Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide

Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-192

  Solomon, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953572330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (30)

1. Association of Research Libraries (2004) Monograph and Serial Expenditures. www.webcitation.org/5LramQyB8 available at: (accessed: 13 January 2007)
2. W.G. Baxt, J.F. Waeckerle, J. Berlin and M.L. Callahm (1998) Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using fictitious manuscripts to evaluate peer reviewer performance. Annals of Emergency Medicine 32 310-317
3. C.T. Bergstrom (2002) The Economics of Journal Publishing. www.webcitation.org/5Lrapz5I9 available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
4. S. Brown (2007) Nature ends experiment with open peer review, as responses are disappointing. Chronicle of Higher Education 11 http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/01/2007011102n.htm January; available at: (accessed: 17 October 2007)
5. Chicago Manual of Style (2007) Chicago Manual of Style Online. www.webcitation.org/5OGdYwPBH available at: (accessed: 21 April 2007)
6. J. Coffin (2006) Analysis of open source principles in diverse collaborative communities. First Monday 11(6), www.webcitation.org/5LrbeGIM9 available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
7. R. Crow (2006) Publishing cooperatives: an alternative for non-profit publishers. First Monday 11(9), www.webcitation.org/5M2HBRqqz available at, (accessed: 20 January 2007)
8. P.C. Gøtzsche (1989) Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blinded trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Controlled Clinical Trials 10 31-56
9. J. Guédon (2001) In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientificpublishing. paper presented at May meeting ofAssociation of Research Libraries accessed: 13 January 2007 www.webcitation.org/5LraxWswk available at
10. S. Harnad (2003) Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 49(4), 337-342. www.webcitation.org/5Lrb1iFYD available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
11. ICMJE (2007) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. www.webcitation.org/5OAZfA0Yk available at, (accessed: 17 April 2007)
12. ISSN International Centre (2007) What is an ISSN? www.webcitation.org/5Pghuxy0h available at, (accessed: 18 June 2007)
13. T. Jefferson (2006) Quality and value: models of quality control for scientific research. Nature www.webcitation.org/5MZhMcDUs available at, (accessed: 11 February 2007)
14. Kaufman-Will Group (2005) The Facts About Open Access. www.alpsp.org/ngen_public/article.asp?id=200&did=47&aid=270&st=&oaid=-1 available at, (accessed: 7 August 2007)
15. D.A. Kronick (1976) A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technical Press 1665–1790. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press
16. K.K. Kumashiro (2005) Thinking collaboratively about the peer-review process for journal-article publication. Harvard Educational Review 75(3), 257-287
17. A.J. Meadows (1980) Development of Science Publishing in Europe. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers
18. OpCit Project (2006) The effect of open access and downloads (“hits”) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. www.webcitation.org/5LrbGytZr available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
19. E. Parang and L. Saunders (1994) SPEC Kit 202 electronic journals in ARL libraries: issues and trends. ARL Systems and Procedures Exchange Center Flyer 202 www.webcitation.org/5LrbLKI6Y available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
20. S.J. Pocock, M.D. Hughes and R.J. Lee (1987) Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. New England Journal of Medicine 317 426-432
21. M. Roiq (2007) Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing. www.webcitation.org/5OC2BmoxS available at, (accessed: 18 April 2007)
22. A.C. Schafner (1994) The future of scientific journals: lessons from the past. Information Technology and Libraries 13 239-247
23. J. Slaughter (2007) Constitutions and Bylaws. www.webcitation.org/5QupbWGaW available at, (accessed: 7 August 2007)
24. D.J. Solomon (2007) The role of peer review for scholarly journals in the information age. Journal of Electronic Publishing 10(1), http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0010.107 available at, (accessed: 7 August 2007)
25. K. Stranack (2006) Getting found, staying found, increasing impact. Enhancing readership and preserving content for OJS journals. Public Knowledge Project www.webcitation.org/5P6Vd3kVN available at, (accessed: 25 May 2007)
26. D.B. Tesdahl (2005) The Nonprofit Board’s Guide to Bylaws (excerpts). www.webcitation.org/5QurDFW74 available at, (accessed: 7 August 2007)
27. L. Van Orsdel and K. Born (2002) Periodicals price survey 2002: doing the digital flip. Library Journal 15 www.webcitation.org/5LrbS6aLk April; available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)
28. N. Walsh (2007) A technical introduction to XML. www.webcitation.org/5QujMB6tE available at, (accessed: 6 August 2007)
29. J. Willinsky (2006) The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship Cambridge, MA: MIT Press www.webcitation.org/5QuoLppQ2 available at, (accessed: 7 August 2007)
30. J. Willinsky and L. Wolfson (2001) The indexing of scholarly journals: a tipping point for publishing reform? Journal of Electronic Publishing 7(2), www.webcitation.org/5LrbVQfcH available at, (accessed: 13 January 2007)