J. Simulated amnesia and the pseudo-memory phenomena. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception 1997, 85-107. Guilford Press, New York. R.J. Rogers (Ed.).
7. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behavioral Brain Science 1988, 11:355-372.
8. Doucet C., Stelmack R.M. The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:351-363.
9. Ganis G, Kosslyn S.M., Stose S. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:830-836.
10. Isen A.M. An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2008, 11:75-85.
11. Jacobsen T., Ricarda I., Schubotz R.I., Hofel L., Cramonb Y. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage 2006, 29:276-285.
12. Johnson R.J., Barnhardt J., Zhu J. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:217-253.
13. Johnson R.J., Barnhardt J., Zhu J. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:878-901.
14. Johnson R.J., Henkell H., Simon E., Zhu J. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes. NeuroImage 2008, 39:469-482.
15. King J.W., Kutas M. Who did what and when? Using word and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995, 7:376-395.
16. Kozel F.A., Johnson K.A., Mu Q., Grenesko E., Laken S., George M. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry 2005, 58:605-613.
17. Langleben D.D., Loughead J.W., Bilker W.B., Ruparel K., Childress A.R., Busch S.I., Gu R.C. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 26:262-272.
18. Leuthold H., Sommer W. Post-perceptual effects and P300 latency. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:34-46.
19. Macar F., Vidal F., Casini L. The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 125:271-280.
20. Mecklinger A., Pfeifer E. Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 4:211-224.
21. Pfeuty M., Ragot R., Pouthas V. When time is up: CNV time course differentiates the roles of the hemispheres in the discrimination of short tone durations. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 151:372-379.
22. Phan K.L., Magalhaes A. Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Acadamic Radiology 2005, 12:164-172.
23. Rosenfeld J.P., Ellwanger J.W., Nolan K., Wu S., Bermann R.G., Sweet J. P300 Scalp amplitude distribution as an index of deception in a simulated cognitive deficit model. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1999, 33:3-19.
24. Ruchkin D.S., Johnson R., Grafman J., Canoune H., Ritter W. Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research 1992, 1:53-66.
25. Sip K.E., Roepstorff A., McGregor W., Frith C.D. Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Science 2007, 12:48-53.
26. Spence S.A., Farrow T.F., Herford A.E. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 2001, 12:2849-2853.
27. Van Veen V., Carter C.S. Conflict and cognitive control in the brain. Psychological Science 2006, 15:237-240.
28. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge W.C., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
29. Werheid K., Schacht A., Sommer W. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology 2007, 76:100-108.