Adenosine stress rubidium-82 PET/computed tomography in patients with known and suspected coronary artery disease

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 674-678

  Esteves, Fabio P ^a   Sanyal, Rupan ^a   Nye, Jonathon A ^a   Santana, Cesar A ^b   Verdes, Liudmila ^b   Raggi, Paolo ^b  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Positron emission tomography computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; RUBIDIUM; RUBIDIUM 82;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCINTISCANNING; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART STRESS; INJURY SEVERITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; AGED; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 55249084656     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: 14735628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328301a614     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Neumann DR, Underwood DA, Simpfendorfer CC. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:1899-1905.
2. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, Popma J, Gacioch GM, Kalus M, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:1303-1310.
3. Grover-McKay M, Ratib O, Schwaiger M, Wohlgelernter D, Araujo L, Nienaber C, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with positron emission tomography and rubidium 82. Am Heart J 1992; 123:646-652.
4. Simone GL, Mullani NA, Page DA, Anderson BA. Utilization statistics and diagnostic accuracy of a nonhospital-based positron emission tomography center for the detection of coronary artery disease using rubidium-82. Am J Physiol Imaging 1992; 7:203-209.
5. Williams BR, Mullani NA, Jansen DE, Anderson BA. A retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of a community hospital-based PET center for the detection of coronary artery disease using rubidium-82. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1586-1592.
6. 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13:24-33.
7. Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M, Navab N, Schwaiger M, Nekolla SG. Artifacts from misaligned CT in cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies: frequency, effects, and potential solutions. J Nucl Med 2007; 48:188-193.
8. Nye JA, Esteves FP, Votaw JR. Minimizing artifacts resulting from respiratory and cardiac motion by optimization of the transmission scan in cardiac PET/CT. Medical Physics. Med Phys 2007; 34:1901-1906.
9. Mawlawi O, Podoloff DA, Kohlmyer S, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Culp RF, Macapinlac H. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:1734-1742.
10. Le Meunier L, Maass-Moreno R, Carrasquillo JA, Dieckmann W, Bacharach SL. PET/CT imaging: effect of respiratory motion on apparent myocardial uptake. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13:821-830.
11. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1052-1058.
12. Bacharach SL, Bax JJ, Case J, Delbeke D, Kurdziel KA, Martin WH, Patterson RE. PET myocardial glucose metabolism and perfusion imaging: Part 1 - Guidelines for data acquisition and patient preparation. J Nucl Cardiol 2003; 10:543-556.
13. Loghin C, Sdringola S, Gould KL. Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:1029-1039.
14. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Guha A, Sdringola S. Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: a definite analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections. J Nucl Med 2007; 48:1112-1121.