Quantitative 82Rb PET/CT: Development and validation of myocardial perfusion database

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1122-1128

  Santana, Cesar A ^a   Folks, Russell D ^a   Garcia, Ernest V ^a   Verdes, Liudmila ^a   Sanyal, Rupan ^a   Hainer, Jon ^b   Di Carli, Marcelo F ^b   Esteves, Fabio P ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; RUBIDIUM 82;

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REFERENCE VALUES; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34447297536     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.039750     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24-33.
2. Marwick TH, Shan K, Patel S, Go RT, Lauer MS. Incremental value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for prognostic assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:865-870.
3. Lodge MA, Braess H, Mahmoud F, et al. Developments in nuclear cardiology: transition from single photon emission computed tomography to positron emission tomography-computed tomography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17:491-496.
4. Schelbert HR, Wisenberg G, Phelps ME, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VI. Detection of coronary artery disease in human beings with intravenous N-13 ammonia and positron computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:1197-1207.
5. Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J, et al. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:17-26.
6. Van Train KF, Berman DS, Garcia EV, et al. Quantitative analysis of stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigrams: a multicenter trial. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:17-25.
7. Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1494-1502.
8. Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, et al. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:609-618.
9. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Rudy TD, et al. Potential utility of rubidium 82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;4:440-449.
10. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350-1358.
11. Nye JA, Esteves FP, Votaw JR. Minimizing artifacts resulting from respiratory and cardiac motion by optimization of the transmission scan in cardiac PET/CT. Med Phys. 2007;34:1901-1906.
12. 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1996;93:463-473.
13. Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:263-272.
14. Eisner RL, Tamas MJ, Cloninger K, et al. Normal SPECT thallium-201 bull's-eye display: gender differences. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:1901-1909.
15. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1899-1905.
16. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:1303-1310.
17. Grover-McKay M, Ratib O, Schwaiger M, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with positron emission tomography and rubidium 82. Am Heart J. 1992;123:646-652.
18. Simone GL, Mullani NA, Page DA, Anderson BAS. Utilization statistics and diagnostic accuracy of a nonhospital-based positron emission tomography center for the detection of coronary artery disease using rubidium-82. Am J Physiol Imaging. 1992;7:203-209.
19. Williams BR, Mullani NA, Jansen DE, Anderson BA. A retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of a community hospital-based PET center for the detection of coronary artery disease using rubidium-82. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1586-1592.
20. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052-1058.