A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: Illusion effects on lower-limb movements

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 504-512

  Glover, Scott ^a,b   Dixon, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Illusion effects; Lower limb movements; Movement accuracy; M ller Lyer illusion; Visual feedback; Visual information

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARM; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEG; LEG MOVEMENT; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 1442286468     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1687-y     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Fookson O, Poizner H (1998) Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation. J Neurophys 79:2833-2846
2. Adamovich SG, Berkinblit MB, Fookson O, Poizner H (1999) Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. II Effects of movement speed toward kinesthetically defined targets. Exp Brain Res 125:200-210
3. Brenner E, Smeets J (1996) Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Exp Brain Res 111:473-476
4. Bridgeman B, Peery S, Anand S (1997) Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of space. Percept Psychophys 59:456-469
5. Bruno N (2001) When does action resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 5:379-382
6. Carey DP (2001) Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 5:109-113
7. Cohen J (1994) The Earth is round (p<.05). Am Psychologist 49:997-1003
8. Corlett JT, Patla AE, Williams JG (1985) Locomotor estimation of distance after visual scanning by children and adults. Perception 14:257-263
9. Danckert JA, Sharif N, Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2002) A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus on-line control. Exp Brain Res 144:275-280
10. Daprati E, Gentilucci M (1997) Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35:1577-1582
11. Dixon P (1998) Why scientists value p values. Psychonom Bull Rev 5:390-396
12. Dixon P, O'Reilly T (1999) Scientific versus statistical inference. Can J Exp Psychol 53:133-149
13. Elliott D (1986) Continuous visual information may be important after all: a failure to replicate Thomson. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 12:388-391
14. Elliott D, Allard F (1985) The utilisation of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Q J Exp Psychol 37A:407-425
15. Elliott D, Lee TD (1995) The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychol Res 58:2-9
16. Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol (A) 39:541-559
17. Franz VH (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5:457-459
18. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner K, Bulthoff H, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20-25
19. Franz VH, Fahle M, Bulthoff H, Gegenfurtner K (2001) Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 27:1124-1144
20. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti M, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
21. Glover S (in press) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci
22. Glover S (2003) Optic ataxia as a deficit specific to the on-line control of actions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:441-456
23. Glover S (2002) Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cogn Sci 6:288-292
24. Glover S, Dixon P (2001a) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 27:560-572
25. Glover S, Dixon P (2001b) Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137:254-258
26. Glover S, Dixon P (2001c) The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Cdn J Exp Psychol 55:96-103
27. Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys 64:266-278
28. Goodale MA, Jakobson L, Keillor J (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159-1178
29. Goodman SN, Royall R (1988) Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health 78:1568-1574
30. Haffenden AM, Goodale M (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cog Neurosci 10:122-136
31. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11:177-181
32. Hu Y, Goodale MA (2000) Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. J Cogn Neurosci 12:856-868
33. Hu Y, Eagleson R, Goodale M (1999) The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Exp Brain Res 126:109-116
34. Loftus GR (1993) A picture is worth a thousand p values: On the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 25:250-256
35. Loomis JM, Da Silva J, Fujita N, Fukusima S (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 18:906-921
36. Milner AD, Goodale M (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Mon-Williams M, Bull R (2000) The Judd illusion: evidence for two visual streams or two experimental conditions? Exp Brain Res 130:273-276
38. Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. II. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407-420
39. Pavani F, Boscagli I, Benvenuti F, Rabuffetti M, Farne A (1999) Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Exp Brain Res 127:95-101
40. Poulton EC (1980) Range effects and asymmetric transfer in studies of motor skills. In: Nadeau CM et al. (eds) Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Human Kinetic Publishing, Champagne, IL, pp 339-359
41. Prablanc C, Echallier J, Komilis E, Jeannerod M (1979) Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. I Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information. Biol Cybern 35:113-124
42. Rozeboom WW (1960) The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychol Bull 57:416-428
43. Slack CW (1953) Some characteristics of the "range effect". J Exp Psychol 46:76-80
44. Smeets JB, Brenner E (1995) Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 21:19-31
45. Smeets JB, Brenner E (2001) Action beyond our grasp. Trends Cogn Sci 5:287
46. Smeets JB, Brenner E, De Grave DD, Cuijpers RH (2002) Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp Brain Res 147:135-144
47. Smeets JB, Glover S, Brenner E (2003) Modeling the time-dependent effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion. Spatial Vis 16:311-324
48. Steenhuis RE, Goodale M (1988) The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does an accuracy short-term memory for spatial location exist? J Mot Behav 20:399-415
49. Thomson JA (1983) Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 9:427-443
50. Vishton PM, Rea J, Cutting J, Nunez LN (1999) Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 25:1659-1672
51. Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2000) The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:456-463
52. Westwood DA, McEachern T, Roy E (2001) Delayed grasping of a Muller-Lyer figure. Exp Brain Res 141:166-173
53. Wraga M, Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2000) Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Muller-Lyer configuration. Psychol Sci 11:239-243
54. Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L (1983) Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Mot Behav 15:217-236