Fischer's score criteria correlating with histopathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 421-433

  Girardi, V ^a   Carbognin, G ^a   Camera, L ^a   Tonegutti, M ^b   Bonetti, F ^a   Manfrin, E ^a   Mucelli, R Pozzi ^a  

^a G B ROSSI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Departments of Radiology   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MRI; Fischer's score; Prognostic factors

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; KI 67 ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KI-67 ANTIGEN; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77953263446     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0453-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A et al (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727-1741
2. Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR (2005) Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93:1046-1052
3. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13-30
4. Rankin SC (2000) MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 73:806-818
5. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Canavese G et al (2008) Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007. Radiol Med 113:1085-1095
6. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA et al (1999) Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1323-1329
7. Del Maschio A, Bazzocchi M, Giuseppetti GM et al (2002) Breast MRI: report an a multicentric national trial by the Study Section of Magnetic Resonance and Breast Imaging. Radiol Med 104:262-272
8. Fischer U (2004) Diagnostic criteria. In: Fischer U (ed) Pratical MR Mammography, Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 24-31
9. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M et al (2003) Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol 13:2425-2435
10. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A (1997) Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors. Br J Radiol 70:446-451
11. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL et al (1995) Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadoliniumenhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 197:387-395
12. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U et al (1997) Prognostic value of contrast enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 7:1002-1005
13. Orlacchio A, Bolacchi F, Rotili A et al (2008) MR breast imaging: a comparative analysis of conventional and parallel imaging acquisition. Radiol Med 113:465-476
14. Tuncbilek N, Karakas HM, Okten OO (2005) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 53:199-205
15. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S et al (1997) Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:421-430
16. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
17. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S et al (2005) Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:964-970
18. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L et al (2001) Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:551-557
19. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
20. Ellis CW (1987) Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 311-330
21. Schnitt SJ (2001) Traditional and newer pathologic factor. J Natl Canc Inst Monogr 30:22-26
22. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG et al (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177-182
23. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al (2005) Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 20, 353:1659-1672
24. Burge CN, Chang HR, Apple SK (2006) Do the histologic features and results of breast cancer biomarker studies differ between core biopsy and surgical excision specimen? Breast 15:167-172
25. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087-1092
26. Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356-378
27. Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ et al (2008) Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 9:10-18
28. Montemurro F, Martincich L, Sarotto I et al (2007) Relationship between DCE-MRI morphological and functional features and histopathological characteristics of the breast. Eur Radiol 17:1490-1497