Scanning the visual world: A study of patients with homonymous hemianopia

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 751-759

  Pambakian, A L M ^a   Wooding, D S ^b   Patel, N ^a   Morland, A B ^c   Kennard, C ^a   Mannan, S K ^a  

^a Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DERBY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Homonymous hemianopia; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FIXATION FAILURE; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LATENT PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; VISION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0033653190     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.6.751     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. High level scene perception. Ann Rev Psycho! 1999;50:243-71.
2. Buswell GT. How people look at pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.
3. Antes JR. The time course of picture viewing. J Exp Psychol 1974;103:62-70.
4. Mackworth NH, Morandi AJ. The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Percept Psychophys 1967;2:547-52.
5. Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spat Vis 1995; 9:363-86.
6. Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. Spat Vis 1997;10:165-88.
7. Locher PJ, Nodine CF. Symmetry catches the eye. Eye movements: from physiology to cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevir, 1987.
8. Richards W, Kaufman L. Centre of gravity tendencies for fixations and flow patterns. Percept Psychophys 1969;5:81-4.
9. Loftus GR, Mackworth NH. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1978;4:565-72.
10. De Graef P, Christiaens D, d'Ydewalle G. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychol Res 1990; 52:317-29.
11. Yarbus AL. Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum, 1967.
12. Land MF, Furneaux S. The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. Philos Trasn R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997;352:1231-9.
13. Land MF, Lee DN. Where we look when we steer. Nature 1994;364:742-4.
14. Land MF, Horwood J. Which parts of the road guide steering. Nature 1995;337:339-40.
15. Hodgson TL, Bajwa A, Owen AM, et al. The strategic control of gaze direction during the Tower of London task. J Cogn Neurosci 2000;12:894-907.
16. Groner R, Walder F, Groner M. Looking at faces: local and global aspects of scanpaths. Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984.
17. Locher PJ, Nodine CF. The role of scanpaths in the recognition of random shapes. Percept Psychophys 1974;15:308-14.
18. Walker-Smith GJ, Gale AG, Findlay JM. Eye movement strategies in face perception. Perception 1977;6:313-26.
19. Chédru F, Leblanc M, Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex 1973;9:94-111.
20. Zihl J. Visual scanning behaviour in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:287-303.
21. Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H. Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1987;25:675-9.
22. Gassel MM, Williams D. Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Part II. Oculomotor mechanisms. Brain 1963;86:1-36.
23. Meienberg O, Zangemeister WH, Rosenberg M, et al. Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Ann Neurol 1981;9:537-44.
24. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Hallinghan PW. Development of a behavioural test of visuaspatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:98-102.
25. Barbur JL, Thompson WD, Forsyth PM. A new system for the simultaneous measurements of pupil size and two-dimentional eye-movements. Clin Vis Sci 1987;2:131-42.
26. Jacobs AM. Le contrôle oculomoteur dans l'exploration visuelle: mécanismes sensorimoieurs et processus cognitifs [PhD Thesis]. Paris, France: Université René Descartes, 1986.
27. Zangemeister WH, Oechsner U, Freksa C. Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemi-field defects indicates high level control of human scanpath. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:467-7.
28. Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
29. Jahnke MT, Denzler P, Liebelt B, et al. Eye movements and fixation characteristics in perception of stationary scenes: normal subjects as compared to patients with usual neglect or hemianopia. Eur J Neurol 1995;2:275-95.
30. Finke RA, Pinker S. Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns. J Exp Psychol 1983;9:398-410.
31. Zangemeister WH, Stark L. Gaze movements: patterns linking latency and VOR gain. Neuro-ophthalmology 1989;9: 299-308.
32. Zangemeister WH, Sherman K, Stark L. Evidence for global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia 1995b;33:1009-25.
33. Zihl J. Neuropsychologische rehabilitation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
34. Kerkhoff G, Münßinger U, Haaf E, et al. Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomata in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1992;4:245-54.