-
1
-
-
44949249805
-
Constitutional law - Substantive due process - En banc D.C. Circuit rejects fundamental right to experimental medications. - Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007)(en banc), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1069 (2008)
-
Constitutional law - substantive due process - en banc D.C. Circuit rejects fundamental right to experimental medications. - Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007)(en banc), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1069 (2008). Harv Law Rev 2008; 121: 1685-1692.
-
(2008)
Harv Law Rev
, vol.121
, pp. 1685-1692
-
-
-
2
-
-
50549101888
-
Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: A review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations
-
Brown AP, Wendler DS, Camphausen KA, et al. Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: A review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3987-3994.
-
(2008)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.26
, pp. 3987-3994
-
-
Brown, A.P.1
Wendler, D.S.2
Camphausen, K.A.3
-
3
-
-
16544373261
-
Tissue collection for correlative studies in childhood cancer clinical trials: Ethical considerations and special imperatives
-
Anderson BD, Adamson PC, Weiner SL, et al. Tissue collection for correlative studies in childhood cancer clinical trials: Ethical considerations and special imperatives. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4846-4850.
-
(2004)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.22
, pp. 4846-4850
-
-
Anderson, B.D.1
Adamson, P.C.2
Weiner, S.L.3
-
4
-
-
0020390058
-
The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research
-
Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C. The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982;5:319-329.
-
(1982)
Int J Law Psychiatry
, vol.5
, pp. 319-329
-
-
Appelbaum, P.S.1
Roth, L.H.2
Lidz, C.3
-
5
-
-
33749056147
-
Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research
-
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0269
-
Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, et al. Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4479-4484. (Pubitemid 46630987)
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.24
, Issue.27
, pp. 4479-4484
-
-
Agrawal, M.1
Grady, C.2
Fairclough, D.L.3
Meropol, N.J.4
Maynard, K.5
Emanuel, E.J.6
-
6
-
-
0032009828
-
Phase I trials in cancer patients: Participants' perceptions
-
Hutchison C. Phase I trials in cancer patients: Participants' perceptions. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 1998;7:15-22. (Pubitemid 128657860)
-
(1998)
European Journal of Cancer Care
, vol.7
, Issue.1
, pp. 15-22
-
-
Hutchison, C.1
-
7
-
-
0034220056
-
Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding
-
Miller M. Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Cent Rep 2000;30:34-43.
-
(2000)
Hastings Cent Rep
, vol.30
, pp. 34-43
-
-
Miller, M.1
-
8
-
-
0038339691
-
The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials
-
DOI 10.1002/cncr.11483
-
Weinfurt KP, Castel LD, Li Y, et al. The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer 2003;98:166-175. (Pubitemid 36741139)
-
(2003)
Cancer
, vol.98
, Issue.1
, pp. 166-175
-
-
Weinfurt, K.P.1
Castel, L.D.2
Li, Y.3
Sulmasy, D.P.4
Balshem, A.M.5
Benson III, A.B.6
Burnett, C.B.7
Gaskin, D.J.8
Marshall, J.L.9
Slater, E.F.10
Schulman, K.A.11
Meropol, N.J.12
-
9
-
-
0242383541
-
Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: Linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutics misconception
-
DOI 10.1023/A:1026072409595
-
Weinfurt KP, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, et al. Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: Linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth 2003;24:329-344. (Pubitemid 37336581)
-
(2003)
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
, vol.24
, Issue.4
, pp. 329-344
-
-
Weinfurt, K.P.1
Sulmasy, D.P.2
Schulman, K.A.3
Meropol, N.J.4
-
10
-
-
33750614686
-
Impact and perceptions of mandatory tumor biopsies for correlative studies in clinical trials of novel anticancer agents
-
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4496
-
Agulnik M, Oza AM, Pond GR, et al. Impact and perceptions of mandatory tumor biopsies for correlative studies in clinical trials of novel anticancer agents. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4801-4807. (Pubitemid 46655611)
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.24
, Issue.30
, pp. 4801-4807
-
-
Agulnik, M.1
Oza, A.M.2
Pond, G.R.3
Siu, L.L.4
-
11
-
-
0037180808
-
Descriptions of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase 1 oncology trials
-
DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa021182
-
Horng S, Emanuel EJ, Wilfond B, et al. Descriptions of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase 1 oncology trials. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2134-2140. (Pubitemid 36015126)
-
(2002)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.347
, Issue.26
, pp. 2134-2140
-
-
Horng, S.1
Emanuel, E.J.2
Wilfond, B.3
Rackoff, J.4
Martz, K.5
Grady, C.6
-
12
-
-
33749020013
-
The role of altruism in parental decision-making for childhood cancer clinical trials - Further questions to explore
-
Jacoby L. The role of altruism in parental decision-making for childhood cancer clinical trials - Further questions to explore. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:52.
-
(2006)
Am J Bioeth
, vol.6
, pp. 52
-
-
Jacoby, L.1
-
13
-
-
33749012820
-
Altruistic discourse and therapeutic misconception in research informed consent
-
DOI 10.1080/15265160600862924, PII H42155653K242434
-
Joffe S. Altruistic discourse and therapeutic misconception in research informed consent. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:53-54. (Pubitemid 44451639)
-
(2006)
American Journal of Bioethics
, vol.6
, Issue.5
, pp. 53-54
-
-
Joffe, S.1
-
14
-
-
33749038900
-
Altruistic motives reconsidered
-
Ladd RE, Forman E. Altruistic motives reconsidered. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:55-56.
-
(2006)
Am J Bioeth
, vol.6
, pp. 55-56
-
-
Ladd, R.E.1
Forman, E.2
-
15
-
-
33748997946
-
Altruistic discourse in the informed consent process for childhood cancer clinical trials
-
DOI 10.1080/15265160600862395, PII N47150325108LL13
-
Simon C, Eder M, Kodish E, et al. Altruistic discourse in the informed consent process for childhood cancer clinical trials. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:40-47. (Pubitemid 44451634)
-
(2006)
American Journal of Bioethics
, vol.6
, Issue.5
, pp. 40-47
-
-
Simon, C.1
Eder, M.2
Kodish, E.3
Siminoff, L.4
-
16
-
-
33749014932
-
Can children be altruistic research subjects?
-
Spriggs M. Can children be altruistic research subjects? Am J Bioeth 2006;6:49-50.
-
(2006)
Am J Bioeth
, vol.6
, pp. 49-50
-
-
Spriggs, M.1
-
17
-
-
33749000585
-
Altruism and pediatric oncology trials: It does not tip the decision-making scales
-
DOI 10.1080/15265160600862429, PII T8L4L1LM25347MT2
-
Wasson K. Altruism and pediatric oncology trials: It does not tip the decision-making scales. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:48. (Pubitemid 44451635)
-
(2006)
American Journal of Bioethics
, vol.6
, Issue.5
, pp. 48
-
-
Wasson, K.1
-
18
-
-
34547711581
-
Phase I participants' views of quality of life and trial participation burdens
-
DOI 10.1007/s00520-007-0216-0
-
Cohen MZ, Slomka J, Pentz RD, et al. Phase I participants' views of quality of life and trial participation burdens. Support Care Cancer 2007;15:885-890. (Pubitemid 47387509)
-
(2007)
Supportive Care in Cancer
, vol.15
, Issue.7
, pp. 885-890
-
-
Cohen, M.Z.1
Slomka, J.2
Pentz, R.D.3
Flamm, A.L.4
Gold, D.5
Herbst, R.S.6
Abbruzzese, J.L.7
|