Mixed mating in a recently derived self-compatible population of Leavenworthia Alabamica (Brassicaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1005-1013

  Busch, Jeremiah W ^a   Herlihy, Christopher R ^b   Gunn, Lena ^a   Werner, William J ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bet hedging; Brassicaceae; Fluctuating environments; Inbreeding depression; Leavenworthia alabamica; Mating system; Pollen competition; Reproductive assurance

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DICOTYLEDON; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; OUTCROSSING; POLLEN; POLLINATION;

BRASSICACEAE; LEAVENWORTHIA ALABAMICA;

EID: 77953508703     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000032     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Armbruster, W. S., C. P. H. Mulder, B. G. Baldwin, S. Kalisz, B. Wessa, and H. Nute. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 89: 37-49.
2. Armbruster, P., and D. H. Reed. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522-524.
4. Barrett, S. C. H., R. W. Ness, and M. Vallejo-Marin. 2009. Evolutionary pathways to self-fertilization in a tristylous plant species. New Phytologist 183: 546-556.
5. Bateman, A. J. 1956. Cryptic self-incompatibility in the wallflower: Cheiranthus cheiri. Heredity 10: 257-261.
6. Becerra, J. X., and D. G. Lloyd. 1992. Competition-dependent abscission of self-pollinated flowers of Phormium tenax (Agavaceae): A second action of self incompatibility at the whole flower level? Evolution 46: 458-469.
7. Brown, A. H. D., and R. W. Allard. 1970. Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66: 133-145.
8. Busch, J. W. 2005a. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1503-1512.
9. Busch, J. W. 2005b. Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 94: 159-165.
10. Busch, J. W., S. Joly, and D. J. Schoen. In press. Does mate limitation in self-incompatible species promote the evolution of selfing? The case of Leavenworthia alabamica. Evolution: doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00925.x.
11. Busch, J. W., J. Sharma, and D. J. Schoen. 2008. Molecular characterization of Lal2, an SRK -like gene linked to the S-locus in the wild mustard Leavenworthia alabamica. Genetics 178: 2055-2067.
12. Byers, D., and D. M. Waller. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 30: 479-513.
13. Charlesworth, D. 1988. Evolution of homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 60: 445-453.
14. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of S -allele systems. Heredity 43: 41-55.
15. Charlesworth, D., and Z. Yang. 1998. Allozyme diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Heredity 81: 453-461.
16. Cheptou, P.-O., and U. Dieckmann. 2002. The evolution of selffertilization in density-regulated populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 269: 1177-1186.
17. Cheptou, P.-O., and D. J. Schoen. 2002. The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. Evolution 56: 1059-1062.
18. Cheptou, P.-O., and D. J. Schoen. 2007. Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant mating systems. Oikos 116: 271-279.
19. Cruzan, M. B., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Contribution of cryptic self-incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47: 925-934.
20. Eckert, C. G. 2002. Effect of geographical variation in pollinator fauna on the mating system of Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 123-132.
21. Eckert, C. G., and M. Allen. 1997. Cryptic self-incompatibility in trystylous Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1391-1397.
22. Eckert, C. G., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1994. Post-pollination mechanisms and the maintenance of outcrossing in self-compatible Decodon verticillatus. Heredity 72: 396-411.
23. Eckert, C. G., S. Kalisz, M. A. Geber, R. Sargent, E. Elle, P.-O. Cheptou, C. Goodwillie, et al. 2009a. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 35-43.
24. Eckert, C. G., B. Ozimec, C. R. Herlihy, C. A. Griffin, and M. B. Routley. 2009b. Floral morphology mediates temporal variation in the mating system of a self compatible plant. Ecology 90: 1540-1548.
25. Ellstrand, N. C., and D. L. Marshall. 1986. Patterns of multiple paternity in populations of Raphanus sativus. Evolution 40: 837-842.
26. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11: 53-63.
27. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on fl oral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 177: 802-810.
28. Galloway, L. F., J. R. Etterson, and J. L. Hamrick. 2003. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid, Campanula americana. Heredity 90: 308-315.
29. Goodwillie, C. 2008. Transient SI and the dynamics of self-incompatibility alleles: A simulation model and empirical test. Evolution 62: 2105-2111.
30. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79.
31. Goodwillie, C., K. L. Partis, and J. W. West. 2004. Transient self-incompatibility confers delayed selfing in Leptosiphon jepsonii. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 387-394.
32. Goodwillie, C., R. D. Sargent, C. G. Eckert, E. Elle, M. A. Geber, M. O. Johnston, D. A. Moeller, et al. 2010. Correlated evolution of mating system and fl oral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. New Phytologist 185: 311-321.
33. Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2004. Experimental dissection of inbreeding and its adaptive signifi cance in a flowering plant. Evolution 58: 2693-2703.
34. Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2007. Evolutionary analysis of a key fl oral trait in Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae): Genetic variation in herkogamy and its effect on the mating system. Evolution 61: 1661-1674.
