Medial longitudinal arch of the foot: Stationary versus walking measures

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 112-118

  Cashmere, Trisha ^a   Smith, Richard ^b   Hunt, Adrienne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SITTING; STANDING; WALKING;

EID: 0032941395     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110079902000208     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bruckner, J.: Variations in the human subtalar joint. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 8:489-494, 1987.
2. Cavanagh, P.R., and Rodgers, M.M.: Pressure distribution under the human foot. In Perren, S.M., and Schneider, E. (eds.), Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijoff Publishers, 1985, pp. 85-89.
3. Cavanagh, P.R., and Rodgers, M.M.: The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J. Biomech., 20:527-551, 1987.
4. Clarke, H.H.: An objective method of measuring the height of the longitudinal arch in foot examinations. Res. Quarterly, 4:99-107, 1933.
5. Cobey, J.C., and Sella, E.: Standardizing methods of measurement of foot shape by including the effects of subtalar rotation. Foot Ankle, 1:30-36, 1981.
6. Dahle, L.K., Mueller, M., Delitto, A., and Diamond, J.E.: Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to low extremity injury. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 14:70-74, 1991.
7. Franco, A.H.: Pes cavus and pes planus. Phys. Ther., 67:688-694, 1987.
8. Hawes, M.R., Nauchbauer, W., Sovak, D., and Nigg, B.M.: Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle, 13:22-26, 1992.
9. Hennig, E.M., and Cavanagh, P.R.: Ultrasonic quantification of the arch of the weight bearing foot. In Winter, D. A., and Norman, R. (eds.), Biomechanics IX-B. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics Publishers, 1985, pp. 211-216.
10. Hicks, J.H.: The mechanics of the foot II: the plantar aponeurosis and the arch. J. Anat., 88:25-31, 1954.
11. Irwin, L.W.: A study of the tendency of school children to develop flat-footedness. Res. Q., 8:46-53, 1937.
12. Kayano, J., Norimatsu, T., Fujita, M., Matsusaka, N., Yang, S., and Suzuki, R.: Changes of the medial arch of the foot during walking. In Jonsson B. (ed.), Biomechanics X. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics Publishers, 1987, pp. 409-412.
13. Ker, R.F., Bennett, M.B., Bibby, S.R., Kester, R.C., and Alexander, R.McN.: The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature, 325:147-149, 1987.
14. Kernozek, T.W., and Ricard, M.D.: Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 71:988-991, 1990.
15. Kitaoka, H.B., Lundberg, A., Luo, Z.P., and An, K-N.: Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading. Foot Ankle Int., 16:492-499, 1995.
16. Maslen, B., and Ackland, T.: Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. Clin. Biomech., 9:291-296, 1994.
17. Messier, S.P., and Pittala, K.A.: Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Med. Sci. Sport Exerc., 20:501-555, 1988.
18. Moseley, L., Smith, R., Hunt, A., and Gant, R.: Three-dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking in normal young male adult males. Clin. Biomech., 11:39-45, 1996.
19. Nachbauer, W., and Nigg, B.M.: Effects of arch height of the foot on ground reaction forces in running. Med. Sci. Sport Exerc., 24:1264-1269, 1992.
20. Nigg, B.M., Cole, G.K., and Nachbauer, W.: Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J. Biomech., 26:909-916, 1993.
21. Norkin, C.C., and Levangie, P.K.: Joint Structure and Function. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis, 1983, pp. 331-365.
22. Palastanga, N., Field, D., and Soames, R.: Anatomy and Human Movement: Structure and Function, 2nd Ed. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.
23. Rattanaprasert, U., Smith, R., Sullivan, M., and Gilleard, W.: Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals with stance phase of gait. Clin. Biomech. (in press).
24. Shores, M.: Footprint analysis in gait documentation. Phys. Ther., 60:1163-1167, 1980.
25. Simkin, A., and Leitcher, I.: Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot: a biomechanical model. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 28:149-152, 1990.
26. Simkin, A., Leitcher, I., Giladi, M., Stein, M., and Milgrom, C.: Combined effect of foot arch structure and orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle, 10:25-29, 1989.
27. Winer, B.J.: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York, McGraw Hill, 1962, pp. 298-374.
28. Winson, I.G., Lundberg, A., and Bylund, C.: The pattern of motion of the longitudinal arch of the foot. The Foot, 4:151-154, 1994.
29. Yang, S.M., Kayamo, J., Norimatsu, T., Fujita, M., Matsusaka, N., Suzuki, R., and Okumura, H.: Walking changes of the arches of the foot during walking. In Winter, D.A., Norman, R.W., and Wells, R.P. (eds.), Biomechanics IX-A. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics Publishers, 1985, pp. 417-422.