Risk assessment with current deployment strategies for fusiform rust-resistant loblolly and slash pines

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 80-87

  Bridgwater, Floyd ^a   Kubisiak, Tom ^a   Byram, Tom ^b   McKeand, Steve ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b Texas Forest Service   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cronartium quercuum (Berk.) Miyabe ex Shirai f. sp. fusiforme; Deployment strategy; Fusarium subglutinans f. sp. pini; Pinus elliottii; Pinus taeda; Risk management

Indexed keywords

CLONING; CROPS; FORESTRY; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEED; STRESSES;

DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY; FUSARIUM SUBGLUTINANS; FUSIFORME; MOLECULAR GENETIC;

SOFTWOODS;

CLONES; CRONARTIUM; FARM CROPS; FOREST GENETICS; FORESTRY; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOTYPES; PATHOGENS; PINUS CARIBAEA; PINUS ELLIOTTII; PINUS TAEDA; PLANTATIONS; SEED ORCHARDS; STRESSES; VARIETIES;

CRONARTIUM QUERCUUM; FUSARIUM SUBGLUTINANS; GIBBERELLA CIRCINATA; PINUS ELLIOTTII; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 25444449497     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/29.2.80     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Amerson, H.V. 2002. Defining major genes for resistance in the pine-fusiform forest pathosystem. Fusiform Rust Project Annual Report #6, Forestry Dept., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 24 pp.
2. Anderson, R.L., C.H. Young, N.D. Cost, J.S. Vissage, D.M. May, and E.K. Yockey. 1997. Monitoring incidence of fusiform rust in the south and change over time. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region Forest Health Protection Rpt. R8-PR 30. 14 p.
3. Bishir, J., and J. Roberds. 1995. Analysis of failure time in clonally propagated plant populations. Mathematical Biosciences. 125: 109-125.
4. Bramlett, D.L. 1997. Genetic gain from mass controlled pollination and topworking. J. For. 95(3):15-19.
5. Bridgwater, F.E., D.L. Bramlett, T.D. Byram, and W.J. Lowe. 1998. Controlled mass pollination in loblolly pine to increase genetic gains. For. Chronicle. 74(2):185-189.
6. Bridgwater, F.E., and R.W. Stonecypher. 1978. Genotype x environment interaction: Implications in tree breeding programs. P. 46-63 in Proc. fifth N. Am. for. biol. workshop, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
7. Carson, S.D., and M.J. Carson. 1989. Breeding for resistance in forest trees - A quantitative genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27: 373-395.
8. Dieters, M.J., G.R. Hodge, and T.L. White. 1996. Genetic parameter estimates for resistance to rust (Cronartium quercuum) infection from full-sib tests of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), modeled as functions of rust resistance. Silvae Genetica. 45(4):235-242.
9. Duzan, H.W., and C.G. Williams. 1988. Matching loblolly pine families to regeneration sites. South. J. Appl. For. 12(3):166-169.
10. Foster, G.S. 1993. Selection and breeding for extreme genotypes. P. 65-81 in Proc. 24th Meeting Can. Tree Improvement Assoc., August 5-19, 1993, Fredricton, New Brunswick, Canada, Part 2.
11. Foster, G.S., and R.L. Anderson. 1989. Indirect selection and clonal propagation of loblolly pine seedlings enhance resistance to fusiform rust. Can. J. For. Res. 19:534-537.
12. Frampton, J., B. Li, and B. Goldfarb. 2000. Early field growth of loblolly pine rooted cuttings and seedlings. South. J. Appl. For. 24(2):98-105.
13. Froelich, R.C., and G.A. Snow. 1986. Predicting site hazard to fusiform rust. For. Sci. 32(1):21-35.
14. Gladstone, W.T. 1981. Customize or compromise (an alternative for loblolly) P. 200-204 in Proc. 16th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Blacksburg, VA.
