Social information and community dynamics: Nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management

Ecological Applications

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1764-1773

  Fletcher Jr , Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

American Redstart; Competition; Conspecific attraction; Empidonax minimus; Heterospecific attraction; Heterospecific avoidance; Inadvertent social information; Indirect effect; Least Flycatcher; Metacommunity; Setophaga ruticilla

Indexed keywords

AVES; EMPIDONAX MINIMUS; SETOPHAGA; SETOPHAGA RUTICILLA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; MONTANA; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRDS;

EID: 55949106691     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-1850.1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahlering, M. A., and J. Faaborg. 2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk 123:301-312. (Pubitemid 43726148)
2. Ahlering, M. A., D. H. Johnson, and J. Faaborg. 2006. Conspecific attraction in a grassland bird, the Baird's Sparrow. Journal of Field Ornithology 77:365-371. (Pubitemid 44760158)
3. Baker, C. F., and B. J. Hicks. 2003. Attraction of migratory inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and koaro (Galaxias brevipinnis) juveniles to adult galaxiid odours. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37:291-299. (Pubitemid 37261541)
4. Boulinier, T., J. D. Nichols, J. R. Sauer, J. E. Hines, and K. H. Pollock. 1998. Estimating species richness: The importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79:1018-1028. (Pubitemid 28378710)
5. Briskie, J. V. 1994. Least Flycatcher (Empidonax minimus). Number 99 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
6. Brudvig, L. A., C. M. Mabry, J. R. Miller, and T. A. Walker. 2007. Evaluation of central North American prairie management based on species diversity, life form, and individual species metrics. Conservation Biology 21:864-874. (Pubitemid 46802197)
7. Damschen, E. I., N. M. Haddad, J. L. Orrock, J. J. Tewksbury, and D. J. Levey. 2006. Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales. Science 313:1284-1286. (Pubitemid 44330951)
8. Danchin, E., L.-A. Giraldeau, T. J. Valone, and R. H. Wagner. 2004. Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487-491. (Pubitemid 38971332)
9. Danielson, B. J., and M. S. Gaines. 1987. The influences of conspecific and heterospecific residents on colonization. Ecology 68:1778-1784.
10. Dunning, J. B., Jr., editor. 1993. CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
11. Elmberg, J., H. Poysa, K. Sjoberg, and P. Nummi. 1997. Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: Observations and an experiment. Oecologia 111:129-136.
12. Fleishman, E., R. B. Blair, and D. D. Murphy. 2001. Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications 11:1489-1501. (Pubitemid 32965098)
13. Fletcher, R. J., Jr. 2007. Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:598-606. (Pubitemid 46606834)
14. Fletcher, R. J., Jr., R. R. Koford, and D. A. Seaman. 2006. Critical demographic parameters for declining songbirds breeding in restored grasslands. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:145-157.
15. Gautier, P., K. Olgun, N. Uzum, and C. Miaud. 2006. Gregarious behaviour in a salamander: Attraction to conspecific chemical cues in burrow choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59:836-841.
16. Hahn, B. A., and E. D. Silverman. 2006. Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American Redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song. Biology Letters 2:337-340. (Pubitemid 44387356)
17. Hahn, B. A., and E. D. Silverman. 2007. Managing breeding forest songbirds with conspecific song playbacks. Animal Conservation 10:436-441. (Pubitemid 350020094)
18. Hines, J. E., T. Boulinier, J. D. Nichols, J. R. Sauer, and K. H. Pollock. 1999. COMDYN: Software to study the dynamics of animal communities using a capture-recapture approach. Bird Study 46:209-217.
19. Holl, K. D., E. E. Crone, and C. B. Schultz. 2003. Landscape restoration: Moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience 53:491-502. (Pubitemid 36684604)
20. Hoover, J. P. 2003. Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the Prothonotary Warbler. Ecology 84:416-430. (Pubitemid 36893079)
21. Kery, M., and H. Schmid. 2006. Estimating species richness: Calibrating a large avian monitoring programme. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:101-110.
