Perspectives, frame rates and resolutions: It's all in the game

FDG 2009 - 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 42-49

  Claypool, Mark ^a   Claypool, Kajal ^b  

^a Life Science and Bioengineering Center   (United States)

^b MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROAD SPECTRUM; COMPUTER GAME; FIRST PERSON SHOOTER; FRAME RATE; GAME PLAYERS; MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS; OBJECT SIZE; PLAYABILITY; SYSTEM DESIGNERS; USER ACTION; USER PERFORMANCE; USER STUDY;

CAMERAS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

COMPUTER HARDWARE;

EID: 77953602183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1536513.1536530     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. R. T. Apteker, J. A. Fisher, V. S. Kisimov, and H. Neishlos. Video Acceptability and Frame Rate. IEEE Multimedia, pages 32-40, Fall 1995.
2. S. Bryson. Effects of Lag and Frame Rate on Various Tracking Tasks. In Proceedings of SPIE Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, volume 1915, Sept. 1993.
3. K. Claypool and M. Claypool. On Frame Rate and Player Performance in First Person Shooter Games. ACM/Springer Multimedia Systems Journal (MMSJ), 2007.
4. K. Claypool and M. Claypool. The Effects of Resolution on Users Playing First Person Shooter Games. In Proceedings ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN) Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Jan. 2007.
5. M. Claypool, K. Claypool, and F. Damaa. The Effects of Frame Rate and Resolution on Users Playing First Person Shooter Games. In Proceedings ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN) Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Jan. 2006.
6. H. Yang and G.M. Olson. Exploring Collaborative Navigation: The Effect of Perspectives on Group Performance. In Fourth International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, Sep 2002.
7. B. Johnson and J. Caird. The Effect of Frame Rate and Video Information Redundancy on the Perceptual Learning Of American Sign Language Gestures. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 1996.
8. M. Reddy. The Effects of Low Frame Rate on a Measure for User Performance in Virtual Environments. Technical report, University of Edinburgh, Jan 1997.
9. M. Schuemie. Effect of an External Viewpoint on Therapist Performance in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 834-835, April 2002.
10. M. A. Masry and S. S. Hemami. An Analysis of Subjective Quality in Low Bit Rate Video. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Thessaloniki, Greece, Oct. 2001.
11. M. J. Massimino and T. B. Sheridan. Teleoperator Performance with Varying Force and Visual Feedback. Human Factors, pages 145-157, Mar. 1994.
12. J. McCarthy, M. A. Sasse, and D. Miras. Sharp or Smooth? Comparing the Effects of Quantization versus Frame Rate for Streamed Video. In Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 2004.
13. N.F. Polys and S. Kim and D.A. Bowman. Effects of Information Layout, Screen Size, and Field of View on User Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Environments. In ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 46-55, Nov. 2005. (Pubitemid 44393886)
14. T. Ni, D. Bowman, and J. Chen. Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Graphics Interfaces, Quebec, Canada, June 2006.
15. M. Reddy. The Effects of Low Frame Rate on a Measure for User Performance in Virtual Environments. Technical Report ECS-CSG-36-97, Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, 1997.
16. P. Richard, G. Birebent, P. Coiffet, G. Burdea, D. Gomez, and N. Langrana. Effect of Frame Rate and Force Feedback on Virtual Object Manipulation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(1):95-108, 1996.
17. R. Rouse. What's Your Perspective? ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 33(3):9-12, 1999.
18. G. Smets and K. Overbeeke. Trade-off Between Resolution and Interactivity in Spatial Task Performance. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Sept. 1995.
19. M. Swartz and D. Wallace. Effects of Frame Rate and Resolution Reduction on Human Performance. In Proceedings of IS&T's 46th Annual Conference, Munich, Germany, 1993.
20. A. Tripathi and M. Claypool. Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling. In Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Computing and Networking (IMMCN), Durham, NC, USA, Mar. 2002.
21. M. Troy, A. Kirkpatrick, M. Atkins, and T. Moller. Visualization Task Performance with 2D, 3D and Combination Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(1):2-13, Jan 2006.
22. C. J. van den Branden Lambrecht and O. Verscheure. Perceptual Quality Measure using a Spatio-Temporal Model of the Human Visual System. In Proceedings of SPIE, pages 450-461, San Jose, CA, Jan 1996.
23. B. Watson, V. Spaulding, N. Walker, and W. Ribarsky. Evaluation of the Effects of Frame Time Variation on VR Task Performance. In IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pages 38-44, mar 1997.
24. A. A. Webster, C. T. Jones, M. H. Pinson, S. D. Voran, and S. Wolf. An Objective Video Quality Assessment System Based on Human Perception. In Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, San Jose, CA, USA, Feb. 1993.
25. M. Zink, O. Kunzel, J. Schmitt, and R. Steinmetz. Subjective Impression of Variations in Layer Encoded Videos. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS), Monterey, CA, June 2003.