15. Goldfarb, B., R.J. Weir, B. Li, S. Surles, R. Murthy, B. Rowe, and J. Frampton. 1997. Progress toward operational deployment of loblolly and slash pine rooted cuttings. P. 361-362 in 24th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Nat. Tech. Info. Serv., Springfield, VA. 442 pp.
16. Griggs, M.M., and R.A. Schmidt. 1977. Increase and spread of fusiform rust. P. 32-38 in Proc. Management of Fusiform Rust in Southern Pines. Dinus, R.J., and R.A. Schmidt (eds.). Dec. 7 and 8, 1976, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 163 pp.
17. Hamelin, R.C., R.L. Doudrick, and W.L. Nance. 1994. Genetic diversity in Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme on loblolly pines in southern U.S. Current Genet. 26:359-363.
18. Hodge, G.R., R.A. Schmidt, and T.L. White. 1990. Substantial realized gains from mass selection of fusiform rust-free trees in highly infected stands of slash pine. South. J. Appl. For. 14(2):143-146.
19. Huhn, M. 1986. Multiclonal mixtures and numbers of clones. IL Number of clones and yield stability (deterministic approach with competition). Silvae Genetica. 41:205-213.
20. Knighten, J.L., C.H. Young, T.C. McCartney, and R.L. Anderson. 1988. Resistance screening center procedures manual: A step-by-step guide used in the operational screening of southern pines for resistance to fusiform rust. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Resistance Screening Center, Asheville, NC. 13 p.
21. Kubisiak, T.L., J.H. Roberds, P.C. Spaine, and R.L. Doudrick. 2004. Microsatellite DNA suggests regional structure in the fusiform rust fungus Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. Heredity. 92:41-50.
22. Kuhlman, E.G. 1989. Virulent isolates of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme may identify different resistant genes. P. 347-353 in Proc. 20th S. For. Tree Impr. Conf., June 26-30, 1989, Charleston, SC. 463 pp.
23. Kuhlman, E.G.. 1992. Interaction of virulent single-gall isolates of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme and resistant families of loblolly pine. For. Sci. 38:641-651.
24. Kuhlman, E.G., H.V. Amerson, A.P. Jordan, and W.D. Pepper. 1997. Inoculum density and expression of major gene resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine. Plant Disease. 81(6):597-600.
25. Kuhlman, E.G., and F.R. Matthews. 1993. Variation in virulence among single-aeciospore isolates from single-gall isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Can. J. For. Res. 23:67-71.
26. Lambeth, C. 2000. Realized genetic gains for first generation improved loblolly pine in 45 tests in coastal North Carolina. South. J. Appl. For. 24(3):140-144.
27. Libby, W.J. 1982. What is a safe number of clones per plantation? P. 342-360 in Resistance to disease and pests in forest trees, Proc. 3rd International Workshop on the Genetics of host-parasite interactions in forestry, Heybroed, H.M. et al. (eds.). Waheningen, The Netherlands.
28. Littlefield, L.J., and M.C. Heath 1979. Ultrastructure of rust fungi. Academic Press, New York, NY.
29. Mackay, J., M. Becwar, Y.-S. Park, C. Perfetti, J. Cordero, G. PULLMAN, and L. Lockart. 2001. Genetics of somatic embryogenesis in loblolly pine. P. 40-47 in 26th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Nat. Tech. Info. Serv., Springfield, VA. 236 pp.
30. McDonald, B.A., and C. Linde. 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:349-379.
31. McKeand, S.E., R.P. Crook, and H.L. Allen. 1997. Genotypic stability effects on predicted family responses to silvicultural treatments in loblolly pine. South. J. Appl. For. 21:84-89.
32. McKeand, S.E., H.V. Amerson, B. Li, and T.J. Mullin. 2003a. Families of loblolly pine that are most stable for resistance to fusiform rust are the least predictable. Can. J. For. Res. 33:1335-1339.
33. McKeand, S., T. Mullin, T. Byram, and T. White. 2003b. Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pine in the South. J. For. 101(3):32 37.
34. Phelps, W.R. 1973. Fusiform rust incidence survey 1971-73. U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Southeast Area. 31 p.
