Estimating the bioenergy potential of pinus radiata plantations in Chile;Estimación del potencial bioenergético de las plantaciones de pinus radiata, en Chile

Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 93-102

  Acuña, Eduardo ^a   Espinosa, Miguel ^a   Cancino, Jorge ^a   Rubilar, Rafael ^a   Muñoz, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Bioethanol; Biomass; Logging residues; Monte carlo simulation; Radiata pine

Indexed keywords

PINUS RADIATA; RADIATA;

EID: 77953563407     PISSN: 03045609     EISSN: 07181620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-16202010000100009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acuña, E. 2001. Evaluación del rendimiento económico de regímenes silviculturales de pino radiata, basado en análisis de riesgo. Tesis de Magíster en Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile. 81 pp.
2. Baldini, J. 1994. Análisis del crecimiento de un rodal adulto de Pinus radiata D. Don. Memoria de Título, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile. 93 pp.
3. Berrocal, A. 2003. Cuantificación y caracterización química de material lignocelulósico de Pinus radiata D.Don en la VIII Región, para la producción de bioetanol. Tesis de Magíster en Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile. 91 pp.
4. Chaturvedia, P. 2004. Biomass-The fuel of the rural poor in developing countries. Pages 161-181 In: Sims, R. (ed.). Bioenergy Options for a Cleaner Environment: in Developed and Developing Countries. Elsevier Science. amsterdam, the Netherlands. 198 pp.
5. CEC. 2001. Costs and benefits of a biomass-to-ethanol production industry in California. California Energy Commission (CEC). Report. P500-01-002. Sacramento, California, USA. 197 pp.
6. CNE. 2009. Generación bruta SIC-SIng. Comisión Nacional de Energía (CNE). Available online at: www.cne.cl/cnewww/export/sites/default/06_Estadisticas/Documentos/genera cion_bruta_sic_sing.xls (Website accessed: October, 2009).
7. Cook, J., and J. Beyea. 2000. Bioenergy in the United States: Progress and possibilities. Biomass and Bioenergy 18:441-455.
8. Cullen, a.C., and H.C. Frey. 1999. Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment. Plenum Press, NY, USA. 352 pp.
9. Diario Oficial. 2008a. Ley no 20.257. Diario Oficial de la República de Chile. 01 de abril de 2008. Santiago, Chile.
10. Diario Oficial. 2008b. Decreto Supremo no 11. 2008. Diario Oficial de la república de Chile. 09 de mayo de 2008. Santiago, Chile.
11. EIA. 2001. Annual energy outlook 2001: With projections to 2020. Energy Information administration (EIA), US Department of Energy. Washington DC, USA. 262 pp.
12. Espinosa, M., E. Acuña, J. Cancino, F. Muñoz and D. Perry. 2005. Carbon sink potential of radiata pine plantations in Chile. Forestry 78:11-19.
13. Gan, J. and C.T. Smith. 2006. Availability of logging residues and potential for electricity production and carbon displacement in the USA. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:1011-1020.
14. Giampietro, M., S. Ulgiati, and D. Pimentel. 1997. Feasibility of largescale biofuel production. Bioscience 47:587-600.
15. Gottfried, B.S. 1984. Elements of Stochastic Process Simulation. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA. 304 pp.
16. Graf, A. and T. Koehler. 2000. Oregon cellulose-ethanol study. An evaluation of the potential for ethanol production in Oregon using cellulose-based feedstocks. Report prepared by the Oregon Office of Energy. Portland, Oregon, USA. 30 pp.
17. Hall, D.O. 1997. Biomass energy in industrialized countries. A view of the future. Forest Ecology and Management 91:17-45.
18. Hamelinck, C.N., G. van Hooijdonk, and A.P. Faaij. 2005. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Techno-economic performance in short, middle, and long term. Biomass and Bioenergy 28:384-410.
19. Heath, L.S., and J.E. Smith. 2000. An assessment of uncertainty in forest carbon budget projections. Environmental Science and Policy 3:73-82.
20. INFOR. 2007. Estadísticas forestales chilenas 2006. Boletín Estadístico 117. Instituto Forestal (INFOR), Ministerio de agricultura. Santiago, Chile. 163 pp.
21. Jun, E., W. Kim, and S.H. Chang. 2009. The analysis of security cost for different energy sources. Applied Energy 86:1894-1901.
22. Morgan, M.g., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A guide to the treatment of uncertainty in quantitative policy and risk analysis. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA. 344 pp.
23. th Edition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Technical Report NREL/TP-620-39728. golden, Colorado, USA. 231 pp.
24. NREL. 2009. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_yield_calculator.html (Accessed: March, 2009).
25. ODEPA. 2007. Informe Final (versión Preliminar): Comité Público-Privado de Bioenergía. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas agrarias (ODEPa), Ministerio de Agricultura, Departamento de Políticas Agrarias, Unidad de Bioenergía. Available online at: www.bcn.cl/carpeta_temas/temas_portada.2007-01-26.2084740943/otros-docum entos/Comite_Bioenergia-Informe_Final.pdf (Website accessed: March, 2009).
26. Perlack, R.D., L.L. Wright, A.F. Turhollow, and R.L. Graham. 2005. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Rept. DOE/gO102005-2135. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Oak ridge, tennessee, USa. 78 pp.
27. Rasinmäki, J., and T. Melkas. 2005. A method for estimating tree composition and volume using harvester data. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20:85-95.
28. Ruminot, J. 2009. Modelo Recuperación de Residuos de Cosecha Forestal de Pinus radiata D. Don, y su Potencial Energético. Memoria de título, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile. 134 pp.
29. Santana, J. 1998. Análisis del crecimiento de un rodal de Pinus radiata D. Don de 42 años de edad. Memoria de Título, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile. 36 pp.
30. Sedjo, R.A. 1999. The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. New Forests 17:339-360.
31. Seiffert, M., M. Kaltschmitt, and J.a. Miranda. 2009. The biomethane potential in Chile. Biomass and Bioenergy 33:564-572.
32. Smith, J.E. and L.S. Heath. 2000. Considerations for interpreting probabilistic estimates of uncertainty of forest carbon. Pages 102-111. In: L.A. Joyce, and R. Birdsey (eds.). The impact of climate change on america's Forests. USDA Forest Service, general technical report rMrS-gtr-59.
33. Smith, J.E. and L.S. Heath. 2001. Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model. Environmental Management 27:253-267.
34. Smeets, E.M.W., A.P.C. Faaij, I.M. Lewandowski, and W.C. Turkenburg. 2007. A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 33:56-106.
35. Solomon, B.D., J.R. Barnes, and K.E. Halvorsen. 2007. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economies, and energy policy. Biomass and Bioenergy 31:416-425.
36. Toro, J., and S. Gessel. 1999. Radiata pine plantations in Chile. New Forests 18:33-44.
37. USDE. 2006. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda. United State Department. of Energy (USDE). report DOE/SC-0095. Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and renewable Energy. Rockville, Maryland, USa. 206 pp.
38. Vose, D. 1996. Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modeling. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester, England. 340 pp.