Identification of novel genes potentially involved in somatic embryogenesis in chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Lucau Danila, Anca ^a   Laborde, Laurent ^a,b   Legrand, Sylvain ^a,c   Huot, Ludovic ^d   Hot, David ^d   Lemoine, Yves ^d   Hilbert, Jean Louis ^a   Hawkins, Simon ^a   Quillet, Marie Christine ^a   Hendriks, Theo ^a   Blervacq, Anne Sophie ^a  

^a Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies   (France)

^b NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^d INSERM U1019   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CICHORIUM INTYBUS;

DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLUCOSIDE; PHLOROGLUCINOL; PLANT RNA; YARIV REAGENT;

ARTICLE; CELL WALL; CHICORY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; DNA MICROARRAY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; PLANT GENE; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

CELL WALL; CHICORY; CULTURE MEDIA; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENOTYPE; GLUCOSIDES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHLOROGLUCINOL; RNA, PLANT; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 77953654873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-122     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Arabinogalactan-proteins in Cichorium somatic embryogenesis: effect of β-glucosyl Yariv reagent and epitope localisation during embryo development. Planta 2000, 211:305-314. 10.1007/s004250000299, 10987548.
2. Legrand S, Hendriks T, Hilbert JL, Quillet MC. Characterization of expressed sequence tags obtained by SSH during somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium intybus L. BMC Plant Biology 2007, 7:27-38. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-27, 1913917, 17553130.
3. Verdeil JL, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Tranbarger TJ. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy?. Trends in Plant Science 2007, 12(6):245-252. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002, 17499544.
4. Blervacq AS, Dubois T, Dubois J, Vasseur J. First division of somatic embryogenic cells in Cichorium hybrid « 474 ». Protoplasma 1995, 186:163-168.
5. Zhao J, Morozova N, Williams L, Libs L, Avivi Y, Grafi G. Two phases of chromatin decondensation during dedifferentiation of plant cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001, 276(25):22772-22778. 10.1074/jbc.M101756200, 11274191.
6. Robatche-Claive AS, Couillerot JP, Dubois J, Dubois T, Vasseur J. Embryogenèse somatique directe dans les feuilles du Cichorium hybride '474': synchronisation de l'induction. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 1992, 314:371-377.
7. Bellettre A, Couillerot JP, Blervacq AS, Aubert S, Gout E, Hilbert JL, Vasseur J. Glycerol effects both carbohydrate metabolism and cytosketetal rearrangements during the induction of somatic embryogenesis in chicory leaf tissues. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2001, 39:503-511.
8. Dubois J, Droujininski J, Vasseur J. Croissance et potentialités organogènes de suspensions cellulaires de Cichorium intybus L. var. witloof. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 1998, 135(Lettres botaniques 4-5):311-322.
9. Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Vasseur J. Direct somatic embryogenesis in leaves of Cichorium. A histological and SEM study of early stages. Protoplasma 1991, 164:120-127.
10. Decout E, Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Audran JC, Vasseur J. Role of temperature as a triggering signal for organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis in wounded leaves of chicory cultured in vitro. Journal of Experimental Botany 1994, 45(281):1859-1865.
11. Vasseur J, Dubois J, Hilbert JL, Couillerot JP. Somatic embryogenesis in Chicory (Cichorium species). Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry: somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed I 1995, 125-137. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Bajaj YPS.
12. Rambaud C, Blervacq AS, Devaux P, Dubois T, Dubois J, Lammin F, Vasseur J. There is no somatic meiosis in embryogenic leaves of Cichorium. Annals of Botany 1996, 78:223-232.
13. Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Tissier JP, Delbreil B, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Cell wall differentiation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants: I. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy study on embryos originating from direct, indirect, and adventitious pathways. Canadian Journal of Botany 2000, 78:816-823.
14. Du H, Clarke AE, Bacic A. Arabinogalactan-proteins: a class of extracellular matrix proteoglycans involved in plant growth and development. Trends in Cell Biology 1996, 6:411-414. 10.1016/S0962-8924(96)20036-4, 15157509.
15. Nothnagel EA. Proteoglycans and related components in plant cells. International review of cytology 1997, 174:195-291. 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62118-X, 9161008.
16. Showalter AM. Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. Plant Cell 1993, 5:9-23. 10.1105/tpc.5.1.9, 160246, 8439747.
17. Majewska-Sawka A, Nothnagel EA. The multiple roles of arabinogalactan proteins in plant development. Plant Physiology 2000, 122:3-9. 10.1104/pp.122.1.3, 1539237, 10631243.
18. Showalter AM. Arabinogalactan-proteins: structure, expression and function. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2001, 58:1399-1417. 10.1007/PL00000784, 11693522.
