Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 391-397

  Hunt, Adrienne E ^a   Smith, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Control; Electromyography; Gait; Joint moments; Motion; Pes planus

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPOSITION; JOINTS (ANATOMY); MICROELECTRODES; MUSCLE; SKIN;

FOOT MOTION; FOOT MUSCLES; JOINT MOMENTS;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FLATFOOT; FOOT; FOREFOOT; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; PERONEUS MUSCLE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; FLATFOOT; FOOT; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TORQUE; WALKING;

EID: 1942486756     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bordelon R.L. Clinical assessment of the foot. Donatelli R.A. The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle. second ed. 1996;124-136 F.A. Davis Co. Philadelphia.
2. Clement D.B., Taunton J.E., Smart G.W., McNicol K.L. A survey of overuse running injuries. Phys. Sports Med. 9:1981;47-58.
3. Ferris L., Sharkey N.A., Smith T.S., Matthews D.K. Influence of extrinsic plantar flexors on forefoot loading during heel rise. Foot Ankle Int. 16:1995;464-473.
4. Franco A.H. Pes cavus and pes planus: analyses and treatment. Phys. Ther. 67:1987;688-694.
5. Fuller J., Liu L.-J., Murphy M.C., Mann R.W. A comparison of lower-extremity skeletal kinematics measured using skin- and pin-mounted markers. Hum. Mvt. Sci. 16:1997;219-242.
6. Gray E.G., Basmajian J.V. Electromyography and cinematography of leg and foot ("normal" and flat) during walking. Anat. Rec. 161:1968;1-16.
7. Heil B. Lower limb biomechanics related to running injuries. Physiotherapy. 76:1992;400-406.
8. Hunt A.E., Fahey A.J., Smith R.M. Static measures of calcaneal deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion during walking. Aust. J. Phys. 46:2000;9-16.
9. Hunt A.E., Smith R.M., Torode M. Extrinsic muscle activity, foot motion and ankle joint moments during the stance phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int. 22:2001;31-41.
10. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., Wootten M.E., Gainey J., Gorton G., Cochran G.V. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J. Orthop. Res. 7:1989;849-860.
11. Kaye R.A., Jahss M.H. Tibialis posterior: a review of anatomy and biomechanics in relation to support of the medial longitudinal arch. Foot Ankle Int. 11:1991;244-247.
12. Keenan A., Bach T.M. Video assessment of rearfoot movements during walking: a reliability study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 77:1996;651-655.
13. Koh T.J., Grabiner M.D. Cross talk in surface electromyograms of human hamstring muscles. J. Orthop. Res. 10:1992;701-709.
14. Lee R.Y.W., Munn J. Passive moment about the hip in straight leg raising. Clin. Biomech. 15:2000;330-334.
15. Maslen B., Ackland T. Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. Clin. Biomech. 9:1994;291-296.
16. Meglan D., Todd F. Kinetics of human locomotion. Rose J., Gamble J.G. Human Walking. 1994;73-99 Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
17. Nigg B.M. The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new paradigm. Clin. J. Sp. Med. 11:2001;2-9.
18. Olsen T.R., Saidei M.R. The evolutionary basis of some clinical disorders of the human foot: a comparative survey of the living primates. Foot Ankle Int. 3:1983;322-341.
19. Rattanaprasert U., Smith R., Sullivan M., Gilleard W. Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. Clin. Biomech. 14:1999;14-23.
20. Root M.L., Orien W.P., Weed J.H. Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot. 1977;Clinical Biomechanics Corporation, Los Angeles.
21. Simkin A., Leichter I., Giladi M., Stein M., Milgrom C. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 10:1989;25-29.
22. Stacoff A., Reinschmidt C., Nigg B.M., vandenBogert A.J., Lundberg A., Denoth J., Stussi E. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin. Biomech. 15:2000;54-64.
23. Vaughan C.L. Are joint torques the holy grail of human gait analysis? Hum. Mvt. Sci. 15:1996;423-443.
24. Wallensten R., Eriksson E. Intramuscular pressures in exercise-induced lower leg pain. Int. J. Sports Med. 5:1984;31-35.
25. Winer B.J., Brown D.R., Michels K.M. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 1991;McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
26. Winter D.A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 1990;John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
27. Winter D.A. The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological. 1991;University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo.
28. Wu G.et al. ISB recommendations on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part 1: ankle hip and spine. J. Biomech. 35:2002;543-548.
29. Yang J.F., Winter D.A. Surface EMG profiles during different walking cadences in humans. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys. 60:1985;485-491.