Clonal evaluation for fusiform rust disease resistance: Effects of pathogen virulence and disease escape

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1042-1050

  Kayihan, Gögçe C ^a   Dana Nelson, C ^b   Huber, Dudley A ^a   Amerson, Henry V ^c   White, Timothy L ^a   Davis, John M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-SEGREGATION; ESCAPE RATE; FUSIFORM RUST; GENETIC VARIATION; HERITABILITY ESTIMATES; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; INOCULA; LOW COMPLEXITY; LOW FREQUENCY; PATHOTYPE; PINUS TAEDA; RESISTANCE MECHANISMS; SPECIFIC RESISTANCES;

GENES;

CLONE; CONIFEROUS TREE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FUNGAL DISEASE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; HERITABILITY; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; PATHOGEN; PHENOTYPE; RAMET; VIRULENCE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 77953177926     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X10-045     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amerson, H.V., Frampton, L.J., Jr., Mott, R., and Spaine, P.C. 1988. Tissue culture of conifers using loblolly pine as a model. In Genetic manipulation of woody plants. Edited by J. Hanover and D. Keathley. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 117-137.
2. Baltunis, B.S., Huber, D.A., White, T.L., Goldfarb, B., and Stelzer, H.E. 2005. Genetic effects of rooting loblolly pine stem cuttings from a partial diallel mating design. Can. J. For. Res. 35(5): 1098-1108. doi:10.1139/x05-038.
3. Barber, J.C., Dorman, K.W., and Bauer, E. 1957. Slash pine progeny tests indicate genetic variation in resistance to rust. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SE-104.
4. Bridgwater, F., Kubisiak, T., Byram, T., and McKeand, S. 2005. Risk assessment with current deployment strategies for fusiform rust-resistant loblolly and slash pines. South. J. Appl. For. 29(2): 80-87.
5. Dhakal, L.P., White, T.L., and Hodge, G.R. 1996. Realized genetic gains from slash pine tree improvement. Silvae Genet. 45(4): 190-197.
6. Falconer, D.S., and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman and Co., New York.
7. Frampton, L.J., Jr. 1994. Field performance comparison between vegetative propagules and seedlings of loblolly and slash pines. In Proceedings of the 1992 SRIEG Biennial Symposium on Forest Genetics. Edited by G.S. Foster and A.M. Diner. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-108. pp. 115-121.
8. Frampton, J., Li, B., and Goldfarb, B. 2000. Early field growth of loblolly pine rooted cuttings and seedlings. South. J. Appl. For. 24(2): 98-105.
9. González-Martínez, S.C., Wheeler, N.C., Ersoz, E., Nelson, C.D., and Neale, D.B. 2007. Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood property traits. Genetics, 175(1): 399-409. doi:10.1534/ genetics.106.061127. PMID:17110498.
10. González-Martínez, S.C., Huber, D., Ersoz, E., Davis, J.M., and Neale, D.B. 2008. Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. II. Carbon isotope discrimination. Heredity, 101(1): 19-26. doi:10. 1038/hdy.2008.21. PMID:18478029.
11. Griggs, M.M., and Walkinshaw, C.H. 1982. Diallel analysis of genetic resistance to Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme in slash pine. Phytopathology, 72(7): 816-818. doi:10.1094/Phyto-72-816.
12. Henderson, C.R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush, 29 July 1972, Blacksburg, Virginia. American Society of Animal Science, Chicago, Ill., USA. pp. 10-41.
13. Huber, D.A. 1993. Optimal mating designs and optimal techniques for analysis of quantitative traits in forest genetics. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla, USA.
14. Isik, F., Amerson, H.V., Whetten, R.W., Garcia, S.A., Li, B., and McKeand, S.E. 2008. Resistance of Pinus taeda families under artificial inoculations with diverse fusiform rust pathogen populations and comparison with field trials. Can. J. For. Res. 38(10): 2687-2696. doi:10.1139/X08-111.
15. Kayihan, G.C., Huber, D.A., Morse, A.M., White, T.L., and Davis, J.M. 2005. Genetic dissection of fusiform rust and pitch canker disease traits in loblolly pine. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110(5): 948-958. doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1915-2. PMID:15700146.
16. Kinloch, B.B., Jr., and Walkinshaw, C.H. 1991. Resistance to fusiform rust in southern pines: How is it inherited? In Rusts of Pine: Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Pine Working Party Conference, 18-22 September 1989, Banff, Canada. Can. NW Reg. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-317. pp. 219-228.
17. Knighten, J.L., Young, C.H., McCartney, T.C., and Anderson, R.L. 1988. Resistance screening center procedures manual: a step-by- step guide used in the operational screening of southern pines for resistance to fusiform rust. USDA For. Serv. Rep. 83-1-18, Asheville, N.C., USA.
18. Kubisiak, T.L., Roberds, J.H., Spaine, P.C., and Doudrick, R.L. 2004. Microsatellite DNA suggests regional structure in the fusi- form rust fungus Cronartium quercuum f. sp fusiforme. Heredity, 92(1): 41-50. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800352. PMID: 13130304.
