Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: Results of a randomized trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 246, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1010-1014

  Braga, Marco ^a   Frasson, Matteo ^a   Vignali, Andrea ^a   Zuliani, Walter ^a   Di Carlo, Valerio ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON CANCER; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATING ROOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; COLECTOMY; COLONIC DISEASES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36549049351     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4065     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1111-1124.
2. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 2002;236:759-767.
3. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:413-424.
4. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
5. Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187-1192.
6. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
7. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:890-895.
8. Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, et al. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:67-72.
9. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, et al. Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:675-679.
10. Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, et al. Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:S24-S28.
11. Baker RP, Titu LV, Hartley JE, et al. A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1675-1679.
12. Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:323-326.
13. Leung KL, Meng WC, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic carcinoma: a case-control study. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71:97-100.
14. Baca I, Perko Z, Bokan I, et al. Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:650-655.
15. Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1487-1492.
16. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2217-2223.
17. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-randomised trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1987-1991.
18. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2006;93:300-308.
19. Fujita J, Uyama I, Sugioka A, et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectmy with radical lymph node dissection using the no-touch isolation technique for advanced colon cancer. Surg Today. 2001;31:93-96.
20. Young-Fadok TM, Hall Long K, McConnell EJ, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease: improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:450-454.
21. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:605-610.
22. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1-8.
23. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomised clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:409-417.
24. Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW, et al. Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg. 1997;21:214-217.