Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 199-205

  Tuncbilek, Nermin ^a   Karakas, Hakki Muammer ^b   Okten, Ozerk Omur ^a  

^a TRAKYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b INONU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Contrast enhancement; Dynamic MRI; Invasive breast cancer; Prognostic factors

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CORRELATION METHODS; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; SURGERY; TUMORS;

DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FAST LOW ANGLE SHOT (FLASH); HISTOPATHOLOGY; METASTASIS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 12444264929     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kacl G.M., Liu P.F., Debatin J.F., Garzoli E., Caduft R.F., Kiestin G.P. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 8:1998;194-200
2. Page D.L., Winfield A.C. The dense mammogram. AJR. 147:1986;487-489
3. Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Hahn D., Schmidt H., Krischke I., Eiermann W., Bassermann R., et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. JCAT. 10:1986;199-204
4. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., Leutner C., Wardelmann E., Gresekev J., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 211:1999;101-110
5. Tuncbilek N., Unlu E., Harakas H.M., Cakir B., Ozyilmaz F. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Breast J. 9:2003;403-408
6. Frouge C., Guinebretiere J.M., Contesso G., Paola R.D., Blery M. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest. Radiol. 29:1994;1043-1049
7. Degani H., Gusis V., Weinstein D., Fields S., Strano S. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat. Med. 3:1997;780-782
8. Weidner N., Semple J.P., Welch W.R., Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N. Eng. J. Med. 324:1991;1-8
9. Fischer U., Kopka L., Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 213:1999;881-888
10. Mussurakis S., Buckley D.L., Horsman A. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumor grade and other histopathological factors. Br. J. Radiol. 70:1997;446-451
11. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., Hashiguchi N., Sakai S., Greseke J., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 200:1996;639-649
12. Lehman C., Holt S., Peacock S., White E., Urban N. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR. 179:2002;15-20
13. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D. High risk screening working group report. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 10:1999;995-1015
14. Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 170:1989;981-986
15. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Dershaw DD. In: Collaboration with Bassler R [Winter PF, Trans.]. Diagnostic breast imaging. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 1997. p. 221-64.
16. Perez CA, Brady LW. Breast cancer. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. Lippincott, Philedelphia; 1987. p. 730-86.
17. Fischer U., Kopka L., Brinck U., Korabiowska M., Schaver A., Grabbe E., et al. Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur. Radiol. 7:1997;1002-1005
18. Boetes C., Barentz J.O., Mus R.D. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced Turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 193:1994;777-781
19. Gasparini G., Toi M., Gion M., Verderio P., Dittadi R., Haratani M., et al. Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor protein in node-negative breast carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89:1997;139-147
20. Kerslake R.W., Carleton P.J., Fox J.N., Imrie M.J., Cook A.M., Read J.R., et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat suppressed spin-echo contrast enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Clin. Radiol. 50:1995;440-454
21. Gribbestad I.S., Nilsen G., Fsojne H., Fogner R., Haugen O.A., Petersen S.B., et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol. 31:1992;833-842
22. Merchant T.E., Obertop H., de Graaf P.W. Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging in breast surgery treatment planning. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 25:1993;257-264
23. Stomper P.C., Winston J.S., Herman S., Klippenstein D.L., Arredondo M.A., Blumenson L.E. Angiogenesis and dynamic MR imaging gadolinium enhancement of malignant and benign breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 45:1997;39-46
24. Friedrich M. MRI of the breast: state of the art. Eur. Radiol. 8:1998;707-725
25. Kinkel K., Helbich T.H., Esserman L.J., Barclay J., Schwerin E.H., Sickles E.A., et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions. AJR. 175:2000;35-43