35. Holsinger, K. E. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: The evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138: 606-622.
36. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 50: 54-70.
37. Johnston, M. O. 1993. Tests of two hypotheses concerning pollen competition in a self-compatible, long-styled species (Lobelia cardinalis: Lobeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1400-1406.
38. Johnston, M. O. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: Pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 102-103: 267-278.
39. Kalisz, S., D. W. Vogler, and K. M. Hanley. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430: 884-887.
40. Kruszewski, L. J., and L. F. Galloway. 2006. Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): Geitonogamy and cryptic self incompatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 455-461.
41. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 40: 388-404.
42. Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1994. Conditions favoring stable mixed mating systems with jointly evolving inbreeding depression. Journal of Theoretical Biology 170: 15-23.
43. Levin, D. A. 1996. The evolutionary signifi cance of pseudo-self-fertility. American Naturalist 148: 321-332.
44. Llaurens, V., V. Castric, F. Austerlitz, and X. Vekemans. 2008. High paternal diversity in the self-incompatible herb Arabidopsis halleri despite clonal reproduction and spatially restricted pollen dispersal. Molecular Ecology 17: 1577-1588.
45. Lloyd, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 195: 3-134.
46. Lloyd, D. G. 1968. Pollen tube growth and seed set in self-incompatible and self-compatible Leavenworthia (Cruciferae) populations. New Phytologist 67: 179-195.
47. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
48. Lloyd, D. G. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380. doi: 10.1086/297041
49. Mable, B. K., A. V. Robertson, S. Dart, C. DiBerardo, and L. Witham. 2005. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in the perennial Arabidopsis lyrata (Brassicaceae) and its genetic consequences. Evolution 59: 1437-1448.
50. Marshall, D. L., and P. K. Diggle. 2001. Mechanisms of differential pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. American Journal of Botany 88: 242-257.
51. Molecular Ecology Resources Primer Development Consortium, et al. 2009. Permanent genetic resources added to molecular ecology resources database 1 May 2009-31 July 2009. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1460-1466.
52. Morgan, M. T., and W. G. Wilson. 2005. Self-fertilization and escape from pollen limitation in variable pollination environments. Evolution 59: 1143-1148.
53. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. Loss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression. Evolution 59: 46-60.
54. Ritland, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity 81: 235-237.
55. Ritland, K. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
56. Rollins, R. C. 1963. The evolution and systematic of Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions of the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 192: 3-98.
57. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
58. Schoen, D. J., and A. H. D. Brown. 1991. Whole and part-flower selfpollination in Glycine clandestine and G. argyrea and the evolution of autogamy. Evolution 45: 1651-1654.
59. Schoen, D. J., and D. G. Lloyd. 1984. The selection of cleistogamy and hetermorphic diaspores. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 303-322.
60. Snow, A. A., and S. J. Mazer. 1988. Gametophytic selection in Raphanus raphanistrum: A test for heritable variation in pollen competitive ability. Evolution 42: 1065-1075.
61. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
62. Steets, J. A., J. R. Auld, D. E. Wolf, and T.-L. Ashman. 2007. The role of natural enemies in the expression and evolution of mixed mating in hermaphroditic plants and animals. Evolution 61: 2043-2055.
63. Stone, J. L. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 17-32.
64. Stone, J. L., M. A. Sasuclark, and C. P. Bloomberg. 2006. Variation in the self-incompatibility response within and among populations of the tropical shrub Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 592-598.
65. Travers, S. E., and S. J. Mazer. 2000. The absence of cryptic self-incompatibility in Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 191-196.
66. Uyenoyama, M. K. 1986. Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: The evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40: 388-404.
67. Vallejo-Marin, M., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of selffertilization. Annals of Botany 103: 951-962.
68. Vallejo-Marin, M., and M. K. Uyenoyama. 2004. On the evolutionary costs of self-incompatibility: Incomplete reproductive compensation due to pollen limitation. Evolution 58: 1924-1935.
69. Walsh, N. E., and D. Charlesworth. 1992. Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 19-37.
70. Willson, M. F., and N. Burley. 1983. Mate choice in plants: Tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
71. Wolfe, L. M., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1988. Temporal changes in the pollinator fauna of tristylous Pontederia cordata, an aquatic plant. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1421-1424.
72. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 2, The theory of gene frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.