The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs: Recent performance, future potentials, and environmental implications

New Forests

Volumn 17, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 339-359

  Sedjo, Roger A ^a  

^a Forest Economics and Policy Program DC   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand; Financial returns; Production; Pulp wood; Supply

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; FUTURE PROSPECT; PLANTATION FORESTRY; YIELD;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032809171     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006563420947     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson, R.S. and Huber, W. 1988. The Hour of the Fox: Tropical Forests, the World Bank and Indigenous People in Central India. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
2. Bazett, M. 1993. Industrial Wood. Shell/WWF Tree Plantation Review Study No. 3. WWF (United Kingdom), Panda House, Weyside Park, Godalming, Surrey.
3. Clapp, R.A.F. 1993. The forest at the end of the world: The transition form old-growth to plantation forestry in Chile. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography. University of California, Berkeley, CA.
4. FAO Yearbook of Forest Products. 1982-93. Food and Agricultural Organizations of the United Nations, Rome, 1994.
5. Leslie, A.J. 1977. Where contradictory theory and practice co-exist. Unasylva 29 115: 2-17.
6. Lugo, A.E., Parrotta, J. A. and Brown, S. 1993. Loss in species caused by tropical deforestation and their recovery through management. Ambio 22: 106-109.
7. MacLaren, J.P. 1993. Radiata Pine Growers' Manual. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 184. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand.
8. Mather, A. 1990. Global Forest Resources. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
9. Moulton, R.J., Mangold, R.D. and Snellgrove, J.D. 1993. Tree Planting in the United States 1992. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
10. NAFI (National Association of Forest Industries) News. 1995. NAFI, Canberra.
11. Pandey, D. 1992. Assessment of tropical forest plantation resources. Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Unpublished report to Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
12. Persily, M.M. 1994. Aracruz Celulose S. A.: A Brazilian kraft pulp company confronts sustainable development. Senior thesis, Center for Comparative Study of Development, Department of Portuguese and Brazilian Studies. Brown University.
13. Sedjo, R.A. 1983. The Comparative Economics of Plantation Forestry: A Global Assessment. Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore, MD.
14. Sedjo, R.A. 1990. Review of 'The Hour of the Fox." Econ. Dev. Cult. Chang. 39(1): 215-220.
15. Sedjo, R.A. and Lyon, K.S. 1990. The Long-term Adequacy of World Timber Supply. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
16. Sedjo, R.A., Wiseman, A.C., Brooks, D. and Lyon, K.S. 1994. Global forest products trade: The consequences of domestic forest land-use policy. Discussion Paper 94-13. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
17. Suchek, V.I. 1991. The role of the planted forest in the pulp and paper industry of Brazil. For. Chron. 67(6).
18. WRI (World Resource Institute, Washington D.C.) 1986. World Resources 1986. Basic Books, New York.