Bilateral saccades increase intrahemispheric processing but not interhemispheric interaction: Implications for saccade-induced retrieval enhancement

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 128-134

  Lyle, Keith B ^a   Martin, Jessica M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Handedness; Interhemispheric interaction; Memory enhancement; Saccades

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953361781     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Banich M.T. The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition 1998, 36:128-157.
2. Banich M.T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task?. Cortex 1990, 26:77-94.
3. Barash S., Bracewell R.M., Fogassi L., Gnadt J.W., Andersen R.A. Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area II. Spatial properties. Journal of Neurophysiology 1991, 66:109-1124.
4. Brunyé T.T., Mahoney C.R., Augustyn J.S., Taylor H.A. Horizontal saccadic eye movements enhance retrieval of landmark shape and location information. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70:279-288.
5. Cabeza R. Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: The dual attentional processes hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1813-1827.
6. Cherbuin N., Brinkman C. Hemispheric interactions are different in left-handed individuals. Neuropsychology 2006, 20:700-707.
7. Christman S.D., Garvey K.J., Propper R.E., Phaneuf K.A. Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology 2003, 17:221-229.
8. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., Brown T.J. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology 2006, 15:607-616.
9. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., Dion A. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition 2004, 56:313-319.
10. Ciaramelli E., Grady C.L., Moscovitch M. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Neuropsychologica 2008, 46:1828-1851.
11. Compton R.J., Mintzer D.A. Effects of worry and evaluation stress on interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychology 2001, 15:427-433.
12. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1998, 95:831-838.
13. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
14. Cowell P.E., Kertesz A., Denenberg V.H. Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosum. Neurology 1993, 43:2353-2357.
15. Cronin-Golomb A.C., Gabrieli J.D.E., Keane M.M. Implicit and explicit memory retrieval within and across the disconnected cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychology 1996, 10:254-262.
16. de Haan B., Morgan P.S., Rorden C. Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions. Brain Research 2008, 14:102-111.
17. Deese J. Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall. Psychological Reports 1959, 5:305-312.
18. Eviatar Z., Zaidel E. Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres. Brain and Cognition 1994, 25:128-137.
19. Fecteau J.H., Enns J.T. Visual letter matching: Hemispheric functioning or scanning biases?. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1412-1428.
20. Kinsbourne M. The corpus callosum equilibrates the cerebral hemispheres. The parallel brain: The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus callosum 2003, 271-281. MIT Press, Cambridge. E. Zaidel, M. Iacoboni (Eds.).
21. Lyle K.B., Logan J.M., Roediger H.L. Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:515-520.
22. Lyle K.B., McCabe D.P., Roediger H.L. Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tests. Neuropsychology 2008, 22:523-530.
23. Moon S.Y., Barton J.J.S., Mikulski S., Polli F.E., Cain M.S., Vangel M., et al. Where left becomes right: A magnetoencephalographic study of sensorimotor transformation for antisaccades. NeuroImage 2007, 36:1313-1323.
24. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
25. Parker A., Buckley S., Dagnall N. Reduced misinformation effects following saccadic bilateral eye movements. Brain and Cognition 2008, 69:89-97.
26. Parker A., Dagnall N. Effects of bilateral eye movements on gist based false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Brain and Cognition 2007, 63:221-225.
27. Parker A., Relph S., Dagnall N. Effects of bilateral eye movements on the retrieval of item, associative, and contextual information. Neuropsychology 2008, 22:136-145.
28. Petit L., Clark V.P., Ingeholm J., Haxby J.V. Dissociation of saccade-related and pursuit-related activation in human frontal eye fields as revealed by fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77:3386-3390.
29. Pflugshaupt T., Nyffeler T., von Wartburg R., Hess C.W., Müri R.M. Loss of exploratory vertical saccades after unilateral frontal eye field damage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 2008, 79:474-477.
30. Phelps E.A., Hirst W., Gazzaniga M.S. Deficits in recall following partial and complete commissurotomy. Cerebral Cortex 1991, 1:492-498.
31. Pollman S., Zaidel E., von Cramon D.Y. The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:322-333.
32. Propper R.E., Christman S.D. Mixed-versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards " remember" versus " know" judgements in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory 2004, 12:707-714.
33. Propper R.E., Christman S.D., Phaneuf K.A. A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:751-757.
34. Propper R.E., Pierce J., Bellorado N., Geisler M.W., Christman S.D. Effects of bilateral eye movements on interhemispheric gamma EEG coherence. Implications for EMDR therapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2007, 95:785-788.
35. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Stanczak L. Differential effects of aging on the functions of the corpus callosum. Developmental Neuropsychology 2000, 18:113-137.
36. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Stanczak L., Miller A.C. Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: Two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychological Science 1999, 10:494-500.
37. Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented on lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
38. Summerfield C., Mangels J.A. Functional coupling between frontal and parietal lobes during recognition memory. NeuroReport 2005, 16:117-122.
39. Weissman D.H., Banich M.T. The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology 2000, 14:41-59.
40. Welcome S.E., Chiarello C., Towler S., Halderman L.K., Otto R., Leonard C.M. Behavioral correlates of corpus callosum size: Anatomical/behavioral relationships vary across sex/handedness groups. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2427-2435.
41. Witelson S.F. The brain connection: The corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science 1985, 229:665-668.