Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method

Gait and Posture

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-5

  Twomey, D ^a   McIntosh, A S ^a   Simon, J ^b   Lowe, K ^c   Wolf, S I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c SYDNEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Children; Foot kinematics; Low arched feet

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HEIDELBERG FOOT MEASUREMENT METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCHOOL CHILD; WALKING; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOT MALFORMATION; HALLUX; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SUBTALAR JOINT; VIDEORECORDING;

BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT DEFORMITIES, CONGENITAL; GAIT; HALLUX; HUMANS; MALE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SUBTALAR JOINT; SUPINATION; VIDEO RECORDING; WALKING; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 77953540955     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wolf S., Simon J., Patikas D., Schuster W., Armbrust P., Doderlein L. Foot motion in children shoes-a comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes. Gait & Posture 2007, 27:51-59.
2. Nester C.J., Jones R.K., Liu A., Howard D., Lundberg A., Arndt A., et al. Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:3412-3423.
3. Leardini A., Benedetti M., Berti L., Bettinelli D., Nativo R., Giannini S. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait & Posture 2007, 25:453-462.
4. Tulchin K., Karol L. Multi-segment foot motion in healthy individuals: comparisons of children and adults. Gait & Posture 2006, 24S:S219-S220.
5. Stebbins J., Harrington M., Thompson N., Zavatsky A., Theologis T. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. Gait & Posture 2006, 23:401-410.
6. Simon J., Doederlein L., McIntosh A., Metaxiotis D., Bock H., Wolf S. The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. Gait & Posture 2006, 23:411-424.
7. Baker R., Robb J. Foot models for clinical gait analysis. Gait & Posture 2006, 23:399-400.
8. MacWilliams B.A., Cowley M., Nicholson D. Foot kinematics and kinetic during adolescent gait. Gait & Posture 2003, 17:214-224.
9. Gilmour J.C., Burns Y. The measurement of the medial longitudinal arch in children. Foot & Ankle International 2001, 22:493-4498.
10. Cashmere T., Smith R., Hunt A. Medial longitudinal arch of the foot: stationary versus walking measurements. Foot & Ankle International 1999, 20:112-118.
11. Cavanagh P., Rodgers M. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. Journal of Biomechanics 1987, 20:547-550.
12. Cavanagh P., Morag E., Boulton A., Young M., Deffner K., Pammert S. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 30:243-250.
13. Saltzman C.L. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 1995, 76:45-49.
14. Kanatli U., Yetkin H., Cila E. Footprint and radiographic analysis of the feet. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2001, 21:225-228.
15. Hunt A., Smith R. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clinical Biomechanics 2004, 19:391-397.
16. Ness M., Long J., Marks R., Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait & Posture 2008, 27:331-339.
17. Houck J., Tome J., Nawoczenski D. Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. Gait & Posture 2008, 28:29-37.
18. Ringleb S., Kavros S., Kotajarvi B., Hansen D., Kitaoka H., Kaufman H. Changes in gait associated with acute stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait & Posture 2007, 25:555-564.
19. Tome J., Nawoczenski D., Flemister A., Houck J. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2006, 36:635-644.
20. Donatelli R. The biomechanics of the foot and ankle 1996, F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia.
21. Cornwall M.W., McPoil T.G., Fishco W.D., Hunt L., Lane C., O'Donnell D. The relationship between forefoot alignment and rearfoot motion during walking. Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine 2004, 38:35-40.
22. Takao M., Komatsu F., Oae K., Miyamoto W., Uchio Y., Ochi M., et al. Proximal oblique-domed osteotomy of the first metatarsal for the treatment of hallux valgus associate with flat foot: effect to the correction of the longitudinal arch of the foot. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2007, 127:685-690.
23. Ledoux W.R., Shofer J.B., Smith D.G., Sullivan K., Hayes S.G., Assal M., et al. Relationship between foot type, foot deformity, and ulcer occurrence in the high-risk diabetic foot. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2005, 42:665-672.
24. Ledoux W.R., Hillstrom H.J. The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait & Posture 2002, 15:1-9.
25. Simon J., Metaxiotis D., Siebel A., Bock H., Dorderlein L. A multi-segmented foot model. Gait & Posture 2001, 13:297.
26. Kadaba M., Ramakrishnan H., Wootten M., Gainey J., Gorton G., Cochran G. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. Journal of Orthopedic Research 1989, 7:849-860.
27. Kidder S., Abuzzahab F., Harris G. A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait. IEEE Transaction on Rehabilitation Engineering 1996, 4:25-32.
28. Leardini A., Benedetti M., Catani F., Simoncini L., Giannini S. An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. Clinical Biomechanics 1999, 14:528-536.
29. Hunt A., Smith R., Torode M., Keenan A. Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking. Clinical Biomechanics 2001, 16:592-600.
30. Hwang S., Choi H., Kim Y. Motion analysis based on a multi-segment foot model in normal walking: 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2004, 5104-5106.
31. Mann R. Biomechanics of the foot 1985, The CV Mosby Co., St. Louis. 2nd ed.
32. Carson M., Harrington M., Thompson N., O'Connor J., Theologis T. Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34:1299-1307.