The future of medical imaging

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 139, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 3-7

  Maidment, A D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FORECASTING; GENETIC PROCEDURES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FORECASTING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MOLECULAR PROBE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 77953346977     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq090     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pisano, E. D. et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology 236(2), 404-412 (2005).
2. Boone, J. M., Kwan, A. L. C., Nelson, T. R., Shah, N., Burkett, G., Seibert, J. A., Lindfors, K. K. and Roos, G. Performance assessment of a pendant-geometry CT scanner for breast cancer detection. In: Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging. Flynn, M. J. Ed. (San Diego, CA, USA: SPIE) pp. 319-323 (2005).
3. Wu, T., Moore, R., Rafferty, E. A. and Kopans, D. Advances in breast imaging-physics technology and clinical applications. In: RSNA. Karellas, A. Eds., pp. 149-163 (2004).
4. Niklason, L. T. et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205(2), 399-406 (1997).
5. Dobbins, J. T. 3rd and Godfrey, D. J. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys. Med. Biol. 48(19), R65-106 (2003).
6. Saslow, D. et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J. Clin. 57(2), 75-89 (2007).
7. Rosen, M. A. and Schnall, M. D. Dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging for assessing tumor vascularity and vascular effects of targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 13(2 Pt 2), 770-776 (2007).
8. Carton, A. K., Gavenonis, S. C., Currivan, J. A., Conant, E. F., Schnall, M. D. and Maidment, A. D. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis-a feasibility study. Br. J. Radiol (2009): 80279516V1.
9. Chen, S. C., Carton, A. K, Albert, M., Conant, E. F., Schnall, M. and Maidment, A. D. A. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis. Acad. Radiol. 14(2), 229-238 (2007).
10. Karathanasis, E., Chan, L., Karumbaiah, L., McNeeley, K., D'Orsi, C. J., Annapragada, A. V., Sechopoulos, I. and Bellamkonda, R. V. Tumor vascular permeability to a nanoprobe correlates to tumorspecific expression levels of angiogenic markers. PLoS One 4(6), e5843 (2009).
11. Boyd, N. F. et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 356(3), 227-236 (2007).
12. Bakic, P. R., Carton, A. K., Kontos, D., Zhang, C., Troxel, A. B. and Maidment, A. D. Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections. Radiology 252(1), 40-49 (2009).
13. Huo, Z., Giger, M. L., Olopade, O. I., Wolverton, D. E., Weber, B. L., Metz, C. E., Zhong, W. and Cummings, S. A. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225(2), 519-526 (2002).
14. Kontos, D., Bakic, P. R., Carton, A. K., Troxel, A. B., Conant, E. F. and Maidment, A. D. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study. Acad. Radiol. 16(3), 283-298 (2009).