Postperceptual effects and p300 latency

Psychophysiology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 34-46

  Leuthold, Hartmut ^a   Sommer, Werner ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Mental chronometry; Motoric processes; P300 latency; Spatial S R compatibility; Stimulus evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0031974152     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0048577298960553     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Biederman, I., & Kaplan, R. (1970). Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 434-439.
2. Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571.
3. Christensen, C., Ford, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1996). The effect of stimulus-response incompatibility on P3 latency depends on the task but not on age. Biological Psychology, 44, 121-141.
4. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
5. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
6. Coles, M. G. H., Smid, H. G. O. M., Scheffers, M. K., & Otten, L. J. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86-131). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Dc Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
8. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
9. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940.
10. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1993). Late visual and auditory ERP components and choice reaction time. Biological Psychology, 92, 148-160.
11. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1994). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuro-physiology, 92, 148-160.
12. Fiori, N., Ragot, R., & Renault, B. (1992). Effect of target position on the sequential organization of processing stages. Biological Psychology, 33, 157-171.
13. Fitzpatrick, P., Klorman, R., Brumaghim, J. T., & Keefover, R. W. (1988). Effects of methylphenidate on stimulus evaluation and response processes: Evidence from performance and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology: 25, 292-304.
14. Ford, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1985). Age-related changes in event-related potentials. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 1, pp. 69-138), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., Mohs, R. C., Hopkins, W. F. & Kopell, B. S. (1979). Event-related potentials recorded from young and old adults during a memory retrieval task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 47, 450-459.
16. Freund, H. J., & Büdingen, H. J. (1978). The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles. Experimental Brain Research, 31, 1-12.
17. Frowein, H. W., & Sanders, A. F. (1978). Effects of visual stimulus degradation. S-R compatibility, and foreperiod duration on choice reaction time and movement time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 106-108.
18. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1989). A procedure for using multi-electrode information in the analysis of components of the event- related potential: Vector filter. Psychophysiology, 26, 222-232.
19. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
20. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
21. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S., (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
22. Jasper, H. H. (1958). Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electrocncephalography. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 370-375.
23. Johnson, R., Jr. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 69-138), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
25. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
26. Leuthold, H. (1994). Analysis of spatial S-R compatibility and the Simon effect by means of overt behavioral and electrophysiological measures: Automatic response activation as a common basis? Konstanz, Germany: Hartung-Gorre Verlag.
27. Leuthold, H. & Sommer, W. (1995). Spatial S-R compatibility and Simon effect: Response competition as common underlying mechanism. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrated review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
29. Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, F. (1984). On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psy-chophysiology, 21, 171-186.
30. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211, 77-80.
31. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
32. Miller, J., Franz, V., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Effects of stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go-no-go, and choice RT tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33. Mulder, G., Gloerich, A. B. M., Brookhuis, K. A., van Dellen, H. J., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1984). Stage analysis of the reaction process using brain-evoked potentials and reaction time. Psychological Research, 46, 15-32.
34. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673.
35. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 164-169.
36. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
37. Pfefferbaum, A., Christensen, C. Ford, J. M., & Kopell, B. S. (1986). Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 64, 424-437.
38. Ragot, R. (1984). Perceptual and motor space representation: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 21, 159-170.
39. Ragot, R., & Fiori, N. (1994). Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: An ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility. Psychophysiology, 31, 439-446.
40. Ragot, R. & Renault, B. (1981). P300 as a function of S-R compatibility and motor programming. Biological Psychology, 13, 289-294.
41. Ragot, R. & Renault, B. (1985). P300 and S-R compatibility: A reply to Magliero et al. Psychophysiology, 22, 349-352.
42. Renault, B., Fiori, N., & Giami, S. (1988). Latencies of event related potentials as a tool for studying motor processing organization. Biological Psychology, 26, 217-230.
43. Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1972). Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, 547-555.
44. Romaiguère, P., Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C.-A., & Seal, J. (1993). Intensity to force translation: A new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 197-201.
45. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123-167.
46. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L., (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.
48. Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., & Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psycho-logica, 47, 63-81.
49. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 1-33.
50. Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
51. Smulders, F. T. Y. Kok, A., Kenemans, J L., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies. Acta Psychologica, 90, 97-109.
52. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Hermanutz, M. (1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials. Perception and Psycho-physics, 54, 127-135.
53. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
54. Strayer D. L., Wickens, C. D., & Braune, R. (1987). Adult age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: 2. An elcctrophysiological approach. Psychology and Aging, 2, 99-110.
55. Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 972-990.
56. Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. (1996). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Manuscript submitted for publication.
57. Van der Molen, M. W. Bashore, T. R., Halliday, R., & Callaway, E. (1991). Chronopsychophysiology: Mental chronometry augmented by psycho-physiological time markers. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and automatic nervous system approaches (pp. 9-178). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
58. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
59. Verleger, R., & Wascher, E. (1995). Fitting ex-Gauss functions to P3 wave-shapes: An attempt at distinguishing between real and apparent changes of P3 latency. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 146-158.
60. Zeef, E. J., & Kok, A. (1993). Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: Performance and psychophysiological analysis. Psychophyosiology, 30, 138-151.