Recovery After Open and Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Comparison

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 11-16

  Kahokehr, Arman ^a   Sammour, Tarik ^a   Zargar Shoshtari, Kamran ^a   Srinivasa, Sanket ^a   Hill, Andrew G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY INSUFFICIENCY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMENTIA; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEMICOLECTOMY; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; STOMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL RECOVERY SCORE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953476769     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zargar-Shoshtari K., Paddison J.S., Booth R.J., et al. A prospective study on the influence of a fast-track program on postoperative fatigue and functional recovery after major colonic surgery. J Surg Res 154 (2009) 330
2. Zargar-Shoshtari K., and Hill A.G. Postoperative fatigue: A review. World J Surg 33 (2009) 738
3. Rubin G.J., Hardy R., and Hotopf M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence and severity of postoperative fatigue. J Psychosom Res 57 (2004) 317
4. McCutcheon T., Knepp T., Richards N., et al. Comparison of quality of life of persons who have experienced amputations and persons who have had bowel resections. Gastroenterol Nurs 28 (2005) 221
5. Di Fabio F., Koller M., Nascimbeni R., et al. Long-term outcome after colorectal cancer resection. Patients' self-reported quality of life, sexual dysfunction, and surgeons' awareness of patients' needs. Tumori 94 (2008) 30
6. Wind J., Polle S.W., Fung Kon Jin P.H., et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93 (2006) 800
7. Sammour T., Zargar-Shoshtari K., Bhat A., et al. A program of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. NZMJ (2009) in press
8. Gouvas N., Tan E., Windsor A., et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 24 (2009) 1119
9. Tjandra J.J., and Chan M.K. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8 (2006) 375
10. Young-Fadok T.M., Fanelli R.D., Price R.R., et al. Laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer: An evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1063
11. Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. Surgical recovery score. Available at: http://surgicalrecovery.weebly.com/. Accessed September 12, 2009.
12. Paddison J.S., Booth R.J., Hill A.G., et al. Comprehensive assessment of peri-operative fatigue: Development of the Identity-Consequence Fatigue Scale. J Psychosom Res 60 (2006) 615
13. Kahokehr A., Sammour T., Zargar-Shoshtari K., et al. Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg 7 (2009) 16
14. Kahokehr A., Sammour T., Sahakian V., et al. Influences of length of stay in an enhanced recovery program in colonic surgery. Colorectal Dis (2009) 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02228.x
15. Tekkis P.P., Prytherch D.R., Kocher H.M., et al. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91 (2004) 1174
16. Buzby G.P., Knox L.S., Crosby L.O., et al. Study protocol: A randomized clinical trial of total parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 47 (1988) 366
17. Dindo D., Demartines N., and Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240 (2004) 205
18. Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L., et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg 250 (2009) 187
19. Dowson H., Cowie A., Ballard K., et al. Systematic review of quality of life following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10 (2008) 757
20. Lohsiriwat V., Lohsiriwat D., Chinswangwatanakul V., et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted versus transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5 (2007) 49
21. Braga M., Frasson M., Vignali A., et al. Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: Results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246 (2007) 1010 discussion 1014
22. Tan W.S., Chew M.H., Ooi B.S., et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: A comparison of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 24 (2009) 1333
23. Zargar-Shoshtari K., Connolly A.B., Israel L.H., et al. Fast-track surgery may reduce complications following major colonic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51 (2008) 1633
24. Wind J., Hofland J., Preckel B., et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; Laparoscopy and/or Fast track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 6 (2006) 16
25. Basse L., Jakobsen D.H., Bardram L., et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: A randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 416
26. King P.M., Blazeby J.M., Ewings P., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93 (2006) 300