Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation

Brain

Volumn 128, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2830-2842

  Bolognini, Nadia ^a,b   Rasi, Fabrizio ^b,c   Coccia, Michela ^d   Làdavas, Elisabetta ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b CsrNC Centro di Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive   (Italy)

^c BUFALINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d OSPEDALI RIUNITI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Multisensory integration; Oculomotor compensation; Rehabilitation; Visual field defect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 28544436750     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh656     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arndt P, Colonius H. Two stages in crossmodal saccadic integration: evidence from a visual-auditory focused attention task. Exp Brain Res 2003; 150: 417-26.
2. Bolognini N, Frassinetti F, Làdavas E. Acoustical vision of below threshold stimuli: Interaction among spatially converging stimuli. Exp Brain Res 2005a; 160: 273-82.
3. Bolognini N, Rasi F, Làdavas E. Visual localization of sounds. Neuropsychologia 2005b; 43: 1655-61.
4. Calvert G, Spence C, Stein BE, editors. The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2004.
5. Chedru F, Leblanc M, Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex 1973; 9: 94-111.
6. Colonius H, Arndt P. A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies. Percept Psychophys 2001; 63: 126-47.
7. Corneil BD, Van Wanrooij M, Munoz D, Van Opstal J. Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in complex scene. J Neuro-physiol 2002; 88: 438-54.
8. Damasio H, Damasio, AR, editors. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
9. Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Làdavas E. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal audio-visual interaction. Exp Brain Res 2002a; 147: 332-43.
10. Frassinetti F, Pavani F, Làdavas E. Acoustical vision of neglected stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs in neglect patients. J Cogn Neurosci 2002b; 14: 62-9.
11. Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Bottari D, Bonora A, Làdavas E. Audio-visual integration in patients with visual deficit. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 1442-52.
12. Hairston WD, Laurienti PJ, Mishra G, Burdette JH, Wallance MT. Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia. Exp Brain Res 2003; 152: 404-8.
13. Harrington LK, Peck CK. Spatial disparity affects visual-auditory interactions in human sensorimotor processing. Exp Brain Res 1998; 122: 247-52.
14. Hildebrandt H, Giesselmann H, Sachsenheimer W. Visual search and visual target detection in patients with infarctions of the left or right posterior or the right middle brain artery. J Clin Exp Neurolpsychol 1999; 21: 94-107.
15. Hughes HC, Nelson MD, Aronchick DM. Spatial characteristics of visual-auditory summation in human saccades. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3955-63.
16. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Statements from the Vancouver Group. BMJ 1991; 302: 1194.
17. Kerkhoff G, Münssinger U, Haaf E, Eberle-Strauss G, Stögerer E. Rehabilitation of homonymous scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage to the visual system: saccadic compensation training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1992; 4: 245-54.
18. Kerkhoff G, Munbinger U, Meier EK. Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 474-81.
19. Kerkhoff G. Restorative and compensatory therapy approaches in célébrai blindness - a review. [Review]. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1999; 1: 255-71.
20. Kerkhoff G. Neurovisual rehabilitation: recent developments and future directions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 691-706.
21. Krauzlis RJ, Liston D, Carello CD. Target selection and the superior colliculus: goals, choices and hypotheses. Vision Res. 2004; 4: 1445-51.
22. Làdavas E, Menghini G, Umiltà C. A rehabilitation study of hemispatial neglect. Cogn Neuropsychol 1994; 15: 79-95.
23. Morris RK, Rayner K, Pollatsek A. Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990; 16: 268-81.
24. Nelles G, Esser J, Eckstein A, Tiede A, Gerhard H, Diener HC. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett 2001; 306: 189-92.
25. Pambakian AL, Kennard C. Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia? Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 81: 324-8.
26. Pambakian AL, Wooding DS, Patel N, Morland AB, Kennard C, Mannan, SK. Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 751-9.
27. Pambakian AL, Mannan SK, Hodgson TL, Kennard C. Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1443-8.
28. Pizzamiglio L, Antonucci G, Judica A, Montenero P, Razzano C, Zoccolotti P. Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorders in chronic patients with unilateral brain damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsycho. 1992; 14: 901-23.
29. Poppelreuter W. Disturbances of lower and higher visual capacities caused by occipital damage. Transl. Zihl J, Weiskrantz L. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Clarendon); 1971/1990.
30. Schendel K, Robertson LC. Reaching out to see: arm position can attenuate human visual loss. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16: 935-43.
31. Spence C, Driver J, editors. Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
32. Stein BE. Neural mechanism for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors. Exp Brain Res 1998; 123: 124-35.
33. Stein BE, Meredith MA, editors. Merging of sense. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.
34. Stein BE, Jiang, W, Standford TR. Multisensory integration in single neurons of the midbrain. In: Calvert G, Spence C, Stein BE, editors. The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
35. Stoerig P, Cowey A. Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain 1997; 120: 535-59.
36. Sumner P, Adamjee T, Mollon JD. Signals invisible to the colliculus and magnocellular pathway can be capture visual attention. Current Biol 2002, 12: 1312-16.
37. Tant ML, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC, Brouwer WH. Hemianopic visual field defect elicit hemianopic scanning. Vision Res 2002; 42: 1339-48.
38. Zihl J. 'Blindsight': improvement of visually guided eye movements by systematic practice in patients with cerebral blindness. Neuropsychologia 1980; 18: 71-7.
39. Zihl, J. Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness. Effect of specific practice with saccadic localization. Exp Brain Res 1981; 44: 159-69.
40. Zihl J. Rehabilitation of visual impairments in patients with brain damage. In: Koijman AC, Looijesijn PL, Welling JA, van der Wildt GJ, editors. Low vision. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1994.
41. Zihl J. Visual scanning behaviour in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 287-303.
42. Zihl J. Rehabilitation of visual disorders after brain injury. UK: Psychological Press 2000.
43. Zihl J, von Cramon D. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. Brain 1985; 108: 335-65.
44. Zihl J, Kennard, C. Disorders of higher visual function. In: Brandt T, Caplan LR, Dichgans J, Diener HC, Kennard C, editors. Neurological disorders: course and treatment. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
45. Zihl J, Hebel N. Patterns of oculomotor scanning in patients with unilateral posterior parietal or frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 893-906.