메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

The role of peer review for scholarly journals in the information age

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 34250665124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10802711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0010.107     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (47)

References (23)
  • 1
    • 0037024223 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do?
    • Altman, D. G. 2002 Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? JAMA 287;21:2765-2767.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , Issue.21 , pp. 2765-2767
    • Altman, D.G.1
  • 2
    • 0031709291 scopus 로고
    • Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance
    • Baxt, W. G., J. F. Waeckerle, J. Berlin, and M. L. Callahm. 1989. Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance. Annals of Emergency Medicine 32:310-317.
    • (1989) Annals of Emergency Medicine , vol.32 , pp. 310-317
    • Baxt, W.G.1    Waeckerle, J.F.2    Berlin, J.3    Callahm, M.L.4
  • 3
    • 34248326549 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systems: Online frontiers of the peer-reviewed literature
    • Bloom, T. 2006. Systems: Online frontiers of the peer-reviewed literature. In Nature. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/ index.html.
    • (2006) Nature
    • Bloom, T.1
  • 5
    • 34250633460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Online journals challenge scientific peer review. Retrieved on November 19, 2006 from
    • Chang, A. 2006. Online journals challenge scientific peer review. Retrieved on November 19, 2006 from http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/ news/breaking_news/15655422.htm.
    • (2006)
    • Chang, A.1
  • 6
    • 34250637413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Review
    • Debate
    • Debate. 2006. "Peer Review" In Nature. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerrevie w/debate/index.html
    • (2006) Nature
  • 7
    • 23344445666 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revolutionized peer review?
    • Editorial. 2005. "Revolutionized peer review?". Nature Neuroscience 8; 4:397.
    • (2005) Nature Neuroscience , vol.8 , Issue.4 , pp. 397
    • Editorial1
  • 9
    • 0037024254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making reviewers visible. Openness, accountability and credit
    • Godlee, F. 2002. Making reviewers visible. Openness, accountability and credit. JAMA287; 21:2762-2765.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , Issue.21 , pp. 2762-2765
    • Godlee, F.1
  • 10
    • 0033514041 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence on peer review: Scientific quality control or smokescreen?
    • 2 January
    • Goldbeck-Wood, S. 1999. Evidence on peer review: scientific quality control or smokescreen? BMJ 318:44-45 (2 January). http://www.bmj.com/ cgi/reprint/318/7175/44.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 44-45
    • Goldbeck-Wood, S.1
  • 11
    • 0024550344 scopus 로고
    • Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blinded trials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
    • Gotzxche, P. C. 1989. Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blinded trials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10:3159.
    • (1989) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.10 , pp. 3159
    • Gotzxche, P.C.1
  • 12
    • 0013242073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Oldenburg's long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing
    • ARL, at
    • Guédon, J. 2001. In Oldenburg's long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Presentation to the May 2001 meeting of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL), at http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/138/guedon.html.
    • (2001) Presentation to the May 2001 meeting of the Association of Research Libraries
    • Guédon, J.1
  • 13
    • 0037024214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of editorial peer review
    • June 5
    • Jefferson, T., P. Alderson, E. Wager, and F. Davidoff. 2002a. Effects of editorial peer review. JAMA June 5, 287; 21:2784-2786.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , Issue.21 , pp. 2784-2786
    • Jefferson, T.1    Alderson, P.2    Wager, E.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 14
    • 0037024264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring quality of editorial peer review
    • June 5
    • Jefferson, T, E. Wager, and F. Davidoff. 2002b. Measuring quality of editorial peer review. JAMA June 5, 287; 21:2786-2790.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , Issue.21 , pp. 2786-2790
    • Jefferson, T.1    Wager, E.2    Davidoff, F.3
  • 15
    • 84861507368 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality and value: Models of quality control for scientific research
    • Jefferson, T. 2006. Quality and value: Models of quality control for scientific research. In Nature. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/ debate/nature05031.html.
    • (2006) Nature
    • Jefferson, T.1
  • 16
    • 73949102442 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An open, two-stage peer-review journal
    • Koop T., and U. Pöschl. 2006. An open, two-stage peer-review journal. In Nature. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/ nature04988.html.
    • (2006) Nature
    • Koop, T.1    Pöschl, U.2
  • 17
    • 27144461700 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication
    • Kumashiro, K. K. 2005. Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication. Harvard Educational Review 75; 3:257-287.
    • (2005) Harvard Educational Review , vol.75 , Issue.3 , pp. 257-287
    • Kumashiro, K.K.1
  • 18
    • 0023216759 scopus 로고
    • Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals
    • Pocock, S. J., M. D. Hughes, and R. J. Lee. 1987. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. New England Journal of Medicine 317:426-432.
    • (1987) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.317 , pp. 426-432
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Hughes, M.D.2    Lee, R.J.3
  • 19
    • 33747698399 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer
    • Regehr, G., and G. Bordage. 2006. To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer. Medical Education 40:832-839.
    • (2006) Medical Education , vol.40 , pp. 832-839
    • Regehr, G.1    Bordage, G.2
  • 20
    • 21844503484 scopus 로고
    • The future of scientific journals: Lessons from the past
    • Schafner, A. C. 1994. The future of scientific journals: Lessons from the past. Information Technology and Libraries 13:239-47.
    • (1994) Information Technology and Libraries , vol.13 , pp. 239-247
    • Schafner, A.C.1
  • 21
    • 34250631840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A hybrid system of peer review
    • Sandewall, E. 2006. A hybrid system of peer review. In Nature. http://www.nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04994.html.
    • (2006) Nature
    • Sandewall, E.1
  • 22
    • 0033514074 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening up BMJ peer review
    • 2 January
    • Smith, R. 1999 Opening up BMJ peer review. BMJ 1318:4-5 (2 January). http://www.bmj.eom/cgi/content/full/318/7175/4.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.1318 , pp. 4-5
    • Smith, R.1
  • 23
    • 0033514073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: A randomized trial
    • 2 January
    • Van Rooyen S., F. Godlee, S. Evans, N. Black, and R. Smith. 1999. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomized trial. BMJ 318:23-27 (2 January). http://www.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/318/ 7175/23.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 23-27
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3    Black, N.4    Smith, R.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.