Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant mating systems

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 271-279

  Cheptou, Pierre Olivier ^a   J Schoen, Daniel ^b  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; EVOLUTION; FITNESS; PLANT; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 33846414285     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.14655.x     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Anderson, B. et al. 2003. Facilitated selfing offers reproductive assurance: a mutualistism between a hemipteran and carnivorous plant. - Am. J. Bot. 90: 1009-1015.
2. Armbruster, P. and Reed, D. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign an stressfull environments. - Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Ashman, T. L. et al. 2004. Pollen limitatio n of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. - Ecology 85: 2408-2421.
4. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after "long distance" dispersal. - Evolution 9: 347-348.
5. Baker, H. G. 1967. Support for Baker's law as a rule. - Evolution 21: 853-856.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. and Harder, L. D. 1996. Ecology and evolution of plant mating system. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 73-79.
7. Bijlsma, R. et al. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1125-1137.
8. Brommer, J. E. 2000. The evolution of fitness in life-history theory. - Biol. Rev. 75: 377-404.
9. Burd, M. 1995. Ovule packaging in stochastic pollination and fertilization environments. - Evolution 49: 100-109.
10. Byers, D. L. and Waller, D. M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating system history on inbreeding depression. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 479-513.
11. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. - Sinauer.
12. Charlesworth B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations (2nd ed.). - Cambridge Univ. Press.
13. Charlesworth, B. et al. 1991. Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial self-fertilization. - Genet. Res. Camb. 57: 177-194.
14. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
15. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. - Evolution 44: 870-888.
16. Charlesworth, D. et al. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. - Evolution 44: 1469-1489.
17. Cheptou, P. O. and Dieckmann, U. 2002. The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populations. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1177-1186.
18. Cheptou, P. O. and Schoen, D. J. 2002. The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. - Evolution 56: 1059-1062.
19. Cheptou, P. O. and Schoen, D. J. 2003. Frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in Amsinckia. - Am. Nat. 162: 744-753.
20. Darwin, C. R. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. - Murray, London.
21. Dole, J. and Ritland, K. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerationnal changes in inbreeding coefficient. - Evolution 47: 361-373.
22. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. - Ann. Eugen. 11: 53-63.
23. Goodwillie, C. et al. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36: 47-79.
24. Heino, M. et al. 1998. The enigma of frequency-dependent selection. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 367-370.
25. Herlihy, C. R. and Eckert, C. G. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plants. - Nature 416: 320-323.
26. Herrera, C. M. et al. 2001. Geographical variation in autonomous self-pollination levels unrelated to pollinator service in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 88: 1025-1032.
27. Holsinger, K. E. 1988. Inbreeding doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. - Evolution 42: 1235-1244.
28. Holsinger, K. E. 1991a. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 307-308.
29. Holsinger, K. E. 1991b. Mass action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionnary stability of mixed mating systems. - Am. Nat. 138: 606-622.
30. Holsinger, K. E. 1996. Pollination biology and the evolution of mating systems in flowering plant. - Evol. Biol. 29: 107-149.
31. Holsinger, K. E. 2000. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7037-7042.
32. Husband, B. and Schemske, D. W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. - Evolution 50: 54-70.
33. Jain, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 469-495.
34. Kalisz, S. and Vogler, D. W. 2003. Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. - Ecology 84: 2928-2942.
35. Klips, R. A. and Snow, A. A. 1997. Delayed autonomous selfpollination in Hibiscus laevis (Malvaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 84: 48-53.
36. Knight, T. 1799. Experiments on the fecundation of vegetables. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 89: 195-204.
37. Lande, R. 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. - Ecology 63: 607-615.
38. Lande, R. and Schemske, D. W. 1985. The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. - Evolution 39: 24-40.
39. Lloyd, D. G. 1977. Genetic and phenotypic models of natural selection. - J. Theor. Biol. 69: 543-560.
40. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. - Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
41. Lloyd, D. G. 1980. Demographic factors and mating patterns in Angiosperms. - In: Solbrig, O. T. (ed.), Demography and evolution in plant populations. Univ. California Press, pp. 67-88.
42. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
43. Metz, J. A. J. et al. 1992. How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 198-202.
44. Morgan, M. T. and Wilson, W. G. 2005. Self-fertilization and the escape from pollen limitation in variable pollination environments. - Evolution 59: 1143-1148.
45. Pannell, J. R. and Barrett, C. H. 1998. Bakers'law: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. - Evolution 52: 657-668.
46. Ronfort, J. and Couvet, D. 1995. A stochastic model of selection on the selfing rates in structured populations. - Genet. Res. 65: 209-222.
47. Schmitt, J. and Ehrhardt, D. W. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. - Evolution 44: 269-278.
48. Schueller, S. K. 2004. Self-pollination in island and mainland populations of the introduced hummingbird-pollinated plant, Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae). - Am. J. Bot 91: 672-681.
49. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in higher plants. - Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 337-354.
50. Uyenoyama, M. K. 1986. Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practcing biparental inbreeding. - Evolution 40: 344-388.
51. Uyenoyama, M. K. et al. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self fertilization. - Oxford Survey Evol. Biol. 9: 327-381.
52. Vogler, D. W. and Kalisz, S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. - Evolution 55: 202-204.
53. Ward, M. et al. 2005. To self, or not to self...a review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. - Heredity 95: 246-254.
54. Yampolsky, C. and Yampolsky, H. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. - Bibl. Genet. 3: 1-62.