Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information-rich virtual environments

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 46-55

  Polys, Nicholas F ^a   Kim, Seonho ^a   Bowman, Doug A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D Interaction; Information Rich Virtual Environments; Usability Testing and Evaluation; Visual Design

Indexed keywords

3D INTERACTION; INFORMATION-RICH VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; USABILITY TESTING AND EVALUATION; VISUAL DESIGN;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS; PROJECTION SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 33748687454     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Barrilleaux, J., 3D User Interfaces with Java 3D. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Co (2001).
2. Bell, B., Feiner, S., and Hollerer, T., View Management for Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proc. VIST, ACM Press (2001), 101-110.
3. Bolter, J., Hodges, L.F., Meyer, T., & Nichols, A., Integrating Perceptual and Symbolic Information in VR. Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(4), IEEE (1995), 8-11.
4. Bowman, D.A. & Hodges, L.F., An Evaluation of Techniques for Grabbing and Manipulating Remote Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments. In Proc. Interactive 3D Graphics, ACM Press (1997), 35-38.
5. Bowman, D., North, C., Chen, J., Polys, N., Pyla, P., and Yilmaz, U., Information-Rich Virtual Environments: Theory, Tools, and Research Agenda. In Proc. VRST, Osaka, Japan, ACM Press (2003), 81-90.
6. Brutzman, D., Teaching 3D modeling and simulation: virtual kelp forest case study. Proc. Web3D, Tempe, AZ, ACM Press (2002), 93-101.
7. Card, S., J. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman, Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann (1999).
8. Chandler, P., and Sweller, J., Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8, (1991) 293-332.
9. Chen, J., Pyla P., and Bowman D., Testbed Evaluation of Navigation and Text Display Techniques in an Information-Rich Virtual Environment. In Proc. Virtual Reality, Chicago, IL, IEEE (2004), 181-188.
10. Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G., and Starkweather, G., Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In Proc. INTERACT, (2003), 9-16.
11. Draper, M.H., Viirre, E.S., Furness, T.A. & Gawron, V.J., Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43(1), (2001), 129-146.
12. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., Manual for Kit of Factor Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service (1976).
13. Faraday, P., and Sutcliffe, Alistair, Designing Effective Multimedia Presentations. In Proc. CHI, Atlanta, GA, ACM Press (1997), 272-278.
14. Faraday, P., and Sutcliffe, Alistair, Making Contact Points between Text and Images. Multimedia, Bristol, UK, ACM Press (1998), 29-37.
15. Feiner, S., Macintyre, B., Haupt, M., and Solomon, E., Windows on the World: 2D Windows for 3D Augmented Reality. In Proc. UIST, ACM Press (1993), 145-155.
16. Furnas, G., W., Generalized Fisheye Views: Visualizing Complex Information Spaces. In Proc. CHI, ACM Press (1986), 16-23.
17. Goldstein, E.B., Sensation and Perception (5th Edition). Brooks/Cole Publishing (1999).
18. Gutwin, C. and Skopik, A., Fisheye Views are Good for Large Steering Tasks. CHI 5(1) (2003), 201-208.
19. Mackinlay, J., and Heer, J., Wideband Displays: Mitigating Multiple Monitor Seams. In Proc. CHI, Vienna, Austria, ACM Press (2004), 1521-1524.
20. McClean, P., Saini-Eidukat, Bernie, Schwert, Donald. Slator, Brian, and White, Alan, Virtual Worlds in Large Enrollment Biology and Geology Classes Significantly Improve Authentic Learning. In Proc 12th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (ICCTL-01). J. A. Chambers. Jacksonville, FL, Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning (2001), 111-118.
21. Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa Henry S., and Wright, M., Development of Chemical Markup Language (CML) as a System for Handling Complex Chemical Content. New Journal of Chemistry, (2001), 618-634.
22. North Dakota State University World Wide Web Instructional Committee (NDSU WWWIC), (2004) http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/mcclean/wwwic
23. Polys, N. F., Stylesheet Transformations for Interactive Visualization: Towards Web3D Chemistry Curricula. In Proc. WebSD, St. Malo, France, ACM Press (2003), 85-90.
24. Polys, N., Bowman, D., North, C., Laubenbacher, R., Duca, K., PathSim Visualizer: An Information-Rich Virtual Environment for Systems Biology. In Proc. Web3D, Monterey, CA, ACM Press (2004), 7-14.
25. Polys, N., F., and Bowman, Doug A., Desktop Information-Rich Virtual Environments: Challenges and Techniques. Virtual Reality 8(1), (2004), 41-54.
26. Poupyrev, I., Weghorst, S., Billinghurst, M., & Ichikawa, T., The Go-Go Interaction Techniques: Non-linear Mapping for Direct Manipulation in VR. In Proc. UIST, ACM Press (1996), 79-80.
27. Swaminathan, K., Sato, S., Interaction Design for Large Displays. ACM Interactions; January, ACM Press (1997).
28. Tan, Desney, Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., and Pausch, R., With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Performance. CHI 5(1), (2003), 217-224.
29. Wei, B.,Silva, C., Koutsofios, E., Krishnan, S., and North, S., Visualization Research with Large Displays. Computer Graphics and Applications 20(4), IEEE (2000), 50-54.