Determining of student teachers self-confidence using technology in instruction;Öǧretmen adaylarinin eǧitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme özgüvenlerinin tespiti

Journal of Turkish Science Education

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 99-108

  Erdemir, Naki ^a   Bakirci, Hasan ^a   Eyduran, Ecevit ^a  

^a YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer and internet; Instructional technology; Student teachers; Using ability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953365099     PISSN: 13046020     EISSN: 13046020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akkoyulu, B. & Kurbanoǧlu, S. (2003). Öǧretmen adaylarinin bilgi okuryazarliǧi ve bilgisayar özyeterlik algilari üzerine bir çalişma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 1-10.
2. Aksoy, H. H. (2003). Uluslararasi karşilaştirma ölçütlerinin kullanimi ve Türkiye. Eǧitim Bilim Toplum. 1(1), 51-60.
3. Alkan, C., Deryakulu, D. & Şimşek, N. (1995). Eǧitim Teknolojisine Giriş: Disiplin, Süreç, Ürün. Ankara: Önder Matbaacilik Ltd.Şti.
4. Arslan, A. (2006). Bilgisayar destekli eǧitim yapmaya ilişkin tutum ölçeǧi. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 24-33.
5. Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Jounal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 803-815.
6. Christanse, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4) 411-434.
7. Collier, K. G., Paula, F.J. & Goff, R.J. (1971). Colleges of Education Learning Programmes: A proposal (Working Paper No.5). Washington, DC: Commission on Instructional Technology
8. Crowther, M. S., Keller, C. C. & Waddoups, G. L. (2004). Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 289-303.
9. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1), 63-90.
10. Erdemir, N. & Bakirci, H. (2009). Fen bilgisi öǧretmen adaylarinin branşlara karşi tutum gelişim ve deǧişimi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Fak. Dergisi, 17(1), 161-170.
11. Erdemir, N. & Çepni, S. (2007). Fizik öǧretmen adaylarinin yillara göre başari ve tutumlarinin etkileşim düzeyleri, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 60-69.
12. European Commission, (2001). Directorate-General for Education and Culture. European Report on the Quality of School Education. Sixteen Quality Indicators. Report based on the work of the working committee on quality indicators. Office for Official Publications of the Communities.
13. Fisher, M. (2000). Computer skills of initial teacher education students. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(1), 109-123.
14. Galpin, V. C., & Sander, I. D. (2007). Perceptions of Computer Science at a South African University, Computers & Education, 49, 1330-1356.
15. Goetsch, D. L. (1984). "Impact of technology on curriculum and delivery strategies in vocational education." in Shulman, Carol Herrnstadt. (Ed.) Adults and the Changing Workplace. American Vocational Association, Inc., 191-200.
16. Haydn, T. & Barton, R. (2007). Common needs and different agendas: How trainee teachers make progress in their ability to use ICT in subject teaching. Some lessons from the UK, Computers & Education, 49, 1018-1036.
17. Kaya, A. (2003). Fizik öǧretmenlerinin hizmet içi eǧitim ihtiyaçlarina yönelik bir laboratuar programi geliştirme ve model önerme, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayimlanmamiş Doktora Tezi, Trabzon.
18. Komis, V., Ergazakia, M, & Zogzaa, V. (2007). Comparing computer-supported dynamic modeling and 'paper & pencil' concept mapping technique in students' collaborative activity. Computers & Education, 49(4), 991-1017.
19. Levin, B.B. (1996). Using portfolios to fulfil ISTE/NCAIE technology requirements for preservice teacher candidates, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 12(3), 13-20.
20. McCannon, M., & Crews, T. B. (2000). Assessing the technology needs of elementary school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 111-121.
21. McGrail, E. (2005). Teachers, technology and change: English teachers' perspectives. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 5-24.
22. Milli Eǧitim Bakanliǧi (MEB), (2004). İlköǧretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4-5. siniflar) öǧretim programi, Ankara: Devlet Kitaplari Müdürlüǧü Basimevi.
23. Middlehurst, R. (1999). New realities for leadership and governance in higher education? Tertiary Education and Management. 5, 307-329.
24. National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation Arlington. 1, 34-51.
25. Oakes, J. & Martin, L. (2002). Struggling for educational equity in diverse communities: School reform as social movement. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 383-406.
26. Oral, B. (2008). The evaluation of the student teachers' attitudes toward Internet and democracy, Computers & Education, 50, 437-445.
27. Özden, M. Y., Çaǧiltay, K. & Çaǧiltay, E. (2004). Teknoloji ve eǧitim: Ülke deneyimleri ve Türkiye için dersler, İstanbul: 76-93.
28. Reiner, M. (2009). Sensory Cues, Visualization and Physics Learning, International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 343-364.
29. Rugayah, H., Hashim, H. & Wan, N. M. (2004). Attitudes toward learning about and working with computers of students at unit. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 3(2). 24-35.
30. Senge, P. (2000). Beşinci disiplin. 7. Baski. çevirenler: Ayşegül İldeniz ve Ahmet Doǧukan. Yapi Kredi Yayinlari, İstanbul: 121-129.
31. Simon, Y. R. (1983). Pursuit of happiness and lust for powerin technological society. InC.
32. Slowinski, J. (2000). Becoming a technologically savvy administrator. ERIC Digest 135.
33. Tekin, M. (1996). Yet işkin Eǧitiminde Radyo ve Televizyon. Ankara: Yüksel Matbaacilik.
34. Torkzadeh G. & Van Dyke, T. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer use attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 479-494.
35. Ufuktepe, Ü. (2000), Uniform integrability of the potential class K2, International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 3(4), 351-359.
36. Uysal, M., Özsoy, S., Sayilan, F., Günlü, R., Güngör, S., Aksoy, H. H. & Ünal, L. (2003). Eǧitimde Demokratikleşme. Eǧitim Yönetimi ve Üniversitede Demokratik Yapilanma Sempozyumu. Ankara. Eǧitim Sen Yayinlari, 15-55.
37. Uzman Psikolojik Danişman, (2005). Bilim ve aklin aydinliǧinda eǧitim, 68 (6), Vali Rahmi Bey İlköǧretim Okulu, İzmir.
38. Williams, H. S. & Kingham, M. (2003). Infusion of technology into the curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(3), 178-184.
39. Yenilmez, K. (2008), Open primary education school students' opinions about mathematics television programmes, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 9(4), 176-189.