Public versus private: The conditional effect of state policy and institutional trust on mass opinion

European Sociological Review

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 307-318

  Jakobsen, Tor Georg ^a  

^a TRONDHEIM BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953249919     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: 14682672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcp023     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aalberg, T. (2003). Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinion on Income Distribution. Boston, MA: Brill Leiden.
2. Anderson, C. J. and Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 564-599.
3. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44, 283-299.
4. Bianco, W. T. (1994). Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5. Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23, 393-403.
6. Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: comparative study of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415-427.
7. Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1995). Civil Society. In Lipset, S. M. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Democracy. Volume 1, London: Routledge, pp. 240-242.
10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Peterson and Company.
12. Festinger, L. and Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
13. Gelissen, J. (2000). Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 285-300.
14. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Gosling, P., Denizeau, M. and Oberlé, D. (2006). Denial of responsibility: a new mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 722-733.
16. Hadler, M. (2005). Why do people accept different income rations: a multi-level comparison of thirty countries. Acta Sociologica, 48, 131-154.
17. Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L. and Nelson, D. E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5-16.
18. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Jæger, M. M. (2006). Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review, 22, 157-170.
20. Key, V. O. Jr. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Linos, K. and West, M. (2003). Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution: readdressing the issue of cross-national variation. European Sociological Review, 19, 393-409.
22. Listhaug, O. (2005). Oil wealth dissatisfaction and political trust in Norway: a resource curse? West European Politics, 28, 834-851.
23. Listhaug, O. and Aalberg, T. (1999). Comparative public opinion on distributive justice: a study of equity ideals and attitudes toward current policies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40, 117-140.
24. Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics, 59, 418-451.
25. Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. OECD (2005). Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD.
27. Osgood, C. E. (1960). Cognitive dynamics in the conduct of human affairs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 341-365.
28. Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993). Popular support for the welfare state: a comparison between institutional regimes. Journal of Public Policy, 13, 227-254.
29. Seligman, A. (2002). Civil Society as Idea and Ideal. In Chambers, S. and Kymlicka, W. (Eds.), Alternative Conception of Civil Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 13-33.
30. Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13, 283-304.