22. Knopf, F. L., R. R. Johnson, T. Rich, F. B. Samson, and R. C. Szaro. 1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272-284.
23. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24. Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601-613. (Pubitemid 38847749)
25. Louda, S. M., R. W. Pemberton, M. T. Johnson, and P. A. Follett. 2003. Nontarget effects-The Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology 48:365-396. (Pubitemid 37365397)
26. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, USA.
27. Mills, N. E., and R. D. Semlitsch. 2004. Competition and predation mediate the indirect effects of an insecticide on southern leopard frogs. Ecological Applications 14:1041-1054. (Pubitemid 39188055)
28. Mönkkönen, M., R. Hardling, J. T. Forsman, and J. Tuomi. 1999. Evolution of heterospecific attraction: Using other species as cues in habitat selection. Evolutionary Ecology 13: 91-104. (Pubitemid 29323976)
29. Mönkkönen, M., P. Helle, and K. Soppela. 1990. Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): Heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85:218-225.
30. Morris, D. W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: A case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136:1-13. (Pubitemid 36832236)
31. Muller, K. L. 1998. The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper. Animal Behaviour 56:479-485. (Pubitemid 28402854)
32. Nichols, J. D., T. Boulinier, J. E. Hines, K. H. Pollock, and J. R. Sauer. 1998. Estimating rates of local species extinction, colonization, and turnover in animal communities. Ecological Applications 8:1213-1225. (Pubitemid 28548004)
33. Nocera, J. J., G. J. Forbes, and L.-A. Giraldeau. 2006. Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273:349-355. (Pubitemid 46768079)
34. Orrock, J. L., and R. J. Fletcher, Jr. 2005. Changes in community size affect the outcome of competition. American Naturalist 166:107-111. (Pubitemid 40886777)
35. Parker, M. W., S. W. Kress, R. T. Golightly, H. R. Carter, E. B. Parsons, S. E. Schubel, J. A. Boyce, G. J. McChesney, and S. M. Wisely. 2007. Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds 30:17-28. (Pubitemid 46882160)
36. Pearson, D. E., and R. M. Callaway. 2005. Indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents: Implications for biological control. Biological Control 35: 288-298. (Pubitemid 41618323)
37. Power, M. E., D. Tilman, J. A. Estes, B. A. Menge, W. J. Bond, L. S. Mills, G. Daily, J. C. Castilla, J. Lubchenco, and R. T. Paine. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience 46:609-620.
38. Reed, J. M., and S. H. Levine. 2005. A model for behavioral regulation of metapopulation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 183:411-423. (Pubitemid 40323498)
39. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2006. The North American breeding bird survey: Results and analysis 1966-2005. Version 6.2.2006. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
40. Schlossberg, S. R., and M. P. Ward. 2004. Using conspecific attraction to conserve endangered birds. Endangered Species Update 21:132-138.
41. Seppänen, J. T., J. T. Forsman M. Mönkkönen, and R. L. Thomson 2007 Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88 1622-1633. (Pubitemid 351345182)
42. Sherry, T. W., and R. T. Holmes. 1997. American Redstart (Setophaga ruticilla). Number 277 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
43. Simeonovska-Nikolova, D. M. 2007. Interspecific social interactions and behavioral responses of Apodemus agrarius and Apodemus flavicollis to conspecific and heterospecific odors. Journal of Ethology 25:41-48. (Pubitemid 46122296)
44. Stamps, J. A. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. American Naturalist 131:329-347. (Pubitemid 19319886)
45. Swanson, E. M., S. M. Tekmen, and M. A. Bee. 2007. Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations? Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:921-932. (Pubitemid 350273448)
46. Thomson, R. L., J. T. Forsman, and M. Mönkkönen. 2003. Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: Testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Oecologia 134:431-438. (Pubitemid 36290169)
47. Ward, M. P., and S. Schlossberg. 2004. Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds. Conservation Biology 18:519-525. (Pubitemid 38459117)
48. White, C. 2006. Indirect effects of elk harvesting on ravens in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:539-545. (Pubitemid 43736921)