-
1
-
-
49449097222
-
Cardiac transplantation in infants
-
J.M. Drazen, "Cardiac Transplantation in Infants," New England Journal of Medicine 359 (2008): 749-750
-
(2008)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.359
, pp. 749-750
-
-
Drazen, J.M.1
-
2
-
-
49449100639
-
Pediatric heart transplantation after declaration of cardiocirculatory death
-
M.M. Boucek et al., "Pediatric Heart Transplantation after Declaration of Cardiocirculatory Death," New England Journal of Medicine 359 (2008): 709-714.
-
(2008)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.359
, pp. 709-714
-
-
Boucek, M.M.1
-
3
-
-
33644930249
-
Report of a national conference on donation after cardiac death
-
J. Bernat et al., "Report of a National Conference on Donation after Cardiac Death," American Journal of Transplantation 6 (2006): 281-291
-
(2006)
American Journal of Transplantation
, vol.6
, pp. 281-291
-
-
Bernat, J.1
-
4
-
-
49449103301
-
The boundaries of organ donation after circulatory death
-
Jim Bernat pointed out this to me in conversation. See his, and the discussion in Curfman, Morissey, and Drazen, "Cardiac Transplantation in Infants."
-
Jim Bernat pointed out this to me in conversation. See his "The Boundaries of Organ Donation after Circulatory Death," in New England Journal of Medicine 359 (2008): 669-671, and the discussion in Curfman, Morissey, and Drazen, "Cardiac Transplantation in Infants."
-
(2008)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.359
, pp. 669-671
-
-
-
5
-
-
77953568930
-
-
There are reasons for skepticism concerning both the dead donor rule and this definition of death. However, I shall take both for granted in the main analysis of this essay
-
There are reasons for skepticism concerning both the dead donor rule and this definition of death. However, I shall take both for granted in the main analysis of this essay.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
49449107323
-
Donating hearts after cardiac death - Reversing the irreversible
-
R.M. Veatch, "Donating Hearts after Cardiac Death - Reversing the Irreversible," New England Journal of Medicine 359 (2008): 672-673
-
(2008)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.359
, pp. 672-673
-
-
Veatch, R.M.1
-
7
-
-
0033217135
-
The dead donor rule
-
J. Robertson, "The Dead Donor Rule," Hastings Center Report 29, no.6 (1999): 12.
-
(1999)
Hastings Center Report
, vol.29
, Issue.6
, pp. 12
-
-
Robertson, J.1
-
9
-
-
0032016885
-
A defense of the whole-brain concept of death
-
and J. Bernat, "A Defense of the Whole-Brain Concept of Death," Hastings Center Report 28, no.2 (1998): 18.
-
(1998)
Hastings Center Report
, vol.28
, Issue.2
, pp. 18
-
-
Bernat, J.1
-
10
-
-
33747277693
-
Are organ donors after cardiac death really dead?
-
Bernat no longer holds this view. See his
-
Bernat no longer holds this view. See his "Are Organ Donors After Cardiac Death Really Dead?" Journal of Clinical Ethics 17 (2006): 122-132
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Ethics
, vol.17
, pp. 122-132
-
-
-
11
-
-
0035086978
-
The death watch: Certifying death using cardiac criteria
-
Others have indicated that in DCD cases, permanence is what counts in declaring death
-
Others have indicated that in DCD cases, permanence is what counts in declaring death. See M.A. DeVita, "The Death Watch: Certifying Death Using Cardiac Criteria," Progress in Transplantation 11 (2001): 59
-
(2001)
Progress in Transplantation
, vol.11
, pp. 59
-
-
Devita, M.A.1
-
13
-
-
0033217249
-
When is 'dead'?
-
S.J. Youngner, R.M. Arnold, and M.A. DeVita, "When Is 'Dead'?" Hastings Center Report 29, no.6 (1999): 16
-
(1999)
Hastings Center Report
, vol.29
, Issue.6
, pp. 16
-
-
Youngner, S.J.1
Arnold, R.M.2
Devita, M.A.3
-
14
-
-
0027621347
-
The irreversibility of death: Reply to cole
-
quoting with approval T. Tomlinson, "The Irreversibility of Death: Reply to Cole," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (1993): 157.
-
(1993)
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
, vol.3
, pp. 157
-
-
Tomlinson, T.1
-
16
-
-
77953580215
-
-
Obviously, what counts as circumstances that could obtain" needs analysis. That difficult analysis would take us too far afield because the subject of this essay is not the nature of dispositional properties
-
Obviously, what counts as "circumstances that could obtain" needs analysis. That difficult analysis would take us too far afield because the subject of this essay is not the nature of dispositional properties.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
23744440096
-
The death of whole-brain death: The plague of the disaggregators, somaticists, and mentalists
-
and elsewhere
-
R.M. Veatch, "The Death of Whole-Brain Death: The Plague of the Disaggregators, Somaticists, and Mentalists," Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2005): 353-378 and elsewhere.
-
(2005)
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
, vol.30
, pp. 353-378
-
-
Veatch, R.M.1
-
19
-
-
77953603735
-
-
Note
-
This is too simple, but the complications are unnecessary here. I believe that a case can be made for the view that we have obligations to those who do not exist now but will exist at a later time, and for the view that we have obligations to those who do not exist now but have existed in the past. These obligations are transtemporal obligations. These special cases concern obligations of existing beings (at one time) to existing beings (at another time). Therefore, they are not counterexamples to the above claim.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0032081556
-
Commentary: Clear thinking and open discussion guide IOM's report on organ donation
-
J.T. Potts, Jr., et al., "Commentary: Clear Thinking and Open Discussion Guide IOM's Report on Organ Donation," Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1998): 167
-
(1998)
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
, vol.26
, pp. 167
-
-
Potts Jr., J.T.1
-
21
-
-
0032081553
-
Doubts about death: The silence of the institute of medicine
-
responding to Jerry Menikoff's objections to the DCD protocol in "Doubts About Death: The Silence of the Institute of Medicine," Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1998): 157-165
-
(1998)
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
, vol.26
, pp. 157-165
-
-
-
22
-
-
57849108174
-
Rethinking the ethics of vital organ donations
-
F. Miller and R. Truog, "Rethinking the Ethics of Vital Organ Donations," Hastings Center Report 38, no.6 (2008): 38-46.
-
(2008)
Hastings Center Report
, vol.38
, Issue.6
, pp. 38-46
-
-
Miller, F.1
Truog, R.2
-
25
-
-
0024644342
-
Why abortion is immoral
-
D. Marquis, "Why Abortion Is Immoral," Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202.
-
(1989)
Journal of Philosophy
, vol.86
, pp. 183-202
-
-
Marquis, D.1
-
27
-
-
65249186288
-
-
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, at 161-162
-
and F.J. Beckwith, Defending Life (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2007), at 161-162
-
(2007)
Defending Life
-
-
Beckwith, F.J.1
|