19. Schultz CJ, Rumsewicz MP, Johnson KL, Jones BJ, Gaspar YM, Bacic A. Using genomic resources to guide research directions. The arabinogalactan protein gene family as a test case. Plant Physiology 2002, 129:1448-1463. 10.1104/pp.003459, 166734, 12177459.
20. Knox JP. The use of antibodies to study the architecture and developmental regulation of plant cell walls. International Review of Cytology 1997, 171:79-120. full_text, 9066126.
21. Vroemen CW, de Vries S, Quatrano R. Signalling in plant embryos during the establishment of the polar axis. Cellular and Developmental Biology 1999, 10:157-164.
22. Shi H, Kim YS, Guo Y, Stevenson B, Zhu JK. The Arabidopsis SOS5 locus encodes a putative cell surface adhesion protein and is required for normal cell expansion. The Plant Cell 2003, 15:19-32. 10.1105/tpc.007872, 143448, 12509519.
23. Yariv J, Lis H, Katchalski E. Precipitation of arabic acid and some seed polysaccharides by glycosylphenylazo dyes. Biochemical Journal 1967, 105:1c-2c. 1198314, 6069833.
24. Knox JP, Linstead PJ, Peart M, Cooper C, Roberts K. Developmentally regulated epitopes of cell surface arabinogalactan proteins and their relation to root tissue pattern formation. Plant Journal 1991, 1:317-326.
25. Thompson HJM, Knox JP. Stage-specific responses of embryogenic carrot cell suspension cultures to arabinogalactan protein-binding β-glucosyl Yariv reagent. Planta 1998, 205:32-38.
26. Serpe MD, Nothnagel EA. Effects of Yariv phenylglycosides on Rosa cell suspensions: evidence for the involvement of arabinogalactan-proteins in cell proliferation. Planta 1994, 193:542-550.
27. Willats WGT, Knox JP. A role for arabinogalactan proteins in plant cell expansion: evidence from studies on the interaction of β-glucosyl Yariv reagent with seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal 1996, 9:919-925. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.9060919.x, 8696368.
28. Gao M, Showalter AM. Yariv reagent treatment induces programmed cell death in Arabidopsis cell cultures and implicates arabinogalactan protein involvement. Plant Journal 1999, 19:321-331. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00544.x, 10476079.
29. Jauh GY, Lord EM. Localisation of pectins and arabinogalactan proteins in lily (Lilium longiflorum L.) pollen tube and style, and their possible roles in pollination. Planta 1996, 199:251-261.
30. Mollet JC, Kim S, Jauh GY, Lord EM. Arabinogalactan proteins, pollen tube growth, and the reversible effects of Yariv phenylglycosides. Protoplasma 2002, 219:89-98. 10.1007/s007090200009, 11926071.
31. Tang XC, He YQ, Wang Y, Sun MX. The role of arabinogalactan proteins binding to Yariv reagents in the initiation, cell developmental fate, and maintenance of microscpore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. Journal of Experimental Botany 2006, 57:2639-2650. 10.1093/jxb/erl027, 16829548.
32. Hu Y, Qin Y, Zhao J. Localization of an arabinogalactan protein epitope and the effects of Yariv phenylglycoside during zygotic embryo development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 2006, 229:21-31. 10.1007/s00709-006-0185-z, 17019527.
33. Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Vasseur J. Direct somatic embryogenesis in roots of Cichorium: Is callose an early marker?. Annals of Botany 1990, 65:539-545.
34. Roy S, Jauh GY, Hepler PK, Lord EM. Effects of Yariv phenylglycosides on cell wall assembly in the lily pollen tube. Planta 1998, 204:450-458. 10.1007/s004250050279, 9684368.
35. Immerzeel P, Eppink M, de Vries S, Schols H, Voragena A. Carrot arabinogalactan proteins are interlinked with pectins. Physiologia Plantarum 2006, 128:18-28.
36. Guan Y, Nothnagel EA. Binding of arabinogalactan proteins by Yariv phenylglycoside triggers wound-like responses in Arabidopsis cell cultures. Plant Physiology 2004, 135:1346-1366. 10.1104/pp.104.039370, 519053, 15235117.
37. Farmer EE, Pearce G, Ryan CA. In vitro phosphorylation of plant plasma membrane proteins in response to the proteinase inhibitor inducing factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 1989, 86:1539-1542.
38. Raffaele S, Mongrand S, Gamas P, Niebel A, Ott T. Genome-wide annotation of remorins, a plant-specific protein family: evolutionary and functional perspectives. Plant Physiology 2007, 45:593-600.
39. Reymond P, Kunz B, Paul-Pletzer K, Grimm R, Eckerskorn C, Farmer EE. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a plasma membrane-associated, uronide binding phosphoprotein with physical properties similar to viral movement proteins. Plant Cell 1996, 8:2265-2276. 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2265, 161351, 8989883.
40. Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Hendriks T, Slomianny C, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Cell wall differentiation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants. II. Ultrastructural study and pectin immunolocalization on chicory embryos. Revue canadienne de botanique 2000, 78(6):824-831.
41. Vierstra RD. The ubiquitin/26 S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends in Plant Science 2003, 8:135-142. 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00014-1, 12663224.
42. Ghislain M, Udvardy A, Mann C. S. cerevisiae 26 S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature 1993, 366(6453):358-362. 10.1038/366358a0, 8247132.
43. Coutos-Thévenot P, Maës O, Jouenne T, Mauro MC, Boulay M, Deloire A, Guern J. Extracellular protein patterns of grapevine cell suspensions in embryogenic and non-embryogenic situations. Plant Science 1992, 86:137-145.
44. Coutos-Thévenot P, Jouenne T, Maës O, Guerbette F, Grosbois M, Le Caer JP, Boulay M, Deloire A, Kader JC, Guern J. Four 9-kDa Proteins excreted by somatic embryos of grapevine are isoforms of lipid-transfer proteins. European Journal of Biochemistry 1993, 217:885-889. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18317.x, 8223644.
45. Sterk P, Booij H, Schellekens GA, Van Kammen A, De Vries SC. Cell-specific expression of the carrot EP2 lipid transfer protein gene. The Plant Cell 1991, 3:907-921. 10.2307/3869154, 160059, 1822991.
46. Toonen MA, Verhees JA, Schmidt ED, van Kammen A, de Vries SC. AtLTP1 luciferase expression during carrot somatic embryogenesis. The Plant Journal 1997, 12(5):1213-1221. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.12051213.x, 9418058.
47. Blanckaert A, Belingheri L, Sautiere PE, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. 9-kDa acidic and basic nsLTP-like proteins are secreted in the culture-medium conditioned by somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2002, 40:339-345.
48. Blanckaert A, Belingheri L, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Changes in lipid composition during somatic embryogenesis in leaves of Cichorium. Plant science 2000, 157(2):165-172. 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00279-X, 10960729.
49. Nishiuchi S, Liu S, Takano T. Isolation and characterization of a metallothionein-1 protein in Chloris virgata Swartz that enhances stress tolerances to oxidative, salinity and carbonate stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Letters 2007, 29(8):1301-1305. 10.1007/s10529-007-9396-4, 17516025.
50. Earnshaw BA, Johnson MA. Control of wild carrot somatic embryo development by antioxidants. Plant Physiology 1987, 85:273-27. 10.1104/pp.85.1.273, 1054240, 16665669.
51. Gardiner CS, Salmen JJ, Brandt CJ, Stover SK. Glutathione is present in reproductive tract secretions and improves development of mouse embryos after chemically induced glutathione depletion. Biology of Reproduction 1998, 59:431-436. 10.1095/biolreprod59.2.431, 9687318.
52. Shi ZZ, Osei-Frimpong J, Kala G, Kala SV, Barrios RJ, Habib GM, Lukin DJ, Danney CM, Lieberman MW. Glutathione synthesis is essential for mouse development but not cell growth in culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 2000, 97:5101-5106.
53. Stasolla C, Belmonte MF, van Zyl L, Craig DL, Liu W, Yeung EC, Sederoff RR. The effect of reduced glutathione on morphology and gene expression of white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryos. Journal of Experimental Botany 2004, 55:695-709. 10.1093/jxb/erh074, 14966213.
54. Belmonte MF, Stasolla C. Glutathione depletion improves white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryo development. Plant Cell Reports 2007, 26:517-523. 10.1007/s00299-006-0267-6, 17111112.
55. Stasolla C, Belmonte MF, Tahir M, Elhiti M, Khamiss K, Joosen R, Maliepaard C, Sharpe A, Gjetvaj B, Boutilier K. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO)-mediated improvement in cultured embryo quality in vitro entails changes in ascorbate metabolism, meristem development and embryo maturation. Planta 2008, 228(2):255-72. 10.1007/s00425-008-0735-z, 18458948.
56. Hendriks T, Scheer I, Quillet MC, Randoux B, Delbreil B, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. A non symbiotic hemoglobin is expressed during somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1998, 1443:193-197.
57. Smagghe BJ, Blervacq AS, Blassiau C, Decottignies JP, Jacquot JP, Hargrove MS, Hilbert JL. Immunolocalization of non-symbiotic hemoglobins during somatic embryogenesis in chicory. Plant Signaling and Behavior 2007, 2(1):43-49. 2633897, 19516967.
58. Stermer BA, Bianchini GM, Korth KL. Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase activity in plants. Journal of Lipid Research 1994, 35:1133-1140.
59. Berrocal-Lobo M, Segura A, Moreno M, López G, García-Olmedo F, Molina A. Snakin-2, an antimicrobial peptide from potato whose gene is locally induced by wounding and responds to pathogen infection. Plant Physiology 2002, 128(3):951-961. 10.1104/pp.010685, 152207, 11891250.
