Biomechanics of the mandible: Part II. Development of a 3-dimensional finite element model to study mandibular functional deformation in subjects treated with dental implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 455-466

  Al Sukhun, Jehad ^a,b,d   Kelleway, John ^c  

^a Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ^*  (United Arab Emirates)

^b Euro Oral Hammaslääkärikeskus   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Jaw deformation; Stress

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34547260080     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Wolff J.Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: Hirschwald, 1892.
2. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law:The bone remodelling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:403-413.
3. Hylander WL. In-vivo bone strain in the mandible of Galago crassicaudatus. Am J Phys Anthrop 1977;46:309-326.
4. Lanyon LE. Functional stress in bone tissue as an objective, and a controlling stimulus for adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech 1987;20:1083-1093.
5. Al-Sukhun J. Modeling of mandibular functional deformation. London: University of London, 2003:273.
6. Hylander WL. Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: A test of competing hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthrop 1984;64:1-46.
7. Hylander WL. The human mandible: Lever or link? Am J Phys Anthrop 1975;43:227-242.
8. Hylander WL. Incisal bite force direction in humans and the functional significance of mammalian mandibular translation. Am J Phys Anthrop 1978;48:1-8.
9. Hylander WL. Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaco fascicularis: An in-vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible. J Morphol 1979;159:253-296.
10. Hylander WL.The functional significance of primate mandibular form. J Morphol 1979;160:223-240.
11. Hylander WL, Ravosa MJ, Ross CF, Johnson KR. Mandibular corpus strain in primates: Further evidence for a functional link between symphyseal fusion and jaw-adductor muscle force. Am J Phys Anthrop 1998;107:257-271.
12. Ralph JP, Caputo AA. Analysis of stress patterns in the human mandible. J Dent Res 54:1975;814-821.
13. Mongini F, Calderale PM, Barberi G. Relationship between structure and the stress pattern in the human mandible. J Dent Res 1979;58:2334-2337.
14. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Ralph JP.The condyle as a stress-distributing component of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:391-401.
15. Gysi A. Studies on the leverage problem of the mandible. Dent Digest 1921;27:74-84.
16. Robinson M.The temporomandibular joint: Theory of reflex controlled non-lever action of the mandible.J Am Dent Assoc 1946;33:1260-1271.
17. Korioth TP, Versulis A. Modelling of the biomechanical behaviour of the jaws and their related structures by finite element analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:90-104.
18. Al-Sukhun J, Kelleway J. Biomechanics of the mandible part I: Measurement of mandibular functional deformation using custom-fabricated displacement transducers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1015-1022.
19. Carter DR, Hayes WC.The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 1977;59:954-962.
20. Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Kontio R. Modelling of orbital deformation using finite element analysis. J R Soc Interface 2006;3:255-262.
21. Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Kontio R. Orbital stress analysis. Part II: Variables affecting the predictive behaviour of a finite element model of a human orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (in press).
22. Huiskes R, Hollister SJ.From structure to process, form to organ: Recent developments of FE analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. J Biomed Eng 1993;115:520-527.
23. Gupta KK, Knoell AC, Grenoble DE. Mathematical modelling and structural analysis of the mandible. Biomat Med Dev Art Org 1973;1:469-479.
24. Knoell AC. A mathematical model of an in-vitro human mandible.J Biomech 1977;10:159-166.
25. Ferré JC, Legoux R, Helary JL, et al. Study of the deformations of the isolated mandible under static constraints by simulation on a physiocomathematical model. Anat Clin 1985;7:183-192.
26. Andersen KL, Mortensen HT, Pedersen EH, Melsen B. Determination of stress levels and profiles in the periodontal ligament by means of an improved three-dimensional finite element model for various types of orthodontic and natural force systems. J Biomed Eng 1999;13:293-303.
27. Hart RT, Hennebel VV, Thongpreda N, Van Buskirk WC, Anderson RC. Modelling the biomechanics of the mandible: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech 1992;25:261-286.
28. Tanne K, Lu Y, Tanaka E, Sakuda M. Biomechanical changes of the mandible from orthopaedic chin cup force studied in a three-dimensional finite element model. Euro J Orthod 1993;15:527-533.
29. Bidez MW, McLoughlin SW, Chen Y, English CE. Finite element analysis of two-abutment Hader bar designs. Implant Dent 1993;2:107-114.
30. van Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, Eugéne T. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;10:51-57.
31. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne S, Felton D. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1997;76:633-640.
32. Tiexeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y. Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:299-303.
33. Vollmer D, Meyer U, Joos U, Vegh A, Piffko J. Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000;28:91-96.
34. Gallas Torreira M, Fernandez JR. A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;5:303-307.
35. Kofod T, Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the mandible and temporo-mandibular joint during vertical ramus elongation by distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2005;4:586-593.
36. Vannier MW, Conroy GC, Marsh JL, Knapp RH. Three-dimensional cranial surface reconstructions using high-resolution computed tomography. Am J Phys Anthrop 1985;67:299-311.
37. Sinclair B, Hannam AG, Lowe AA, Wood WW.Complex contour organization for surface reconstruction. Comput Graphics 1989;13:311-319.
38. Nagahara K, Murata S, Nakamura S, Tsuchiya T. Displacement and stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint during clenching. Angle Orthod 1999;69:372-379.
39. Tanaka E, Rodrigod P, Tanaka M, Kawaguchi A, Shibazaki T, Tanne K. Stress analysis in the TMJ during jaw opening by use of a three-dimensional finite element model based on magnetic resonance images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:421-430.
40. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 1988;21:131-139.
41. Evans FG: Mechanical properties of bone. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1973.
42. Keyak JH, Meagher JM, Skinner HB, Mote CD Jr. Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: A new method. J Biomed Eng 1990;12:389-397.
43. Vannier MW, Conroy GC, Marsh JL, Knapp RH. Three-dimensional cranial surface reconstructions using high-resolution computed tomography. Am J Phys Anthrop 1985;67:299-311.
44. Ashman RB, Cowin SC, van Buskirk WC, Rice JC. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 1984;17:349-361.
45. Beecher RM. Functional significance of the mandibular symphysis. Am J Phys Anthrop 1979;159:117-130.
46. Gates GN, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of mandibular arch width change. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:385-392.
47. Hobkirk JA, Schwab J. Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:319-328.
48. Horiuchi M, Ichikawa T, Noda M, Matsumoto N. Use of interimplant displacement to measure mandibular distortion during jaw movements in humans. Arch Oral Biol 1997;42:185-188.
49. Ueda R.The activity pattern of the inferior head of lateral pterygoid muscle. J Jpn Prosthet Soc 1992;36:94-107.
50. Abdel-Latif H. Functional Mandibular Deformation in Edentulous Subjects Treated with Dental Implants [thesis]. London: University of London, 1996.
51. Beecher RM. Functional significance of the mandibular symphysis. Am J Phys Anthrop 1979;159:117-130.