Improvement of visual search after audiovisual exploration training in hemianopic patients

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 666-673

  Keller, Ingo ^a   Lefin Rank, Gudrun ^a  

^a Schoen Clinic   (Germany)

Author keywords

audiovisual stimulation; rehabilitation; visual field defect

Indexed keywords

ADL DISABILITY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; READING; STROKE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR MOTILITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE;

EID: 77953175722     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968310372774     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Zihl J. Cerebral disturbances of elementary visual function. In: Brown JW, ed. Neuropsychology of Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989: 35-58.
2. Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn MJ, et al. Natural history of homonymous hemianopia. Neurology. 2006 ; 66: 901-905.
3. Gray CS, French JM, Bates D., et al. Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous hemianopia with adverse prognosis. Age Ageing. 1989 ; 18: 419-421.
4. Schuett S. The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 ; 5: 427-437.
5. Kerkhoff G., Marquardt C. Visually based reading disorders after brain damage: standardised assessment and treatment with READ. Nervenarzt. 2009 ; 80: 1424-1439.
6. Marshall RS, Ferrera JJ, Barnes A., et al. Brain activity associated with stimulation therapy of the visual borderzone in hemianopic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 136-144.
7. Schmielau F., Wong EK Recovery of visual fields in brainlesioned patients by reaction perimetry treatment. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007 ; 16: 4-31.
8. Jobke S., Kasten E., Sabel BA Vision restoration through extrastriate stimulation in patients with visual field defects: a double-blind randomized study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 23: 246-255.
9. Horton JC Disappointing results from Nova Visionĝs visual restoration therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 ; 89: 1-2.
10. Schreiber A., Vonthein R., Reinhard J., Trauzettel-Klosinski S., Connert C., Schiefer U. Effect of visual restitution training on absolute homonymous scotomas. Neurology. 2006 ; 67: 143-145.
11. Kerkhoff G., Müninger U., Meier EK Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol. 1994 ; 51: 474-481.
12. Zihl J. Rehabilitation of Visual Disorders After Brain Injury. East Sussex, UK: Psychological Press; 2000.
13. Nelles G., Esser J., Eckstein A., et al. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2001 ; 306: 189-192.
14. Pambakian AL, Mannan SK, Hodgson TL, Kennard C. Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 ; 75: 1443-1448.
15. Roth T., Sokolov AN, Messias A., et al. Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: a randomized controlled study. Neurology. 2009 ; 72: 324-331.
16. Zihl J. Visual scanning behaviour in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1995 ; 33: 287-303.
17. Bolognini N., Rasi F., Coccia M., Làdavas E. Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation. Brain. 2005 ; 128: 2830-2842.
18. Stein BE Neural mechanism for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 123: 124-135.
19. Passamonti C., Bertini C., Làdavas E. Audio-visual stimulation improves oculomotor patterns in patients with hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 2009 ; 47: 546-555.
20. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Statements from the Vancouver Group. BMJ. 1991 ; 302: 1194.
21. Kerkhoff G., Münssinger U., Meier EK Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol. 1994 ; 51: 474-481.
22. Zihl J. Visual scanning behaviour in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1995 ; 33: 287-303.
23. De Luca M., Spinelli D., Zoccolotti P. Eye movement patterns in reading as a function of visual field defects and contrast sensitivity loss. Cortex. 1996 ; 32: 491-502.
24. Trauzettel-Klosinski S., Rheinard J. The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 ; 39: 2177-2186.
25. Leff AP, Scott SK, Rothwell JC, et al. The planning and guiding of reading saccades: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex. 2001 ; 11: 918-923.
26. Stein BE, Meredith MA, eds. Merging of Sense. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 1993.
27. Corneil BD, Van Wanrooij M., Munoz D., et al. Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in complex scene. J Neurophysiol. 2002 ; 88: 438-454.
28. Williams C., Azzopardi P., Cowey A. Nasal and temporal retinal ganglioncells projecting to the midbrain: implications for "blindsight. " Neuroscience. 1995 ; 65: 577-586.
29. Lincoln NB, Bowen, A. The need for randomised treatment studies in neglect research. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006 ; 24: 401-408.
30. Zangemeister WH, Oechsner U., Freksa C. Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemifield defects indicates high level control of human scanpath. Optom Vis Sci. 1995 ; 72: 467-477.
31. Pambakian AL, Wooding DS, Patel N., et al. Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 ; 69: 751-759.
32. Martin T., Riley ME, Kelly KN, et al. Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task. Vision Res. 2007 ; 47: 3434-3446.