Involvement of cytoskeleton in orientation of cell division in contact guided cells

Folia Biologica

Volumn 58, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 21-27

  Krzysiek Maczka, Gracjana ^a   Michalik, Marta ^a   Madeja, Zbigniew ^a   Korohoda, Wlodzimierz ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cell division; Cell polarization; Contact guidance; Cytokinesis

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS ANTIGEN; FENOFIBRATE; NUCLEAR MATRIX PROTEIN; NUMA1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLAST; GENETICS; HUMAN; KERATINOCYTE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANTIGENS, NUCLEAR; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; NUCLEAR MATRIX-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; PROCETOFEN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77953343322     PISSN: 00155497     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3409/fb58_1-2.21-27     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BURTON K., TAYLOR L. 1997. Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata. Nature 385: 450-454.
2. CAYOUETTE M., RAFF M. 2003. The orientation of cell division influences cell-fate choice in the developing mammalian retina. Development 130: 2329-2339.
3. DALBY M. J., BIGGS M. J. P., GADEGAARD N., KALNA G., WILKINSON C. D. W., CURTIS A. S. G. 2007. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J. Cell. Biochem. 100: 326-338.
4. D'AVINO P. P., SAVOLAN M. S.,GLOVER D. M. 2005. Cleavage furrow formation and ingression during animal cytokinesis: a microtubule legacy. J. Cell Sci. 118: 1549-1558.
5. EHRENGRUBER M. U., DENLEAU D. A., COATES T. D. 1996. Shape oscillations of human neutrophil: Characterization and relationship to cell motility. J. Exp. Biol. 199: 741-747.
6. FOE V. E., VON DASSOW G. 2008. Stable and dynamic microtubules coordinately shape the myosin activation zone during cytokinetic furrow formation. J. Cell Biol. 183: 457-470.
7. GELDMACHER-VOSS B., REUGELS A. M., PAULS S., CAMPOS-ORTEGA J. A. 2003. A90-degee rotation of the mitotic spindle changes the orientation of mitoses of zebrafish neuroepithelial cells. Development 130: 3767-3780.
8. HAUF S., WAIZENEGGER I. C., PETERS J. M. 2001. Cohesin cleavage by separase required for anaphase and cytokinesis in human cells. Science 293: 1320-1323.
9. KALTSCHMIDT J. A., BRAND A. H. 2002. Asymmetric cell division: microtubule dynamics and spindle asymmetry. J. Cell Sci. 115: 2257-2264.
10. KATO A., KURITA S., HAYASHI A., KAJI N., OHASHI K., MIZUNNO K. 2008. Critical roles of actin-interacting protein 1 in cytokinesis and chemotactic migration of mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 414: 261-270.
11. KOROHODA W., RZEHAK K. 1972. Local contraction-relaxation processes in Amphibian eggs induced by AC-electric fields. Acta Protozool. 11: 355-360.
12. KRZYSIEK-MACZKA G., KOROHODA W. 2008. Surface anisotropy orients cell divisions in contact guided cells. Folia biol. (Kraków) 56: 13-19.
13. MANDATO C. A., BENINK H. A., BEMENT W. M. 2000. Microtubule-actomyosin interactions in cortical flow and cytokinesis. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 45: 87-92.
14. MERDES A., RAMYAR K., KECHIO J. D., CLEVELAND D. W. 1996. A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 87: 447-458.
15. MURTHY K., WADSWORTH P. 2008. Dual role for microtubules in regulating cortical contractility during cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 121: 2350-2359.
16. NUMATA O., GONDA K., WATANABE A., KUROSAWA Y. 2000. Cytokinesis in Tetrahymena: Determination of division plane and organization of contractile ring. Microscopy Res. Tech. 49: 127-135.
17. ODELL G. M., FOE V. E. 2008. An agent-based model contrasts opposite effects of dynamic and stable microtubules on cleavage furrow positioning. J. Cell Biol. 183: 471-483.
18. RAPPAPORT R. 1999. Absence of furrowing activity following regional cortical tension reduction in sand dollar blastomere and fertilized egg fragment surfaces. Develop. Growth Differ. 41: 441-447.
19. ROBINSON D. N., SPUDICH J. A. 2000. Towards molecular understanding of cytokinesis. Trends in Cell Biol. 10: 228-237.
20. ROBINSON D. N., SPUDICH J. A. 2004. Mechanics and regulation of cytokinesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004 16: 182-188.
21. RUSAN N. M., PEIFER M. 2007. A role for a novel centrosome cycle in asymmetric cell division. J. Cell Biol. 177: 13-20.
22. SEERY J. P., WATT F. M. 2000. Asymmetric stem-cell divisions define the architecture of human oesophageal epithelium. Current Biology 10: 1447-1450.
23. STEPIEN E., STANISZ J., KOROHODA W. 1999. Contact guidance of chick embryo neurons on single scratches in glass and on underlying aligned human skin fibroblasts. Cell Biol. Intern. 23: 105-116.
24. THÉRY M., BORNENS M. 2006. Cell shape and cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18: 648-657.
25. THÉRY M., RACINE V., PEPIN A., PIEL M., CHEN Y., SIBARITA J. B., BORNENS M. 2005. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 10: 947-953.
26. THÉRY M., RACINE V., PIEL M., PÉPIN A., DIMITROW A., CHEN Y., SIBARITA J. B., BORNENS M. 2006. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 19771-19776.
27. THÉRY M., JIMÉNEZ-DALMARONI A., RACINE V., BORNENS M., JÜLICHER F. 2007. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 447: 493-497.
28. TOYOSHIMA F., NISHIDA E. 2007. Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1-and myosin X-dependent manner.EMBOJ. 26: 1487-1498.
29. TOYOSHIMA F., MATSUMURA S., MORIMOTO H., MITSUSHIMA M., NISHIDA E. 2007. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 regulates spindle orientation in adherent cells. Dev. Cell 13: 796-811.
30. UYEDA T.Q.P., KITAYAMA C., YUMURA S. 2000. Myosin IIindependent cytokinesis in Dictyostelium: its mechanism and implications. Cell Struct. Function 25: 1-10.
31. YAMASHITA Y. M., FULLER M. T. 2008. Asymmetric centrosome behaviour and the mechanisms of stem cell division. J. Cell Biol. 130: 261-266.
32. YUMURA S., FUKUI Y. 1998. Spatiotemporal dynamics of actin concentration during cytokinesis and locomotion in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 111: 2097-2108.
33. WERNER M.,GLOZER M. 2008. Control of cortical contractility during cytokinesis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36: 371-377.
34. WÓJCIAK-STOTHARD B., CURTIS A. S. G., MONAGHAN W., MCGRATH M., SOMMER I., WILKINSON C. D. W. 1995. Role of the cytoskeleton in the reaction of fibroblasts to multiple grooved substrata. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 31: 147-158.
35. ZHAO M., FORRESTER J. V., MCCAIG C. D. 1999. A small, physiological electric field orients cell divisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 4942-4946.
36. ZHOU F. Q.,WATERMAN-STORER C. M., COHAN C. S. 2002. Focal loss of actin bundles causes microtubule and growth cone turning. J.Cell Biol. 157: 837-849.