Using qualitative research to inform the development of a comprehensive outcomes assessment for asthma

Patient

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 269-282

  Turner Bowker, Diane M ^a   Saris Baglama, Renee N ^a   DeRosa, Michael A ^a   Paulsen, Christine A ^b   Bransfield, Christopher P ^b  

^a QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

^b Veridian InSight   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EMOTIONALITY; FAMILY STRESS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LEISURE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECREATION; SELF REPORT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 77953367682     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11313840-000000000-00000     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. DeWalt DA, Revicki DA. National Quality Measures Clearinghouse. Expert commentary: importance of patient- reported outcomes for quality improvement [online]. Available from URL: http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq. gov/resources/commentary.aspx?file=PROMIS.inc/ [Accessed 2008 Nov 24]
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Mission and budget: annual highlights 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/about/ highlt07. htm/ [Accessed 2008 Nov 24]
3. US Food and Drug Administration. The importance of patient- reported outcomes: it's all about the patients [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/fdac/ features/2006/606-patients.html/ [Accessed 2008 Nov 24]
4. Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, et al. Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med 2008 Jan; 23 (1): 77-80
5. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, et al. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage 2007 Jan-Mar; 30 (1): 21-29
6. Baker DW, Asch SM, Keesey JW, et al. Differences in education, knowledge, self-management activities, and health outcomes for patients with heart failure cared for under the chronic disease model: the improving chronic illness care evaluation. J Card Fail 2005 Aug; 11 (6): 405-413
7. Uslu AM, Stausberg J. Value of the electronic patient record: an analysis of the literature. J Biomed Inform 2008 Aug; 41 (4): 675-682
8. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006 May 16; 144 (10): 742-752
9. Bussey-Smith KL, Rossen RD. A systematic review of randomized control trials evaluating the effectiveness of interactive computerized asthma patient education programs. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2007 Jun; 98 (6): 507-516
10. Fiscella K, Geiger HJ. Health information technology and quality improvement for community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006 Mar-Apr; 25 (2): 405-412
11. Bu D, Pan E, Walker J, et al. Benefits of information technology- enabled diabetes management. Diabetes Care 2007 May; 30 (5): 1137-1142 (Pubitemid 46684638)
12. Embretson SE, Reise PE. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers, 2000
13. Chang CH. Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 Suppl. 1: 157-166
14. Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Eignor D, et al. Computer-adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000
15. Ware Jr JE, Bayliss MS, editors. The practical assessment of headache impact using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 887-1012
16. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, et al. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 Suppl. 1: 95-108
17. Chakravarty EF, Bjorner JB, Fries JF. Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 2007 Jun; 34 (6): 1426-1431
18. Cella D, Gerhson R, Lai S, et al. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 (Suppl. 1): 133-141
19. Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Roddey TS. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Serv Res 2005 Oct; 40 (5): 1694-1711
20. Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB, et al. Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (10): 2277-2291
21. Haley SM, Raczek AE, Coster WJ, et al. Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86 (5): 932-939
22. Turner-Bowker DM, Raczek AE, Bjorner JBB, et al. Real world applications of dynamic health assessment: lessons from the development and clinical field testing of five new prototype tools. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Quality of Life Research; 2006 Oct 14; Lisbon
23. Schwartz C, Welch G, Santiago-Kelley P, et al. Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Qual Life Res 2006; 15 (9): 1503-1518
24. Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Ware Jr JE, et al. An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59 (7): 715-723
25. Petersen MA, Groenvold M, Aaronson N, et al. Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Qual Life Res 2006; 15 (3): 315-329
26. Thissen D, Reeve BB, Bjorner JB, et al. Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality Life Res 2007; 16 (Suppl. 1): 109-119
27. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, et al. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61 (1): 17-33
28. Walter OB, Becker J, Bjorner JB, et al. Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for 'anxiety' (Anxiety- CAT). Quality Life Res 2007; 16 (1): 143-155
29. Kocalevent RD, Rose M, Becker J, et al. An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. J Clin Epidemiol 2009 Mar; 62 (3): 278-287
30. Kopec JA, Badii M, McKenna M, et al. Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5DQOL. Spine 2008 May 20; 33 (12): 1384-1390
31. Reeve BB, Burke LB, Chiang YP, et al. Enhancing measurement in health outcomes research supported by agencies within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 Suppl. 1: 175-186
32. Perez L, Huang J, Jansky L, et al. Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions. J Neurosci Nurs 2007 Dec; 39 (6): 342-353
33. Carbone ET. Use of cognitive interview techniques in the development of nutrition surveys and interactive nutrition messages for low-income populations. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102 (5): 690-696
34. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Medicine 2003 May; 12 (3): 229-238
35. Dumas JF, Redish JC. A practical guide to usability testing. Westport (CT):Greenwood PublishingGroup Inc., 1993
36. George M, Apter AJ. Gaining insight into patients' beliefs using qualitative research methodologies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2004 Jun; 4 (3): 185-189
37. Guidance for industry patient-reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support marketing claims [report no. HFA-305]. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2006 Feb
38. Dillman DA, Symth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009
39. Dillman DA, Gertseva A, Mahon-Haft T. Achieving usability in establishment surveys through the application of visual design principles. J Off Stat 2005; 21 (2): 183-214
40. Mullin PA, Lohr KH, Bresnahan BW, et al. Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments. Medicine 2000; 9 (1): 13-27
41. Donald KJ, McBurney H, Browning C. Self management beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of adults with severe life threatening asthma requiring an admission to hospital. Aust Fam Physician 2005 Mar; 34 (3): 197-200
42. Goeman DP, Douglass JA. Understanding asthma in older Australians: a qualitative approach.Med J Aust 2005 Jul 4; 183 (1 Suppl.): S26-7
43. Haugbolle LS, Sorensen EW. Drug-related problems in patients with angina pectoris, type 2 diabetes and asthma: interviewing patients at home. Pharm World Sci 2006 Aug; 28 (4): 239-247
44. OregonDepartment of Human Services. People with asthma and caregivers of children with asthma: focus group report [online]. Available from URL: http://www.oregon.gov/ DHS/ph/asthma/docs/asthmafocusgroupreport.pdf/ [Accessed 2008 Oct 20]
45. Raynor DK, Savage I, Knapp P, et al. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004 May; 53 (2): 167-174
46. Vincent SD, Toelle BG, Aroni RA, et al. Exasperations of asthma: a qualitative study of patient language about worsening asthma. Med J Aust 2006 May 1; 184 (9): 451-454
47. Anhoj J, Nielsen L. Quantitative and qualitative usage data of an internet-based asthma monitoring tool [abstract]. J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 3; 6 (3): e23
48. Cleland J, Caldow J, Ryan D. A qualitative study of the attitudes of patients and staff to the use of mobile phone technology for recording and gathering asthma data. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13 (2): 85-89
49. Douglass JA, Goeman DP, Yu EA, et al. Asthma 3+ Visit Plan: a qualitative evaluation. Intern Med J 2005 Aug; 35 (8): 457-462
50. Hartmann CW, Sciamanna CN, Blanch DC, et al. A website to improve asthma care by suggesting patient questions for physicians: qualitative analysis of user experiences [abstract]. J Med Internet Res 2007; 9 (1): E3
51. Pinnock H, Slack R, Pagliari C, et al. Understanding the potential role of mobile phone-based monitoring on asthma self-management: qualitative study. Clin Exp Allergy 2007 May; 37 (5): 794-802
52. Smith JR, Mugford M, Holland R, et al. Psycho-educational interventions for adults with severe or difficult asthma: a systematic review. J Asthma 2007 Apr; 44 (3): 219-241
53. van Baar JD, Joosten H, Car J, et al. Understanding reasons for asthma outpatient (non)-attendance and exploring the role of telephone and e-consulting in facilitating access to care: exploratory qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2006 Jun; 15 (3): 191-195
54. Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, BaylissMS, et al. Asthma Impact Survey: a user's guide. Lincoln (RI): Quality- Metric Incorporated, 2003
55. Martin M, Fortin E, Maruish ME. The DYNHA Asthma Impact Survey: a user's guide. Lincoln (RI): Quality- Metric Incorporated, 2004
56. Turner-Bowker DM. Computerized adaptive assessment of asthma impact. SBIR grant # 1 R43 HL078252-01. Phase I final progress report. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated, 2005
57. Turner-Bowker DM, Saris-Baglama RN, Anatchkova MD, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a computerized adaptive assessment for asthma (ASTHMACAT(-)) [poster]. Annual meeting of the Academy Health; 2005 Jun 26-28; Boston (MA)
58. Anatchkova M, Turner-Bowker DM, Mosen D, et al. Computerized adaptive assessment of asthma impact [poster]. Annual meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine; 2005 Apr 13-16; Boston (MA)
59. Bayliss MS, KosinskiM, Turner-Bowker DM, et al. Asthma Control Test: a user's guide. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated, 2003
60. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. Am Acad Allergy, Asthma Immunol 2004; 113 (1): 59-65
61. Ware Jr JE, KosinskiM, Gandek B, et al. Development and testing of the SF-8 Health Survey [abstract]. Qual Life Res 2000; 9 (3): 307
62. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, et al. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln (RI): Quality- Metric Incorporated, 2001
63. Turner-Bowker D, Bayliss MS, Kosinski M, et al. Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions. Qual Life Res 2003; 12 (8): 1003-1012
64. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage, 1990
65. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Rev. ed. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1993
66. Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass, 1996
67. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, et al. Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax 1992; 47 (2): 76-83
68. Marks GB, Dunn SM, Woolcock AJ. A scale for the measurement of quality of life in adults with asthma. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45 (5): 461-472
69. Virzi RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Human Factors 1992; 34: 457-468
70. Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of the INTERCHI; 1993 Apr 24-29; New York. New York: ACM, 1993: 206-213
71. Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1997