Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT;Deterioro de parámetros de los ítems en tests adaptativos informatizados: Estudio con eCAT

Psicothema

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 340-347

  Abad, Francisco José ^a   Olea, Julio ^a   Aguado, David ^a   Ponsoda, Vicente ^a   Barrada, Juan Ramón ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS;

EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77953382378     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abad, F.J., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Ximénez, C., y Mazuela, P. (2005). Efecto de las omisiones en la calibración de un test adaptativo informatizado. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Supl., 1-6.
2. Bolt, D. (2002). Studying the potential of nuisance dimensions using bundle DIF and multidimensional IRT analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans: LA.
3. Dodd, B.G. (1990). The effect of ítem selection procedure and stepsize on computerized adaptive attitude measurement using the rating scale model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 355-366.
4. Donoghue, J.R., y Isham, S.P. (1998). A comparison of procedures to detect ítem parameter drift. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 33-51.
5. Glas, C.A.W. (2000). Item calibration and parameter drift. En W.J. van der Linden y C.A.W. Glas (Eds.): Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 183-199). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Guo, F., y Wang, L. (2003). Online calibration and scale stability of a CAT program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago: IL.
7. Haebara, T. (1980). Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method. Japanese Psychological Research, 22, 144-149.
8. Hanson, B.A., y Beguin, A.A. (2002). Obtaining a common scale for IRT item parameters using separate versus oncurrent estimation in the common-item equating design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 3-24.
9. Harmes, J.C., Parshall, C.G., y Kromrey, J.D. (2003). Recalibration of IRT item parameters in a CAT: sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago: IL.
10. Holland, P.W. y Thayer, D.T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.I. Braun (Eds.): Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Mislevy, R.J., y Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG (version 3) [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
13. Olea, J., Abad,. y Ponsoda, V. (2002). Elaboración de un banco de ítems, predicción de la dificultad y diseño de anclaje. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, vol. especial, 427-430.
14. Olea, J., Abad, F.J., Ponsoda, V., y Ximénez, M.C. (2004). Un test adaptativo informatizado para evaluar el conocimiento del inglés escrito: diseño y comprobaciones psicométricas. Psicothema, 16, 519-525.
15. Olea, J., y Ponsoda, V. (1996). Tests adaptativos informatizados. En J. Muñiz (Coord.): Psicometría (pp. 730-783). Madrid: Universitas
16. Pommerich, M, y Segall, D.O. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
17. Ponsoda, V., Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Abad, F.J., y Ximénez, C. (2004). Los tests adaptativos informatizados: investigación actual. Metodología de las ciencias del comportamiento, Supl., 507-510.
18. Raju, N.S. (1988). The area between two item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53, 492-502.
19. Raju, N.S. (1999). DFIT5P: A Fortran program for calculating dichotomous DIF/DTF [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Illinois Institute of Technology.
20. Rubio, V.J., y Santacreu, J. (2003). TRASI. Test adaptativo informatizado para la evaluación del razonamiento secuencial y la inducción como factores de la habilidad intelectual general. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
21. Stocking, M.L. (1990). Specifying optimum examinees for item parameter estimation in item response theory. Psychometrika, 55, 461-475.
22. Thissen, D., Chen, W-H, y Bock, R.D. (2003). Multilog (version 7) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
23. Wang, T., y Kolen, M.J. (2001). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: Issues, criteria, and an example. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 19-49.
24. Wells, C.S., Subkoviak, M.J., y Serlin, R.C. (2002). The effect of item parameter drift on examinee ability estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 77-87.
25. Zwick, R. (2000). The assessment of differential item functioning in computer adaptive tests. En W.J. van der Linden y C.A.W. Glas (Eds.): Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 221-244). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Zwick, R., y Thayer, D.T. (2002). Application of an empirical Bayes enhancement of Mantel-Haenszel differential item functioning analysis to a computerized adaptive test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 57-76.