Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Vlemmix, Floortje ^a   Rosman, Ageeth N ^a   Fleuren, Margot A H ^b   Rijnders, Marlies E B ^b   Beuckens, Antje ^c   Haak, Monique C ^d   Akerboom, Bettina M C ^e   Bais, Joke M J ^f   Kuppens, Simone M I ^g   Papatsonis, Dimitri N ^h   Opmeer, Brent C ^a   van der Post, Joris A M ^a   Mol, Ben Willem J ^a   Kok, Marjolein ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

^c KNOV   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ALBERT SCHWEITZER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f Location Alkmaar   (Netherlands)

^g CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^h AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION; HUMAN; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; OBSTETRIC CARE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANT WOMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRATEGIC PLANNING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSE MIDWIFE; NURSING PRACTICE; OBSTETRICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; NURSE MIDWIVES; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; OBSTETRICS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH DESIGN; VERSION, FETAL;

EID: 77953673451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-20     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992, 166(3):851-852.
2. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000, 356(9239):1375-1383. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3, 11052579.
3. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, van Loon AJ, Van Hemel OJ, Visser GH. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. BJOG 2003, 110(6):604-609. 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.x, 12798480.
4. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000, 356(9239):1375-1383. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3, 11052579.
5. Kwee A, Smink M, Van Der Laar R, Bruinse HW. Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007, 20(1):33-37. 10.1080/14767050601036527, 17437197.
6. Kwee A, Smink M, Van Der Laar R, Bruinse HW. Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007, 20(1):33-37. 10.1080/14767050601036527, 17437197.
7. Bewley S, Robson SC, Smith M, Glover A, Spencer JA. The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993, 52(2):89-93. 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90233-3, 8157147.
8. Caukwell S, Joels LA, Kyle PM, Mills MS. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002, 22(5):486-488. 10.1080/0144361021000003591, 12521413.
9. Leung TY, Lau TK, Lo KW, Rogers MS. A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 40(3):253-259. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2000.tb03331.x, 11065030.
10. Raynes-Greenow CH, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Brodrick B, Peat B. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Midwifery 2004, 20(2):181-187. 10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.002, 15177862.
11. Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002, 79(3):221-224. 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00274-6, 12445986.
12. Johanson R, Burr R, Leighton N, Jones P. Informed choice? Evidence of the persuasive power of professionals. J Public Health Med 2000, 22(3):439-440. 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.439, 11077922.
13. Mason J, Freemantle N, Nazareth I, Eccles M, Haines A, Drummond M. When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals?. JAMA 2001, 286(23):2988-2992. 10.1001/jama.286.23.2988, 11743840.
14. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282(15):1458-1465. 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458, 10535437.
15. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997, 315(7105):418-421. 2127297, 9277610.
16. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003, 362(9391):1225-1230. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1, 14568747.
17. Gross PA, Greenfield S, Cretin S, Ferguson J, Grimshaw J, Grol R, et al. Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care 2001, 39(8 Suppl 2):II85-II92.
18. Peters TJ, Sanders C, Dieppe P, Donovan J. Factors associated with change in pain and disability over time: a community-based prospective observational study of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Br J Gen Pract 2005, 55(512):205-211. 1463091, 15808036.
19. Creswell C, Chalder T. The relationship between illness attributions and attributional style in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Br J Clin Psychol 2003, 42(Pt 1):101-104. 10.1348/014466503762842057, 12675983.
20. Engels Y, Verheijen N, Fleuren M, Mokkink H, Grol R. The effect of small peer group continuous quality improvement on the clinical practice of midwives in The Netherlands. Midwifery 2003, 19(4):250-258. 10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00040-8, 14623504.
21. Cantrill JA, Sibbald B, Buetow S. Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability. Qual Health Care 1998, 7(3):130-135. 10.1136/qshc.7.3.130, 2483608, 10185138.