35. Powers, H.R. Jr. 1980. Pathogenic variation among single aeciospore isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. For. Sci. 26(2): 280-282.
36. Powers, H.R. Jr. 1985. Response of sixteen loblolly pine families to four isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. P. 89-96 in Proc. IUFRO, Rusts of Hard Pines Working Party Conf. (S2.06-10), Sept. 1984, Athens, GA. Barrows-Broaddus, J. and H. R. Powers. (eds.). Georgia Center for Continuing Education, Univ. of GA, Athens, GA.
37. Powers, H.T., F.R. Matthews, and L.D. Dwinell. 1977. Evaluation of pathogenetic variability of Cronartium fusiforme on loblolly pine in the southern USA. Phytopathology. 67:1403-1407.
38. Powers, H.R., F.R. Mathews, and L.D. Dwinell. 1978. The potential for increased virulence of Cronartium fusiforme on resistant loblolly pine. Phytopathology. 68:808-810.
39. Pye, J.M., J.E. Wagner, T.P. Holmes, and F.W. Cubbage. 1997. Positive returns from investment in fusiform rust research. Res. Pap. SRS-4. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 55 p.
40. Rockwood, D.L., G.M. Blakeslee, G.A. Lowerts, E.M. Underhill, and S.W. Oak. 1988. Genetic strategies for reducing pitch canker incidence in slash pine. South. J. Appl. For. 12(1):28-32.
41. Schmidtling, R., and V. Hipkins. 2001. Factors contributing to genetic variation in ice damage susceptibility in shortleaf pine. P. 60-62 in 26th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Nat. Tech. Info. Serv., Springfield, VA. 236 pp.
42. Sheffield, R.M., and J.G. Dickson. 1998. The South's forestland - on the hot seat to provide more. P. 316-331 in Transactions of the 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources conference; 1998 March 20-25; Orlando, FL. Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute.
43. Snow, G.A., R.J. Dinus, and A.G. Kals. 1975. Variation in pathogenicity of diverse sources of Cronartium fusiforme on selected slash pine families. Phytopathology. 65:170-175.
44. Snow, G.A., R.J. Dinus, and C.H. Walkinshaw. 1976. Increase in virulence of Cronartium fusiforme on resistant slash pine. Phytopathology. 66:511-513.
45. Snow, G.A., and M.M. Griggs. 1980. Relative virulence of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme from seven resistant families of slash pine. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 19:13-16.
46. Snow, G.A., and A.G. Kais. 1970. Pathogenetic variability in isolates of Cronartium fusiforme from five southern states. Phytopathology. 60:1730-1731.
47. Stelzer, H.E., and B. Goldfarb. 1997. Implementing clonal forestry in the southeastern United States: SRIEG satellite workshop summary remarks. Can. J. For. Res. 27:442 446.
48. Stelzer, H.E., R.L. Doudrick, T.L. Kubisiak, and C.D. Nelson. 1999. Prescreening slash pine and Cronartium pedigrees for evaluation of complementary gene action in fusiform rust disease. Plant Disease. 83(4):385-389.
49. Strom, B.L., R.A. Goyer, L.L. Ingram, Jr., G.D.L. Boyd, and L.H. Lott. 2002. Oleoresin characteristics of progeny of loblolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle. For. Ecol. and Manage. 158:169-178.
50. Van Buljtenen, J.P. 1982. A population genetic model of the alternate host system of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. For. Sci. 28(4): 745-752.
51. Walkinshaw, C.H., and J.P. Barnerr. 1995. Tolerance of loblolly pines to fusiform rust. South. J. Appl. For. 19(2):60-64.
52. Walkinshaw, C.H., and C.F. Bey. 1981. Reaction of field resistant slash pines to selected isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Phytopathology. 71:1090-1092.
53. Wilcox, P.L., H.V. Amerson, E.G. Kuhlman, B-H Liu, D.M. O'Malley, and R.R. Sederoff. 1996. Detection of a major gene for resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine by genomic mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93:3859-3864.