Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm cesarean section

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-37

  Kwee, Anneke ^a   Smink, Marieke ^a   Van Der Laar, Rafli ^b   Bruinse, Hein W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Preterm cesarean section; Uterine rupture; VBAC

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; STATISTICS;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 34248598823     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050601036527     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Biswas A. Management of previous cesarean section. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:123-129.
2. Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: What's new in the new millennium? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;12:595-599.
3. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:465-470.
4. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: A risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:332-337.
5. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1187-1197.
6. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:689-695.
7. Turner MJ. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:69-79.
8. ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 2, October 1998. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician- gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:201-208.
9. Martin JN, Kenneth GP, Roberts WE, Meydrech EF. The case for trial of labor in the patient with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:144-148.
10. Halperin ME, Moore DC, Hannah WJ. Classical versus low-segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: Maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1988;95:990-996.
11. Rochelson B, Pagano M, Conetta L, Goldman B, Vohra N, Frey M, Day C. Previous preterm cesarean delivery: Identification of a new risk factor for uterine rupture in VBAC candidates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:339-342.
12. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; in press.
13. Pinion SB, Mowat J. Preterm caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:277-280.
14. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD. Williams obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. 649 p.
15. Wojdecki J, Grynsztajn A. Scar formation in the uterus after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;107:322-324.