19. Kubisiak, T.L., Amerson, H.V., and Nelson, C.D. 2005. Genetic interaction of the fusiform rust fungus with resistance gene fr1 in loblolly pine. Phytopathology, 95(4): 376-380. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-95-0376. PMID:18943039.
20. Kuhlman, E.G., and Matthews, F.R. 1993. Variation in virulence among single-aeciospore isolates from single-gall isolates of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. Can. J. For. Res. 23(1): 67-71. doi:10.1139/x93-011.
21. Kuhlman, E.G., and Powers, H.R. 1988. Resistance responses in half-sib loblolly-pine progenies after inoculation with Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. Phytopathology, 78(4): 484-487. doi:10.1094/Phyto-78-484.
22. Kuhlman, E.G., Amerson, H.V., Jordan, A.P., and Pepper, W.D. 1997. Inoculum density and expression of major gene resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine. Plant Dis. 81(6): 597-600. doi:10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.6.597.
23. Li, H., Amerson, H., and Li, B. 2006. Genetic models of host- pathogen gene interaction based on inoculation of loblolly pine seedlings with the fusiform rust fungus. New For. 31(2): 245-252.
24. McKeand, S.E., and Frampton, L.J., Jr. 1984. Performance of tissue culture plantlets of loblolly pine in vivo. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recent Advances in Forest Biotechnology, 10-13 June 1984, Traverse City, Michigan. Edited by J. Hanover, D. Karnosky, and D. Keathley. Michigan Biotechnol-ogy Institute, East Lansing, Mich., USA. pp. 82-91.
25. McKeand, S.E., Li, B., and Amerson, H.V. 1999. Genetic variation in fusiform rust resistance in loblolly pine across a wide geographic range. Silvae Genet. 48(5): 255-260.
26. McKeand, S.E., Mullin, T., Byram, T., and White, T. 2003a. Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the South. J. For. 101(3): 32-37.
27. McKeand, S.E., Amerson, H.V., Li, B., and Mullin, T.J. 2003b. Fa- milies of loblolly pine that are the most stable for resistance to fusiform rust are the least predictable. Can. J. For. Res. 33(7): 1335-1339. doi:10.1139/x03-050.
28. Morse, A.M., Peterson, D.G., Islam-Faridi, M.N., Smith, K.E., Magbanua, Z., Garcia, S.A., Kubisiak, T.L., Amerson, H.V., Carlson, J.E., Nelson, C.D., Davis, J.M., and Batzer, M.A. 2009. Evolution of genome size and complexity in Pinus. PLoS One, 4(2): e4332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004332. PMID: 19194510.
29. Myburg, H., Morse, A.M., Amerson, H.V., Kubisiak, T.L., Huber, D., Osborne, J.A., Garcia, S.A., Nelson, C.D., Davis, J.M., Covert, S.F., and van Zyl, L.M. 2006. Differential gene expression in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L) challenged with the fusiform rust fungus, Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 68(1-3): 79-91. doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.07.002.
30. Nance, W.L., Tuskan, G.A., Nelson, C.D., and Doudrick, R.L. 1992. Potential applications of molecular markers for genetic analysis of host-pathogen systems in forest trees. Can. J. For. Res. 22(7): 1036-1043. doi:10.1139/x92-138.
31. Nelson, C.D., Kubisiak, T.L., and Amerson, H.V. 2010. Unraveling and managing fusiform rust disease: a model approach for coevolved forest tree pathosystems. For. Pathol. 40(1): 64-72.
32. Patterson, H., and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter-block in- formation when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58(3): 545-554. doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.545.
33. Poland, J.A., Balint-Kurti, P.J., Wisser, R.J., Pratt, R.C., and Nelson, R.J. 2009. Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 14(1): 21-29. doi:10.1016/j.tplants. 2008.10.006.
34. Powers, H.R., Jr. 1980. Pathogenic variation among single-aecios- pore isolates of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. For. Sci. 26(2): 280-282.
35. Schmidt, R.A., Powers, H.R., Jr., and Snow, G.A. 1981. Applica- tion of genetic disease resistance for the control of fusiform rust in intensively managed southern pine. Phytopathology, 71(9): 993-997. doi:10.1094/Phyto-71-993.
36. Snow, G.A., and Kais, A.G. 1970. Pathogenic variability in isolates of Cronartium fusiforme from five southern states. Phytopathol- ogy, 60(12): 1730-1731. doi:10.1094/Phyto-60-1730.
37. Thumma, B.R., Nolan, M.F., Evans, R., and Moran, G.F. 2005. Polymorphisms in cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) are associated with variation in microfibril angle in Eucalyptus spp. Genetics, 171(3): 1257-1265. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.042028. PMID:16085705.
38. Wilcox, P.L., Amerson, H.V., Kuhlman, E.G., Liu, B.H., O'Malley, D.M., and Sederoff, R.R. 1996. Detection of a major gene for resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine by genomic mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93(9): 3859-3864. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.3859. PMID:8632980.
39. Yamada, Y. 1962. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Jap. J. Genet. 37(6): 498-509. doi:10.1266/jjg.37.498.