Intergenerational refl ections on doctoral supervision in nursing

Contemporary Nurse

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 83-91

  Jackson, Debra ^a   Darbyshire, Philip ^a,b   Luck, Lauretta ^a   Peters, Kath ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Philip Darbyshire Consulting   (Australia)

Author keywords

Doctoral education; Mentoring; Nursing; Professional relationship; Supervision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; TEACHER;

EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONS; MENTORS; NURSING;

EID: 77953352410     PISSN: 10376178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/conu.32.1-2.83     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anderson, C. (2000). Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: Are we prepared for the future? Journal of Professional Nursing, 16(4), 191-200.
2. Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend? Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 489-500.
3. Diekelmann, N., & Magnussen Ironside, P. (1998). Preserving writing in doctoral education: Exploring the concernful practices of schooling learning teaching. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(6), 1347-1355.
4. Evans, C. (2007). The experience of international doctoral education in nursing: An exploratory survey of staff and international nursing students in a British university. Nurse Education Today, 27(5), 499-505.
5. Fridlund, B. (2005). 10 challenges in supervision of doctoral students. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 4, 97-98.
6. Holligan, C. (2005). Fact or fiction: A case history of doctoral supervision. Educational Research, 47(3), 267-278.
7. Jackson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: A framework for developing sustainable research capacity in nursing. Collegian, 15(1), 27-33.
8. Jolley, J. (2007). Choose your doctorate. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 225-233.
9. Malfroy, J. (2005). Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 165-178.
10. Mitchell, T., & Carroll, J. (2008). Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors. Nurse Education Today, 28, 218-226.
11. Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189-207.
12. Thompson, D. R., & Kirkman, S. (2005). Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 25(4), 283-290.
13. Waldspurger Robb, W. (2005). The ABCs of doctoral degrees. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 24(2), 89-96.