60. Herzog M, Dorne A-M, Grellet F. GASA, a gibberellin-regulated gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana related to the tomato GAST1 gene. Plant Molecular Biology 1995, 27(4):743-752. 10.1007/BF00020227, 7727751.
61. Bülow L, Schindler M, Hehl R. PathoPlant: a platform for microarray expression data to analyze co-regulated genes involved in plant defence responses. Nucleic Acids Research 2007, (35 Database):D841-D845. 10.1093/nar/gkl835, 1669748, 17099232.
62. Spadoni S, Zabotina O, Di Matteo A, Mikkelsen JD, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G, Mattei B, Bellincampi D. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein interacts with pectin through a binding site formed by four clustered residues of arginine and lysine. Plant Physiology 2006, 141:557-564. 10.1104/pp.106.076950, 1475430, 16648220.
63. Vernoud V, Horton AC, Yang Z, Nielsen E. Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2003, 131:1191-1208. 10.1104/pp.013052, 166880, 12644670.
64. Vitale N, Moss J, Vaughan M. Molecular characterization of the GTPase-activating domain of ADP-ribosylation factor domain protein 1 (ARD1). Journal of Biological Chemistry 1998, 273(5):2553-2560. 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2553, 9446556.
65. Driouich A, Levi S, Staehelin LA, Faye L. Structural and functional organization of the Golgi apparatus in plant cells. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 1994, 32:731-749.
66. Cheong YH, Chang HS, Gupta R, Wang X, Zhu T, Luan S. Transcriptional profiling reveals novel interactions between wounding, pathogen, abiotic stress, and hormonal responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2002, 129:661-677. 10.1104/pp.002857, 161692, 12068110.
67. Leon J, Rojo E, Sanchez-Serrano J. Wound signalling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 2001, 52(354):1-9. 10.1093/jexbot/52.354.1, 11181708.
68. De Paepe A, Vuylsteke M, Van Hummelen P, Zabeau M, Van Der Straeten D. Transcriptional profiling by cDNA-AFLP and microarray analysis reveals novel insights into the early response to ethylene in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 2004, 39:537-559. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02156.x, 15272873.
69. Van Zhong G, Burns JK. Profiling ethylene-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana by microarray analysis. Plant Molecular Biology 2003, 53:117-131. 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009270.81977.ef, 14756311.
70. Weyman PD, Pan Z, Feng Q, Gilchrist DG, Bostock RM. A circadian rhythm-regulated tomato gene is induced by arachidonic acid and Phythophthora infestans infection. Plant Physiology 2006, 140:235-248. 10.1104/pp.105.068874, 1326047, 16361525.
71. Seki M, Ishida J, Narusaka M, Fujita M, Nanjo T, Umezawa T, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K. Monitoring the expression pattern of around 7,000 Arabidopsis genes under ABA treatments using a full-length cDNA microarray. Functional and Integrative Genomics 2002, 2:282-291. 10.1007/s10142-002-0070-6, 12444421.
72. Vinod MS, Sharma N, Manjunatha K, Kanbar A, Praksah NB, Shashidhari HE. Candidate genes for drought tolerance and improved productivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Biosciences 2006, 31(1):69-74. 10.1007/BF02705237, 16595877.
73. Heller R. Recherches sur la nutrition minérale des tissues végétaux cultivés in vitro. Annales des sciences naturelles - Botanique et Biologie Végétale 1953, 14:1-223.
74. Yariv J, Rapport MM, Graf L. The interaction of glycosides and saccharides with antibody to the corresponding phenylazo dyes. Biochemical Journal 1962, 85:383-388. 1243744, 14002491.
75. Compositae Genome Project Database. , http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu/
76. Hot D, Antoine R, Renauld-Mongénie G, Caro V, Hennuy B, Levillain E, Huot L, Wittmann G, Poncet D, Jacob-Dubuisson F, Guyard C, Rimlinger F, Aujame L, Godfroid E, Guiso N, Quentin-Millet MJ, Lemoine Y, Locht C. Differential modulation of Bordetella pertussis virulence genes as evidenced by DNA microarray analysis. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 2003, 269(4):475-86. 10.1007/s00438-003-0851-1, 12768411.
77. The R Project for Statistical Computing. , http://cran.r-project.org/
78. Lemoine S, Combes F, Servant N, Le Crom S. Goulphar: rapid access and expertise for standard two-color microarray normalization methods. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:467-471. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-467, 1626094, 17059595.
79. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 2001, 98(9):5116-5121.
80. Venn Diagram Generator. , http://www.pangloss.com/seidel/Protocols/venn.cgi
81. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 1998, 95:14863-14868.
82. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo
83. Livak KJ, Schittegen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262, 11846609.